Every recorded vote of the 119th Congress in which the Clerk of the House lists this member, taken from their own per-vote records. Nothing is sampled and nothing is left out.
The House votes Yea and Nay on the floor and Aye and No in the Committee of the Whole. They are different words for the same two answers, and the site keeps the word the Clerk recorded as well as which side it fell on.
The statements are not complete and are not meant to be. A measure with no statement against it means only that none has been indexed here.
What was said, and what was done
2026-07-22
HONORING THE LIFE OF LOUIS "L.B." ECKELKAMP, JR.
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor the life and legacy of one of my constituents and a dear friend, Louis ``L.B.'' Eckelkamp, Jr. of Washington, Missouri. It is difficult to put into words what L.B. meant for so many people and the City of Washington.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of July 22, 2026.
In plain English
A tribute to Louis L.B. Eckelkamp, Jr. of Washington, Missouri. The speaker says he was a constituent and a dear friend. They say it is hard to put into words what he meant to many people. They say the same about what he meant to the City of Washington.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2026-07-06
HONORING THE 200TH ANNIVERSARY OF JEFFERSON BARRACKS
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of my resolution celebrating the 200th anniversary of Jefferson Barracks in St. Louis County, Missouri. Established on July 10, 1826, Jefferson Barracks is the oldest operational military installation west of the Mississippi River and has played a remarkable role in our nation's defense.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of July 6, 2026.
In plain English
They spoke in support of a resolution about Jefferson Barracks. It sits in St. Louis County, Missouri. They say it was set up on July 10, 1826. They say it is the oldest working military post west of the Mississippi River. They say it has played a remarkable role in the nation's defense.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2026-06-25
PERSONAL EXPLANATION
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. Speaker I regret that I was not present for Roll Call Votes on June 24, 2026. Had I been present, I would have voted YEA on Roll Call No. 225, and YEA on Roll Call No. 226.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of June 25, 2026.
In plain English
They say they were not present for roll call votes on June 24, 2026. They say they regret missing those votes. They say that had they been there, they would have voted yes on Roll Call No. 225. They say they also would have voted yes on Roll Call No. 226.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2025-12-12
INCREASING INVESTOR OPPORTUNITIES ACT
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. Chair, I would like to share the preliminary estimate by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) on H.R. 3383, the INVEST Act. CBO has previously estimated the direct spending and revenue effects, on a preliminary or final basis, for each section of the Rules version of H.R. 3383.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of December 12, 2025.
In plain English
They say the Congressional Budget Office has a first look at H.R. 3383, the INVEST Act. They wish to share that early estimate. They say the office already studied each section of the Rules version of the bill. That study covered how the bill affects spending and revenue.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2025-12-10
INCREASING INVESTOR OPPORTUNITIES ACT
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. Chairman, I rise in respectful opposition to this amendment which would remove an important provision from the INVEST Act. Section 307 is not new or untested policy.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of December 10, 2025.
In plain English
They speak against this amendment. They say it would take out an important part of the INVEST Act. They say Section 307 is not a new or untested policy.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2025-12-10
INCREASING INVESTOR OPPORTUNITIES ACT
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. Chair, I thank the gentleman for yielding. I rise in support of the gentleman from Texas' amendment. This is a commonsense clarification that ensures section 105 cannot be misinterpreted as a blank check for expanding the Federal bureaucracy.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of December 10, 2025.
In plain English
They thank the member who gave them time to speak. They speak in support of an amendment from the member from Texas. They say it is a commonsense clarification. They say it makes sure section 105 is not read as a blank check. They say that blank check would grow the Federal bureaucracy.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2025-12-10
INCREASING INVESTOR OPPORTUNITIES ACT
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to this amendment, which would impose sweeping new regulatory requirements on investment advisers and hedge funds serving foreign clients. While combating illicit finance and addressing national security threats are critical objectives we all share, this amendment takes the wrong approach, one that FinCEN itself recognized as flawed.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of December 10, 2025.
In plain English
They speak against this amendment. They say it would put broad new rules on investment advisers and hedge funds with foreign clients. They say fighting illegal money and national security threats are shared goals. But they say this amendment is the wrong way, and that FinCEN saw it as flawed.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2025-12-10
INCREASING INVESTOR OPPORTUNITIES ACT
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. Chairman, I rise one more time in closing to oppose this amendment by Ms. Garcia that requires investment advisers and hedge funds to perform know-your-customer verifications and implement anti-money laundering procedures for foreign clients.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of December 10, 2025.
In plain English
They say they rise once more, at the close, to oppose an amendment. They say the amendment comes from Ms. Garcia. They say it would require investment advisers and hedge funds to verify who their customers are. They say it would also make them set up anti money laundering steps for clients from other countries.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2025-12-10
INCREASING INVESTOR OPPORTUNITIES ACT
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. Chairman, I rise in strong opposition to this amendment, which would pose a significant obstacle for the same small businesses and startups that we aim to support.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of December 10, 2025.
In plain English
They speak against the amendment being debated. They say it would create a big obstacle. They say it would hurt the small businesses and startups the bill aims to help.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2025-12-10
INCREASING INVESTOR OPPORTUNITIES ACT
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. Chairman, I simply urge my colleagues to reject these unnecessary and harmful reporting burdens, and I ask that they oppose this amendment. I yield back the balance of my time.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of December 10, 2025.
In plain English
They ask other members to vote against the amendment. They say the reporting rules in it are not needed. They also say the rules would cause harm. They then give back the rest of their speaking time.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2025-12-10
INCREASING INVESTOR OPPORTUNITIES ACT
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. Chairman, I rise in strong opposition to this amendment, which represents a fundamental departure from the careful, deliberative process that has guided the INVEST Act. Let me be clear about what we are being asked to consider.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of December 10, 2025.
In plain English
They speak against the amendment being considered. They say it breaks from the careful, step by step process behind the INVEST Act. They say they want to be clear about what members are being asked to consider.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2025-12-01
DEVELOPING AND EMPOWERING OUR ASPIRING LEADERS ACT OF 2025
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. Speaker, I thank my friend from Ohio for yielding. Mr. Speaker, I am proud to sponsor H.R. 4429, the Developing and Empowering our Aspiring Leaders, or DEAL, Act.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of December 1, 2025.
This passage has not been rendered into plain English yet. What is above is the member's own words, exactly as the Record prints them.
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
Where the words are
The Congressional Record marks Ann Wagner as speaking in
32 items of business across 22 sitting days of this
Congress. 12 statements indexed here so far.
That count is where to look, not how much was said. Most appearances are procedural: a
yield of time, a request to revise and extend, a call for the yeas and nays.
It is also a floor and not a total. The count comes from the Record's own metadata, which
tags who spoke in each item of business, and that tagging is not complete: checking the text
turns up passages by members the metadata does not tag at all. A member may have said more
than this says.
The eight most recent, each linking to that day's Record at govinfo.
Every recorded vote
All 645 recorded votes of the 119th Congress in
which the Clerk of the House lists
Ann Wagner, newest first. The most recent 25 are below and the rest load on
request. Each roll number links to the official record of that vote.
Establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2027 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2028 through 2036
620 more, loaded from the published roll call list
What this covers
Up to 12 of this member's most recent floor remarks, taken verbatim from the Congressional Record with the page each is printed on. Procedural turns are left out: yielding time, reserving time, moving to suspend the rules.
Not covered.
Everything else this member said. The page says how many items of business they are marked as speaking in.
Any reading of the remarks. Where a vote is shown beside them it is because both are on the same measure that day, which is a fact about the two records and not a judgment.
A vote shown against remarks means the member spoke on that measure and voted on it the same day. It is not a claim that the words and the vote agree or disagree.
