Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 17 › Proposal

Bring federal charges where local prosecutors decline to

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 17, p. 553. Written by Gene Hamilton.

Bring federal charges where local prosecutors decline to

The document says “should”Who acts: DOJHow: internal managementp. 553 in the PDF
What the document says

“Use applicable federal laws to bring federal charges against criminals when local jurisdictions wrongfully allow them to evade responsibility for their conduct.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 553

The chapter says prosecution in most jurisdictions must remain a state and local responsibility, but that the federal government owes a special responsibility to Americans where state and local prosecutors have abdicated that duty. It asks for an increased federal law enforcement presence in such places.

What the document actually says

“Use applicable federal laws to bring federal charges against criminals when local jurisdictions wrongfully allow them to evade responsibility for their conduct.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 553
That sentence, in plain words

Some local prosecutors let people off. Federal law should be used to charge them instead.

What this is about

Most crimes are charged by local prosecutors. The book says some choose not to charge. It says federal prosecutors should step in.

What has happened
Partly matches

Additional Measures To Address the Crime Emergency in the District of Columbia

2025-08-25 · 90 FR 42121

Executive Order 14339 of August 25, 2025 puts more federal law enforcement into a jurisdiction the order says has lost control of crime: the Park Police are to hire in the District of Columbia and enforce the DC Code, the United States Attorney for the District is to hire prosecutors focused on violent and property crime, and a specialized federal unit is created that the order says could be deployed in other cities where public safety and order has been lost. That answers the chapter's call for a greater federal law enforcement presence where local authorities are said to have abdicated. The fit breaks down on the proposal's actual instruction: the order does not direct anyone to bring federal charges against criminals whom local prosecutors declined to charge. It rests on a declared crime emergency in the capital and the Home Rule Act rather than on a general charging policy, and deployment to any other city is contingent.

In plain English

An order of August 25, 2025 sends more police and prosecutors into the capital. It also sets up a unit that could go to other cities. That is the bigger federal role the chapter wants. But it tells no one to bring charges in cases the local side dropped.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 553.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Bring federal charges where local prosecutors decline to,” Project 2025, chapter 17, p. 553. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch17-federal-charges-in-lenient-jurisdictions/ (retrieved October 8, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →