Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 21 › Proposal

Commercialize National Weather Service forecasting

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 21, p. 675. Written by Thomas F. Gilman.

Commercialize National Weather Service forecasting

The document says “should”Who acts: NOAA, CommerceHow: internal managementp. 675 in the PDF
What the document says

“the NWS should fully commercialize its forecasting operations.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 675

The chapter states that Americans rely on forecasts produced not by the Weather Service but by private companies such as AccuWeather, that studies have found private forecasts more reliable, and that the Weather Service supplies the data those companies use and should focus on data gathering. It adds that the service should be a candidate to become a performance-based organization.

What the document actually says

“the NWS should fully commercialize its forecasting operations.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 675
That sentence, in plain words

The weather service should let private firms do the forecasts.

What this is about

The weather service makes forecasts and warnings. Private firms make them too, using its data. The book says the private firms should do the forecasting.

What has happened
Runs the other way

Making consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes

2026-01-23 · 140 Stat. 5

Section 114 of the Commerce title of this appropriations act, approved January 23, 2026, provides that the National Weather Service shall maintain staffing levels in order to fulfill the mission required under 15 U.S.C. 313 to protect life and property to the maximum extent possible. That is a statutory direction to keep the service staffed for its own mission, which runs the other way from a proposal to move its forecasting operations to private companies and leave it gathering data. The fit breaks down because the section speaks only to staffing and names no number and no baseline, because it says nothing about who produces forecasts and does not bar the service from relying on or contracting with private forecasters, because 15 U.S.C. 313 is a separate statute that is not indexed here so what that mission covers is not recorded, and because the same sentence appears in the Act for several other agencies, which makes it a general staffing provision rather than an answer aimed at this proposal.

In plain English

A part of the 2026 spending law tells the weather service to keep enough staff to do its job. That runs against a plan to hand forecasts to private firms. But the line speaks only to staff and sets no number. It says nothing about who makes forecasts, and the same line covers other agencies.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 675.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Commercialize National Weather Service forecasting,” Project 2025, chapter 21, p. 675. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch21-commercialize-weather-forecasts/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →