Every recorded vote of the 119th Congress in which the Senate lists this member, taken from their own per-vote records. Nothing is sampled and nothing is left out.
The Senate records Yea and Nay, and Guilty or Not Guilty on an impeachment. The site keeps the word recorded as well as which side it fell on.
The statements are not complete and are not meant to be. A measure with no statement against it means only that none has been indexed here.
What was said, and what was done
2026-08-07
VOTE ON MOTION TO ADJOURN
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Madam President, if the motion for the Senate to adjourn with pro forma sessions scheduled until September 14 would have been a recorded rollcall vote, I would have voted no.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of August 7, 2026.
In plain English
They say the Senate had a motion to adjourn until September 14. They say that during that time, only pro forma sessions were planned. They say the motion was not decided by a recorded rollcall vote. They say that if it had been, they would have voted no.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2026-07-29
Unanimous Consent Requests (Executive Session)
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“I am objecting. Sorry. Well, let me--just continuing. So let's talk about voter ID really quickly. My colleague from California said that the Republicans are not united on voter ID, and that is absolutely, absolutely, positively false.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of July 29, 2026.
In plain English
They say they are objecting. They say they want to talk about voter ID. They say a colleague from California claimed Republicans are not united on voter ID. They say that claim is completely false.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2026-07-29
Unanimous Consent Requests (Executive Session)
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. President, reserving my right to object, the bill that my colleague from Nebraska, my colleague from Ohio, and my colleague from Utah is proposing is a bill that has already passed the House of Representatives.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of July 29, 2026.
In plain English
They reserve the right to object. The bill comes from three other senators. Those senators are from Nebraska, Ohio, and Utah. They say the House has already passed this bill.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2026-07-27
Unanimous Consent Requests (Executive Session)
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. President, reserving the right to object. There is an expression that says don't let facts get in the way of a good story. What we just heard is a good story.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of July 27, 2026.
In plain English
They speak while reserving the right to object. They mention a saying about not letting facts get in the way of a good story. They say what was just heard is a good story.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
“Mr. President, very briefly, let me make a couple of things clear. This resolution isn't about insulting Canadians; this resolution is about calling out inept leaders in Canada.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of July 22, 2026.
In plain English
They say the resolution is not meant to insult people in Canada. They say it is meant to criticize leaders in Canada they call inept. They spoke briefly to make that point clear.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
“Madam President, reserving the right to object, let me say a few things. One, resolutions like this sound very much mild. It actually is just a bunch of words that basically just say: Resolved, That the Senate recognizes unchecked climate change poses severe risks to national and global economies.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of July 21, 2026.
In plain English
They say they are reserving the right to object. They say resolutions like this one sound very mild. They say it is just a bunch of words. They say it states that the Senate recognizes a risk. They say the risk is that unchecked climate change harms national and global economies.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2026-07-20
ORDER FOR ADJOURNMENT
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“You know, in debate, they taught me, if there is nobody who objects to your point, that that point is made. So I think the Democrats have ceded that point.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of July 20, 2026.
In plain English
They say debate taught them a lesson about unopposed points. They say a point stands when no one objects to it. They say the Democrats have therefore given up that point.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2026-07-20
ORDER FOR ADJOURNMENT
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“The response? Hearing none. All right. We are going to move on to objection No. 2; that is, it is already illegal. It is interesting because that is a good point.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of July 20, 2026.
In plain English
They note there was no response, and say hearing none. They then move on to the second objection. That objection is that the thing is already illegal. They call that a good point.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2026-07-20
ORDER FOR ADJOURNMENT
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Do you think it is possible that in a country like Colombia that has incredible amounts of ethnic diversity and Hispanics--like myself, I was born there--that when you are Hispanic and you are in Colombia, you are able to find your ID, but that when you cross the border, you lose that ability?”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of July 20, 2026.
In plain English
They speak about Colombia. They say it has great ethnic diversity and Hispanic people. They say they were born there. They ask if a Hispanic person can find their ID in Colombia. They ask if that ability is lost after crossing the border.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2026-07-20
ORDER FOR ADJOURNMENT
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Well, obviously, we are being sarcastic, and the reason we are being sarcastic is this is really ridiculous. It actually is just blatantly ridiculous that we are sitting here on the floor of the U.S.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of July 20, 2026.
In plain English
The speaker admits to being sarcastic. They say the reason is that the situation is ridiculous. They call it blatantly ridiculous. They point to what is happening on the floor of the U.S.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2026-06-17
IRAN
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. President, just really quickly and with all due respect to my colleague from Connecticut, he wasn't part of the negotiation process. He has no idea what conversations were had with the Iranians.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of June 17, 2026.
In plain English
They respond to a colleague from Connecticut. They say that colleague was not part of the negotiations. They say he does not know what was discussed with the Iranians. They say this with respect for him.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
Where the words are
The Congressional Record marks Bernie Moreno as speaking in
143 items of business across 51 sitting days of this
Congress. 12 statements indexed here so far.
That count is where to look, not how much was said. Most appearances are procedural: a
yield of time, a request to revise and extend, a call for the yeas and nays.
It is also a floor and not a total. The count comes from the Record's own metadata, which
tags who spoke in each item of business, and that tagging is not complete: checking the text
turns up passages by members the metadata does not tag at all. A member may have said more
than this says.
The eight most recent, each linking to that day's Record at govinfo.
Every recorded vote
All 890 recorded votes of the 119th Congress in
which the Senate lists
Bernie Moreno, newest first. The most recent 25 are below and the rest load on
request. Each roll number links to the official record of that vote.
Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 180 from the Committee on Foreign Relations
On the Motion to Discharge
Nay
Motion to Discharge Rejected
865 more, loaded from the published roll call list
What this covers
Up to 12 of this member's most recent floor remarks, taken verbatim from the Congressional Record with the page each is printed on. Procedural turns are left out: yielding time, reserving time, moving to suspend the rules.
Not covered.
Everything else this member said. The page says how many items of business they are marked as speaking in.
Any reading of the remarks. Where a vote is shown beside them it is because both are on the same measure that day, which is a fact about the two records and not a judgment.
A vote shown against remarks means the member spoke on that measure and voted on it the same day. It is not a claim that the words and the vote agree or disagree.
