Every recorded vote of the 119th Congress in which the Senate lists this member, taken from their own per-vote records. Nothing is sampled and nothing is left out.
The Senate records Yea and Nay, and Guilty or Not Guilty on an impeachment. The site keeps the word recorded as well as which side it fell on.
The statements are not complete and are not meant to be. A measure with no statement against it means only that none has been indexed here.
What was said, and what was done
2026-07-16
LEGISLATIVE SESSION
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. President, in reserving the right to object, this bill will needlessly punish the Northern Mariana Islands and significantly--or I should say further--harm its tourist economy, which is the islands' largest source of revenue and jobs.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of July 16, 2026.
This passage has not been rendered into plain English yet. What is above is the member's own words, exactly as the Record prints them.
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2026-04-16
LEGISLATIVE SESSION
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. President, why are we here today? We are here today because some people want to abuse the Congressional Review Act and use it in a way it has never been used before.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of April 16, 2026.
This passage has not been rendered into plain English yet. What is above is the member's own words, exactly as the Record prints them.
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2026-04-15
H.J. RES. 140
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. President, I want to thank my colleague from Minnesota for her endless advocacy for this special place, one of America's true gems. I do hope to make it to the Boundary Waters this summer.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of April 15, 2026.
This passage has not been rendered into plain English yet. What is above is the member's own words, exactly as the Record prints them.
Set against the record
Spoke and voted on this measure
H.J.Res. 140: On the Motion to Table · Martin Heinrich voted against (Nay)
Senate Roll Call 82, 119th Congress, 2nd Session
The remarks and the vote are both on H.J. RES. 140 on this day. Martin Heinrich voted Nay on on the motion to table. The site records that they concern the same measure and has not read one against the other.
“Mr. President, reserving the right to object, the sexual assault, the abuse that Ana Murguia, Debra Rojas, and Dolores Huerta have described is horrific, and it necessarily and profoundly changes Cesar Chavez's legacy and how he should be remembered.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of April 14, 2026.
This passage has not been rendered into plain English yet. What is above is the member's own words, exactly as the Record prints them.
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
“Mr. President, reserving the right to object, I think what we agree on is that Cesar Chavez should not be lionized and his name should not be associated with a monument in the United States of America and a unit of the National Park Service.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of April 14, 2026.
This passage has not been rendered into plain English yet. What is above is the member's own words, exactly as the Record prints them.
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2026-03-18
SAFEGUARD AMERICAN VOTER ELIGIBILITY ACT--Continued
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. President, nearly 5 years ago, I stood on the Senate floor, and I said that we were ``facing the most dangerous and overt threat to our democratic system in generations.'' I was speaking then in support of the John Lewis For the People Act.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of March 18, 2026.
This passage has not been rendered into plain English yet. What is above is the member's own words, exactly as the Record prints them.
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2026-03-11
LEGISLATIVE SESSION
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. President, let me start off by pointing out that New Mexico is home to one of the most important living cultural landscapes in the United States. You may have heard of it.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of March 11, 2026.
This passage has not been rendered into plain English yet. What is above is the member's own words, exactly as the Record prints them.
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2026-01-07
PERMITTING REFORM
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. President, I am here today to join my colleague Senator Whitehouse in talking about permitting reform. I want to start with a story from my home State of New Mexico.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of January 7, 2026.
This passage has not been rendered into plain English yet. What is above is the member's own words, exactly as the Record prints them.
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2025-12-17
UNANIMOUS CONSENT REQUESTS--THE CALENDAR
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. President, reserving the right to object, as I have said a number of times now, I am not willing to send Democratic bills to the House without an agreement to get them through the House and to the President's desk.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of December 17, 2025.
This passage has not been rendered into plain English yet. What is above is the member's own words, exactly as the Record prints them.
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2025-12-03
S.J. Res. 91 (Executive Session)
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Mr. President, nestled in the far northeast corner of Alaska is one of the wildest and most untouched places left in North America: The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of December 3, 2025.
This passage has not been rendered into plain English yet. What is above is the member's own words, exactly as the Record prints them.
Set against the record
Spoke and voted on this measure
S.J.Res. 91: On the Motion to Proceed · Martin Heinrich voted against (Nay)
Senate Roll Call 630, 119th Congress, 1st Session
The remarks and the vote are both on S.J. Res. 91 on this day. Martin Heinrich voted Nay on on the motion to proceed. The site records that they concern the same measure and has not read one against the other.
2025-12-02
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2026--Motion to Proceed
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“Reserving the right to object, what we have in front of us are four bills, two Democrat and two Republican. My concern remains the same as it was, literally, 11 months ago; that passing bills one by one does not guarantee their final passage or being signed into law or that important local priorities from Democratic States will be honored along with those from Republican States.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of December 2, 2025.
This passage has not been rendered into plain English yet. What is above is the member's own words, exactly as the Record prints them.
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
2025-11-20
UNANIMOUS CONSENT REQUESTS
Remarkswhat was said on the floor, quoted and cited, with no reading of it written here
“The remedy to a statutory change that is in statute is not a resolution. It is to fix the statute. I think we should work with our colleagues in the House to address the underlying issue of protecting Members without the outrageous damage provisions that were retroactively put into this statute.”
Remarks in the Congressional Record of November 20, 2025.
This passage has not been rendered into plain English yet. What is above is the member's own words, exactly as the Record prints them.
Set against the record
Nothing on this site is matched to this statement. What it refers to is named in the summary.
Where the words are
The Congressional Record marks Martin Heinrich as speaking in
207 items of business across 40 sitting days of this
Congress. 12 statements indexed here so far.
That count is where to look, not how much was said. Most appearances are procedural: a
yield of time, a request to revise and extend, a call for the yeas and nays.
It is also a floor and not a total. The count comes from the Record's own metadata, which
tags who spoke in each item of business, and that tagging is not complete: checking the text
turns up passages by members the metadata does not tag at all. A member may have said more
than this says.
The eight most recent, each linking to that day's Record at govinfo.
Every recorded vote
All 890 recorded votes of the 119th Congress in
which the Senate lists
Martin Heinrich, newest first. The most recent 25 are below and the rest load on
request. Each roll number links to the official record of that vote.
Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 180 from the Committee on Foreign Relations
On the Motion to Discharge
Yea
Motion to Discharge Rejected
865 more, loaded from the published roll call list
What this covers
Up to 12 of this member's most recent floor remarks, taken verbatim from the Congressional Record with the page each is printed on. Procedural turns are left out: yielding time, reserving time, moving to suspend the rules.
Not covered.
Everything else this member said. The page says how many items of business they are marked as speaking in.
Any reading of the remarks. Where a vote is shown beside them it is because both are on the same measure that day, which is a fact about the two records and not a judgment.
A vote shown against remarks means the member spoke on that measure and voted on it the same day. It is not a claim that the words and the vote agree or disagree.
