Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 22 › Proposal

Cap the untaxed employee benefits an employer can deduct

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 22, p. 697. Written by William L. Walton, Stephen Moore, David R. Burton.

Cap the untaxed employee benefits an employer can deduct

The document says “should”Who acts: Congress, TreasuryHow: legislationp. 697 in the PDF
What the document says

“the next Administration should set a meaningful cap (no higher than $12,000 per year per full-time equivalent employee—and preferably lower) on untaxed benefits”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 697

The chapter frames this as reducing the tax bias against wages relative to benefits. It says benefit expenses other than tax-deferred retirement contributions should count toward the limit, including shared benefits such as employee gym facilities, that the cap should not be indexed to inflation, and that employers should be denied deductions for health insurance and other benefits provided to dependents aged 23 or older.

What the document actually says

“the next Administration should set a meaningful cap (no higher than $12,000 per year per full-time equivalent employee—and preferably lower) on untaxed benefits”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 697
That sentence, in plain words

Set a limit on tax-free job perks. No more than $12,000 a year per worker.

What this is about

Some job perks are not taxed, like health cover. The book says that favors perks over pay. It wants a cap on how much can go untaxed.

Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. Nothing indexed caps the deduction an employer may take for untaxed employee benefits or sets any per employee limit. None of the candidates is on the subject: they are a return to in-person work memorandum, an H-2B visa cap rule, a drug pricing order, a student loan rule and a litigation record. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 697.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Cap the untaxed employee benefits an employer can deduct,” Project 2025, chapter 22, p. 697. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch22-cap-untaxed-benefits/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →