Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 22 › Proposal

Give the Taxpayer Advocate more resources and strengthen taxpayer rights

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 22, p. 700. Written by William L. Walton, Stephen Moore, David R. Burton.

Give the Taxpayer Advocate more resources and strengthen taxpayer rights

The document says “should”Who acts: CongressHow: legislationp. 700 in the PDF
What the document says

“Congress should provide the Office of the Taxpayer Advocate with greater resources”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 700

The chapter says legal protections for taxpayer rights and privacy remain inadequate, and asks that interest on overpayments match interest on underpayments rather than the government receiving a higher rate, that the time limit for suing over improper collection be extended, that the Tax Court's jurisdiction be expanded, and that the penalty structure be rationalized with the most punitive penalties reduced.

What the document actually says

“Congress should provide the Office of the Taxpayer Advocate with greater resources”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 700
That sentence, in plain words

Give the office that helps taxpayers more money to work with.

What this is about

One office helps people the tax agency has treated wrongly. The book says it needs more staff and money.

Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. Nothing indexed adds resources to the Office of the Taxpayer Advocate, matches the interest rate on overpayments to the rate on underpayments, extends the time to sue over improper collection, or expands the Tax Court's jurisdiction. The candidates are unrelated to the subject. The nearest enacted law on taxpayer rights is the Internal Revenue Service Math and Taxpayer Help Act, which requires a math error notice to describe the error in plain language, to show an itemized computation and to display the abatement deadline, but it says nothing about the Advocate or about any of the other changes asked for here. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 700.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Give the Taxpayer Advocate more resources and strengthen taxpayer rights,” Project 2025, chapter 22, p. 700. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch22-strengthen-taxpayer-advocate/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →