Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 27 › Proposal

Abolish diversity offices at financial regulators

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 27, p. 830. Written by David R. Burton, Robert Bowes.

Abolish diversity offices at financial regulators

The document says “should”Who acts: Congress, PresidentHow: legislationIn: Securities and Exchange Commission and Related Agencies · David R. Burtonp. 830 in the PDF
What the document says

“Offices at financial regulators that promote racist policies (usually in the name of “diversity, equity, and inclusion”) should be abolished”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 830

The part says discrimination based on immutable characteristics has no place in financial regulation, asks that regulations requiring appointments on the basis of race, ethnicity, sex or sexual orientation be eliminated, and says equal protection, equal opportunity and individual merit should govern regulatory decisions.

What the document actually says

“Offices at financial regulators that promote racist policies (usually in the name of “diversity, equity, and inclusion”) should be abolished”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 830
That sentence, in plain words

Close these offices at the finance watchdogs.

What this is about

Money watchdogs have offices that work on fairness in hiring. The book says those rules are unfair. It wants the offices shut.

What has happened
Partly matches

Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity

2025-01-21 · 90 FR 8633

Executive Order 14173 of January 21, 2025 orders all executive departments and agencies to terminate all discriminatory and illegal preferences, mandates, policies, programs, activities, guidance, regulations, enforcement actions, consent orders and requirements, and revokes Executive Order 11246 along with three other diversity directives. To the extent financial regulators are covered by that instruction, it reaches the regulations the proposal wants eliminated. The fit breaks down on the specific ask: the order abolishes no office, names no financial regulator, and creates no exception process for the offices of minority and women inclusion that Dodd-Frank requires by statute at the banking and securities agencies, which an executive order cannot close. Its detailed operative provisions run to federal contractors, private employers and educational institutions rather than to the regulators themselves.

In plain English

The order tells every agency to end programs and deals it calls illegal. It also pulls four older orders. Where the agencies that watch banks and markets fall under it, the rules the book targets are reached. But the order shuts no office and names no such agency. Some of these offices are set by law, and an order cannot close them. Most of the text aims at contractors and schools.

What cites those orders

20 agency rules

8 more not listed here.

Each of these names the order above in its own summary, preamble or filing. That is a fact about the document, not a finding that it carries out this proposal: it is one step further away than the order is, and what it does about the proposal is a reading nobody has made here.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 830.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Abolish diversity offices at financial regulators,” Project 2025, chapter 27, p. 830. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch27-abolish-financial-dei-offices/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →