Every recorded vote of the 119th Congress in which the Clerk of the House lists this member, taken from their own per-vote records. Nothing is sampled and nothing is left out.
The House votes Yea and Nay on the floor and Aye and No in the Committee of the Whole. They are different words for the same two answers, and the site keeps the word the Clerk recorded as well as which side it fell on.
The statements are not complete and are not meant to be. A measure with no statement against it means only that none has been indexed here.
What was said, and what was done
2026-02-04
PERSONAL EXPLANATION
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. Speaker, I was in negotiations with the Whip and other leadership regarding the path forward on the SAVE Act and my misgivings with the bill and the vote closed before I cast my vote.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of February 4, 2026.
In plain English
They say they were in talks with the Whip and other leaders. The talks were about how to move forward on the SAVE Act. They say they had concerns about the bill. They say the vote closed before they could cast their vote.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2025-12-18
PET AND LIVESTOCK PROTECTION ACT
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. Speaker, I am very proud to have sponsored this legislation and have fought this battle for many years. I think we could actually get it done this time.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of December 18, 2025.
In plain English
They say they are proud to have sponsored this bill. They say they have fought this battle for many years. They say they think it could actually get done this time.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2025-12-18
PET AND LIVESTOCK PROTECTION ACT
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. Speaker, I don't need much time. The question was asked if we had ever bothered speaking to trans kids. The answer is absolutely yes. Maybe that is why I am so passionate about this.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of December 18, 2025.
In plain English
They say they do not need much time to respond. They note someone asked whether they had ever spoken with trans kids. They say the answer is absolutely yes. They say that may be why they feel so passionate about this.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2025-12-18
PET AND LIVESTOCK PROTECTION ACT
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. Speaker, I will not be long. I will just ask a simple question, because the statement was made that all the science suggests that these procedures are medically necessary.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of December 18, 2025.
In plain English
They say they will not speak for long. They say they only want to ask a simple question. They note that someone had said all the science suggests these procedures are medically necessary.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2025-12-18
PET AND LIVESTOCK PROTECTION ACT
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. Speaker, you would say that is insane. You would call that absolutely insane, and it would be insane. Here is the reality. The scary part about that analogy is that it is actually a lot less troubling to lose an eye than it is to completely change your gender.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of December 18, 2025.
In plain English
They say most people would call that idea insane. They say it truly would be insane. They say the analogy is scary. They say losing an eye is less troubling than fully changing a person's gender.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2025-12-18
PET AND LIVESTOCK PROTECTION ACT
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. Speaker, in closing, let's just summarize what we have heard today. We have heard that so-called gender-affirming care is necessary, effective, prevents suicides, and helps vulnerable children.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of December 18, 2025.
In plain English
They close by summing up the day's debate. They say the House heard that so-called gender-affirming care is needed. They say it was called effective. They say it was described as stopping suicides and helping children at risk.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2025-07-15
REMEMBERING THE VICTIMS OF CAMP MYSTIC
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. Speaker, what happened in Kerr County was not a typical flood. We know floods in Houston. We know worst-case scenarios, and this is one of them. More than 6 inches of rain fell in just a few hours.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of July 15, 2025.
In plain English
They say what happened in Kerr County was not a typical flood. They say people in Houston know floods and know worst-case scenarios. They say this was one of those worst cases. They say more than 6 inches of rain fell in just a few hours.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2025-05-08
GULF OF AMERICA ACT
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. Speaker, I was detained for 3 minutes by personal phone call and they closed the vote very quickly. Had I been present, I would have voted AYE on Roll Call No. 122.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of May 8, 2025.
In plain English
A member explains that they missed a vote. They say a personal phone call kept them away for three minutes. They say the vote was closed very quickly. They state that they would have voted yes on Roll Call No. 122 if present.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2025-03-05
PROVIDING FOR CONGRESSIONAL DISAPPROVAL OF THE RULE SUBMITTED BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY RELATING
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.J. Res. 61 because it is common sense. The Biden administration decided to put these additional regulations on tire manufacturers. The inevitable consequence of that, of course, is increasing the cost of tires for the American people.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of March 5, 2025.
In plain English
They speak in support of H.J. Res. 61, calling it common sense. They say the Biden administration added new rules for tire makers. They say the certain result is higher tire costs for Americans.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Spoke and voted on this measure
H J RES 61: On Passage · Dan Crenshaw voted for (Yea)
Roll Call 58, 119th Congress, 1st Session
The remarks and the vote are both on H.J. Res. 61 on this day. Dan Crenshaw voted Yea on on passage. The site records that they concern the same measure and has not read one against the other.
2025-02-06
HALT ALL LETHAL TRAFFICKING OF FENTANYL ACT
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of the HALT Fentanyl Act because it is the most obvious thing in the world to be in support of.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of February 6, 2025.
In plain English
They speak in support of the HALT Fentanyl Act. They say backing this bill is the most obvious thing in the world.
rendered by machine, checked against the same reading level as the rest
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
Where the words are
The Congressional Record marks Dan Crenshaw as speaking in
6 items of business across 6 sitting days of this
Congress. 10 statements indexed here so far.
That count is where to look, not how much was said. Most appearances are procedural: a
yield of time, a request to revise and extend, a call for the yeas and nays.
It is also a floor and not a total. The count comes from the Record's own metadata, which
tags who spoke in each item of business, and that tagging is not complete: checking the text
turns up passages by members the metadata does not tag at all. A member may have said more
than this says.
The eight most recent, each linking to that day's Record at govinfo.
Every recorded vote
All 645 recorded votes of the 119th Congress in
which the Clerk of the House lists
Dan Crenshaw, newest first. The most recent 25 are below and the rest load on
request. Each roll number links to the official record of that vote.
Establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2027 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2028 through 2036
620 more, loaded from the published roll call list
What this covers
Up to 12 of this member's most recent floor remarks, taken verbatim from the Congressional Record with the page each is printed on. Procedural turns are left out: yielding time, reserving time, moving to suspend the rules.
Not covered.
Everything else this member said. The page says how many items of business they are marked as speaking in.
Any reading of the remarks. Where a vote is shown beside them it is because both are on the same measure that day, which is a fact about the two records and not a judgment.
A vote shown against remarks means the member spoke on that measure and voted on it the same day. It is not a claim that the words and the vote agree or disagree.
