Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 30 › Proposal

Expand the consumer welfare standard beyond price

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 30, p. 872. Written by Adam Candeub.

Expand the consumer welfare standard beyond price

The document says “must”Who acts: FTCHow: regulationp. 872 in the PDF
What the document says

“the consumer welfare standard must guide FTC action, but, in appropriate situations and with strong evidence, this standard must be expanded to include more factors than just price.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 872

The consumer welfare standard asks whether conduct harms consumers, in practice mostly through higher prices. The chapter asks that the same standard of proof used to show harm to competition also apply to the efficiencies offered to justify a practice, and separately says the agency must consider the role of government itself in maintaining market concentration, since compliance costs favor large firms.

What the document actually says

“the consumer welfare standard must guide FTC action, but, in appropriate situations and with strong evidence, this standard must be expanded to include more factors than just price.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 872
That sentence, in plain words

Keep judging by harm to shoppers. But weigh more than price alone.

What this is about

Antitrust asks whether shoppers are harmed. In practice that means higher prices. The book says other harms should count too.

What is disputed
What this means is contested

The chapter records that conservatives disagree about the agency's role at the most basic level. It asks directly whether the Commission should enforce antitrust or even continue to exist, and notes that some conservatives think antitrust enforcement should sit solely with the Department of Justice.

Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. Nothing indexed states or revises the standard the FTC applies. EO 14366 of December 11, 2025 comes nearest in substance: it directs the FTC to investigate practices that harm consumers by undermining their ability to make informed choices and by diminishing the value of their investments, which are theories of harm that do not run through price. But the order names no standard, says nothing about the evidence required to prove harm or to credit a claimed efficiency, and does not touch the chapter's separate point about compliance costs and the government's own role in market concentration. EO 14254 of March 31, 2025 directs the FTC toward ticket price transparency and price gouging, which is the price-centered application the chapter wants expanded beyond, not an expansion of it. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 872.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Expand the consumer welfare standard beyond price,” Project 2025, chapter 30, p. 872. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch30-expand-consumer-welfare-standard/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →