Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 26 › Proposal

Ban Chinese social media applications

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 26, p. 789. Written by Peter Navarro, Kent Lassman.

Ban Chinese social media applications

The document says “should”Who acts: President, CongressHow: legislationIn: The Case for Fair Trade · Peter Navarrop. 789 in the PDF
What the document says

“Ban all Chinese social media apps such as TikTok and WeChat, which pose significant national security risks”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 789

The essay says these applications expose American consumers to data and identity theft. It appears in the list of measures the essay asks the next President to adopt as a package.

What the document actually says

“Ban all Chinese social media apps such as TikTok and WeChat, which pose significant national security risks”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 789
That sentence, in plain words

Ban Chinese social apps like TikTok and WeChat. They are a security risk.

What this is about

Some popular apps are owned by Chinese firms. This essay says they put data at risk. It says they should be banned.

What is disputed
What this means is contested

This chapter contains the opposing case. 'The Case for Free Trade', by Kent Lassman, argues the reverse: that tariffs have backfired, that trade policy is the wrong tool for industrial goals, and that the next Administration should ignore what it calls populist ideologues seeking protection. Neither essay is presented as the chapter's conclusion.

What has happened
Runs the other way

Application of Protecting Americans From Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act to TikTok

2025-01-20 · 90 FR 8611

The proposal asks for a ban on Chinese social media applications including TikTok. Executive Order 14166 of January 20, 2025 goes the other way on the same application: it orders the Attorney General not to enforce the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act for 75 days, to impose no penalty for conduct during that period or before it, to write each provider a letter stating there was no violation, and to resist enforcement by states or private parties. What it does not do is repeal the statute: the ban remains law, the order is framed as time limited while the administration reviews intelligence and seeks a divestiture, and three later orders extended the delay. It also reaches only TikTok and other ByteDance applications, not WeChat or Chinese applications generally.

In plain English

The book asked for a ban on Chinese social apps. This order goes the other way on one of them. It tells the Attorney General not to enforce the ban law for 75 days. He must also write the owner that no law was broken. The ban itself is still law, and later orders stretched the delay. The order reaches only that app and its owner, not other Chinese apps.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 789.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Ban Chinese social media applications,” Project 2025, chapter 26, p. 789. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch26-ban-chinese-social-apps/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →