Documents › Agency rules › 2025-11606 › Text 7 of 7
Health and Human Services Department
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Marketplace Integrity and Affordability
The text of the rule, page 7 of 7. 4 headings, 5,204 words, quoted as the Federal Register prints them.
← 10. Premium Payment Threshold (Sec. 155.400(g)) to E. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)Contents
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) also requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits before issuing any rule whose mandates require spending in any 1 year of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for inflation. In 2025, that threshold is approximately $187 million. Although we have not been able to quantify all costs, we expect that the combined impact on State, local, or Tribal governments and the private sector does not meet the UMRA definition of an unfunded mandate.
This final rule will not impose a mandate that will result in the expenditure by State, local, and Tribal Governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of more than $187 million in any 1 year.
G. Tribal Government and Consultation
Executive Orders 12866 and 13175 directs that significant regulatory actions avoid undue interference with Tribal governments \317\ and that Agencies respect Indian Tribal self-government and sovereignty, honor Tribal treaty and other rights, and strive to meet the responsibilities that arise from the unique legal relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribal governments Indian Tribal governments.\318\ The Department does not believe that the final rule would implicate the requirements of Executive Orders 12866 and 13175 with respect to Tribal sovereignty. Executive Order 13175 directs agencies to consult with Tribal officials prior to the formal promulgation of regulations having Tribal implications. Because many Tribal members rely on Exchange coverage and benefits provided by other HHS programs, HHS conducts monthly outreach to Tribal officials through the CMS Tribal Technical Advisory Group to discuss Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, and Exchange policies and issues, and specifically engaged the group in a discussion of the proposed rule. In doing so, HHS has met the requirements of Executive Order 13175.
\317\ Executive Order 12866 at Sec. 6(a)(3)(B).
\318\ Executive Order 13175 at Sec. 2(a).
H. Federalism
Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an agency must meet when it issues a proposed rule (and subsequent final rule) that imposes substantial direct requirement costs on State and local governments, preempts State law, or otherwise has Federalism implications.
In compliance with the requirement of Executive Order 13132 that agencies examine closely any policies that may have Federalism implications or limit the policy making discretion of the States, we have engaged in efforts to consult with and work cooperatively with affected States, including participating in conference calls with and attending conferences of the NAIC, and consulting with State insurance officials on an individual basis.
While developing this final rule, we attempted to balance the States' interests in regulating health insurance issuers with the need to ensure market stability. By doing so, we complied with the requirements of Executive Order 13132.
Because States have flexibility in designing their Exchange and Exchange-related programs, State decisions will ultimately influence both administrative expenses and overall premiums. States are not required to establish an Exchange. For States that elected previously to operate an Exchange, those States had the opportunity to use funds under Exchange Planning and Establishment Grants to fund the development of data. Accordingly, some of the initial cost of creating programs was funded by Exchange Planning and Establishment Grants. After establishment, Exchanges must be financially self-sustaining, with revenue sources at the discretion of the State. Current State Exchanges charge user fees to issuers.
In our view, this regulation has Federalism implications due to potential direct effects on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the State and Federal Governments relating to determining standards relating to health insurance that is offered in the individual and small group markets. For example, State Exchanges and States operating a BHP will be required to update their eligibility systems in order to no longer consider DACA recipients “lawfully present” for purposes of such programs. However, these Federalism implications may be balanced by the fact that we do not anticipate that these policies will impose substantial direct costs on the affected States, which in any event have chosen to operate their own Exchanges and eligibility and enrollment platforms, or the optional BHP. Additionally, the final rule will start the OEP for Exchanges on November 1 and end it on December 15 of the year preceding the benefit year, including for State Exchanges. For the 2025 annual OEP, 19 of 20 State Exchanges ended their OEP on or after January 15 of benefit year and one began before November 1 of the benefit year. This has Federalism implications because it will curtail flexibility in place to continue doing so. However, these implications may be balanced by limiting overall costs and burdens to State Exchanges on the basis of a truncated timeframe to hold open enrollment while maintaining flexibility to administer certain SEPs to support qualifying consumers. We intend that this final rule will preempt State law only to the extent such State law would prevent the application of these rules.\319\
\319\ See section 1321(d) of the ACA.
This final rule also has Federalism implications as related to the provision finalizing a prohibition on coverage of specified sex-trait modification procedures as EHB. We understand that some States believe sex-trait modification services must be covered pursuant to State nondiscrimination laws, one State requires coverage of sex-trait modification services as EHB by virtue of explicitly adding it to its EHB-benchmark plan through the process described at Sec. 156.111(a)(1), and some States consider sex-trait modification services to be covered as EHB because it is included in their State EHB- benchmark plan, even though they did not update their EHB-benchmark plan. If these States want to require coverage
of specified sex-trait modification procedures, as finalized in this rule, they will need to mandate that coverage outside of the EHB- benchmark update process at Sec. 156.111(a)(2) and defray the cost. However, as noted earlier in this final rule, we believe that such costs would be very small, as reflected by both low utilization and comments made in response to the proposed rule that costs are at most minuscule and may in fact be cost-neutral. Further, we note that Colorado, when it updated its EHB-benchmark plan to include sex-trait modification procedures, estimated that adding such benefits would have a 0.04 percent cost impact.
This final regulation is subject to the Congressional Review Act provisions of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) and has been transmitted to the Congress and the Comptroller General for review.
Mehmet Oz, Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, approved this document on June 10, 2025.
List of Subjects
45 CFR Part 147
Aged, Citizenship and naturalization, Civil rights, Health care, Health insurance, Individuals with disabilities, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and record keeping requirements, Sex discrimination.
45 CFR Part 155
Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising, Aged, Brokers, Citizenship and naturalization, Civil rights, Conflict of interests, Consumer protection, Grant programs--health, Grants administration, Health care, Health insurance, Health maintenance organizations (HMO), Health records, Hospitals, Indians, Individuals with disabilities, Intergovernmental relations, Loan programs--health, Medicaid, Organization and functions (Government agencies), Public assistance programs, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sex discrimination, State and local governments, Taxes, Technical assistance, Women, Youth.
45 CFR Part 156
Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising, Advisory committees, Brokers, Conflict of interests, Consumer protection, Grant programs--health, Grants administration, Health care, Health insurance, Health maintenance organization (HMO), Health records, Hospitals, Indians, Individuals with disabilities, Loan programs--health, Medicaid, Organization and functions (Government agencies), Public assistance programs, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, State and local governments, Sunshine Act, Technical assistance, Women, and Youth.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, under the authority at 5 U.S.C. 301, the Department of Health and Human Services amends 45 CFR subtitle A, subchapter B as set forth below.
PART 147--HEALTH INSURANCE REFORM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE GROUP AND INDIVIDUAL HEALTH INSURANCE MARKETS
0 1. The authority citation for part 147 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 300gg through 300gg-63, 300gg-91, 300gg- 92, and 300gg-111 through 300gg-139, as amended, and section 3203, Pub. L. 116-136, 134 Stat. 281.
0 2. Section 147.104 is amended by-- 0 a. Revising paragraphs (b)(2)(i)(E) and (F); 0 b. Removing paragraph (b)(2)(i)(G); and 0 c. Revising paragraph (i).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 147.104 Guaranteed availability of coverage.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
(E) Section 155.420(d)(12) of this subchapter (concerning plan and benefit display errors); and
(F) Section 155.420(d)(13) of this subchapter (concerning eligibility for insurance affordability programs or enrollment in the Exchange). * * * * *
(i) Coverage denials for failure to pay premiums for prior coverage. To the extent permitted by applicable State law, a health insurance issuer may deny coverage to an individual or employer due to the individual's or employer's failure to pay premiums owed under a prior policy, certificate, or contract of insurance offered by the issuer (or, if the issuer is a member of a controlled group (as defined in Sec. 147.106(d)(4)), any other issuer that is member of such controlled group), including by attributing payment of premium for a new policy, certificate, or contract of insurance to the prior policy, certificate, or contract of insurance, provided the issuer applies its past-due premium payment policy uniformly to all individuals or employers in similar circumstances in the applicable market and State regardless of health status, and consistent with applicable nondiscrimination requirements, and does not condition the effectuation of new coverage on payment of past-due premiums by any individual other than the person contractually responsible for the payment of premium. The amount of the past-due premium an issuer may require for this purpose is subject to any premium payment threshold the issuer has adopted pursuant to Sec. 155.400(g) of this subchapter. The Secretary may specify additional clarifications of acceptable parameters for coverage denials for failure to pay premiums for prior coverage in guidance. * * * * *
PART 155--EXCHANGE ESTABLISHMENT STANDARDS AND OTHER RELATED STANDARDS UNDER THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT
0 3. The authority citation for part 155 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 18021-18024, 18031-18033, 18041-18042, 18051, 18054, 18071, and 18081-18083.
0 4. Section 155.20 is amended by-- 0 a. In the definition of “Lawfully present”, revising paragraph (9) and adding paragraph (14); and 0 b. Adding a definition of “Preponderance of the evidence” in alphabetical order.
The revision and additions read as follows:
Sec. 155.20 Definitions.
* * * * *
Lawfully present * * *
(9) Is granted deferred action; * * * * *
(14) An individual with deferred action under the Department of Homeland Security's Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals process, as described at 8 CFR 236.22, shall not be considered to be lawfully present as described in any of the above categories in paragraphs (1) through (13) of this definition. * * * * *
Preponderance of the evidence means proof by evidence that, compared with evidence opposing it, leads to the conclusion that the fact at issue is more likely true than not. * * * * *
0 5. Section 155.220 is amended by revising paragraph (g)(2) introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 155.220 Ability of States to permit agents and brokers and web- brokers to assist qualified individuals, qualified employers, or qualified employees enrolling in QHPs.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(2) An agent, broker, or web-broker may be determined noncompliant under paragraph (g)(1) of this section if HHS finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the agent, broker, or web-broker violated-- * * * * *
0 6. Section 155.305 is amended by revising paragraph (f)(4) introductory text and adding paragraph (f)(4)(iii) to read as follows:
Sec. 155.305 Eligibility standards.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(4) Compliance with filing requirement. Except as set forth in paragraph (f)(4)(iii) of this section, the Exchange may not determine a tax filer eligible for advance payments of the premium tax credit (APTC) if HHS notifies the Exchange as part of the process described in Sec. 155.320(c)(3) that APTC payments were made on behalf of either the tax filer or spouse, if the tax filer is a married couple, for 2- consecutive years for which tax data would be utilized for verification of household income and family size in accordance with Sec. 155.320(c)(1)(i), and the tax filer or the tax filer's spouse did not comply with the requirement to file an income tax return for that year and for the previous year as required by 26 U.S.C. 6011, 6012, and in 26 CFR chapter I, and reconcile APTC for that period. * * * * *
(iii) For plan year 2026 only, an Exchange may not determine a tax filer eligible for APTC if HHS notifies the Exchange as part of the process described in Sec. 155.320(c)(3) that APTC payments were made on behalf of the tax filer or either spouse, if the tax filer is a married couple, for a year for which tax data would be utilized for verification of household income and family size in accordance with Sec. 155.320(c)(1)(i), and the tax filer or the tax filer's spouse did not comply with the requirement to file an income tax return for that year as required by 26 U.S.C. 6011, 6012 and implementing regulations, and reconcile the advance payments of the premium tax credit for that period.
(A) If HHS notifies the Exchange as part of the process described in Sec. 155.320(c)(3) that APTC payments were made on behalf of either the tax filer or spouse, if the tax filer is a married couple, for a year for which tax data would be utilized for verification of household income and family size in accordance with Sec. 155.320(c)(1)(i), and the tax filer or the tax filer's spouse did not comply with the requirement to file an income tax return for that year as required by 26 U.S.C. 6011, 6012, and their implementing regulations and reconcile APTC for that period (“file and reconcile”), the Exchange must:
(1) Send a notification to the tax filer, consistent with the standards applicable to the protection of Federal Tax Information, that directly informs the tax filer that the Exchange has determined that the tax filer or the tax filer's spouse, if the tax filer is married, has failed to file and reconcile, and educate the tax filer of the need to file and reconcile or risk being determined ineligible for APTC if they fail to file and reconcile immediately upon receipt of notice; or
(2) Send a notification to either the tax filer or their enrollee, that informs the tax filer or enrollee that they may be at risk of being determined ineligible for APTC for the applicable coverage year. These notices must educate tax filers or their enrollees on the requirement to file and reconcile, while not directly stating that the IRS indicates the tax filer or their enrollee, or the tax filer's spouse, if the tax filer is married, has failed to file and reconcile.
(B) [Reserved] * * * * *
Sec. 155.315 [Amended]
0 7. Section 155.315 is amended by removing paragraph (f)(7).
0 8. Section 155.320 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(3)(iii)(A), adding paragraph (c)(3)(vi)(C)(2), and revising (c)(5) to read as follows:
Sec. 155.320 Verification process related to eligibility for insurance affordability programs.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) * * *
(A) For plan years before plan year 2027, except as specified in paragraphs (c)(3)(iii)(B), (C), and (D) of this section, if an applicant's attestation to projected annual household income, as described in paragraph (c)(3)(ii)(B) of this section, would qualify the tax payer as an applicable taxpayer according to 26 CFR 1.36B-2(b) for the plan year for which coverage is requested and is more than a reasonable threshold above the annual household income computed in accordance with paragraph (c)(3)(ii)(A) of this section, the data described in paragraph (c)(3)(ii)(A) of this section indicates that projected annual household income is under 100 percent of the FPL, and the Exchange has not verified the applicant's MAGI-based income through the process specified in paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section to be within the applicable Medicaid or CHIP MAGI-based income standard, the Exchange must proceed in accordance with Sec. 155.315(f)(1) through (4). However, this paragraph does not apply if the applicant is a non- citizen who is lawfully present and ineligible for Medicaid by reason of immigration status through the process specified in Sec. 155.305(f)(2). For the purposes of this paragraph, a reasonable threshold is established by the Exchange in guidance and approved by HHS, but must not be less than 10 percent, and can also include a threshold dollar amount. * * * * *
(vi) * * *
(C) * * *
(2) For plan years before plan year 2027, if the data described in paragraph (c)(3)(vi)(A) of this section indicates that projected annual household income is under 100 percent of the FPL and the applicant's attestation to projected household income, as described in paragraph (c)(3)(ii)(B) of this section, would qualify the tax payer as an applicable taxpayer according to 26 CFR 1.36B-2(b) for the plan year for which coverage is requested and is more than a reasonable threshold above the annual household income as computed using data sources described in paragraph (c)(3)(vi)(A) of this section, in which case the Exchange must follow the procedures specified in Sec. 155.315(f)(1) through (4). The reasonable threshold used under this paragraph must be equal to the reasonable threshold established in accordance with paragraph (c)(3)(iii)(D) of this section. * * * * *
(5) Acceptance of attestation. For plan years 2027 and after, notwithstanding any other requirement described in this paragraph (c) to the contrary, when the Exchange requests tax return data and family size from the Secretary of Treasury as described in paragraph (c)(1)(i)(A) of this section but no such data is returned for an applicant, the Exchange will accept that applicant's attestation of income and family size without further verification. * * * * *
0 9. Section 155.335 is amended by-- 0 a. Adding paragraph (a)(3); 0 b. Revising paragraphs (j)(1) introductory text and (j)(2) introductory text; 0 c. Removing paragraph (j)(4) and redesignating paragraph (j)(5) as paragraph (j)(4); and 0 d. Adding paragraph (n).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 155.335 Annual eligibility redetermination.
(a) * * *
(3) The annual redeterminations described in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section are subject to the requirements in paragraph (n) of this section. * * * * *
(j) * * *
(1) The product under which the QHP in which the enrollee is enrolled remains available through the Exchange for renewal, consistent with Sec. 147.106 of this subchapter, the Exchange will renew the enrollee in a QHP under that product, unless the enrollee terminates coverage, including termination of coverage in connection with voluntarily selecting a different QHP, in accordance with Sec. 155.430, or unless otherwise provided in paragraph (j)(1)(iii)(A) of this section, as follows: * * * * *
(2) No plans under the product under which the QHP in which the enrollee is enrolled are available through the Exchange for renewal, consistent with Sec. 147.106 of this subchapter, the Exchange will enroll the enrollee in a QHP under a different product offered by the same QHP issuer, to the extent permitted by applicable State law, unless the enrollee terminates coverage, including termination of coverage in connection with voluntarily selecting a different QHP, in accordance with Sec. 155.430, as follows: * * * * *
(n) Additional consumer protections. For benefit year 2026 annual redeterminations, if an enrollee does not submit an application for an updated eligibility determination for the immediately forthcoming coverage year (2026) on or before the last day on which a plan selection must be made for coverage effective January 1, 2026, in accordance with the effective dates specified in Sec. 155.410(f), and the enrollee's portion of the premium for a policy after the application of advance payments of the premium tax credit through the annual redetermination process would be zero dollars, the Exchange on the Federal platform must decrease the amount of the advance payment applied to the policy such that the remaining monthly premium owed for the policy equals $5.
0 10. Section 155.400 is amended by revising paragraph (g) introductory text, paragraph (g)(2), and paragraph (g)(3) introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 155.400 Enrollment of qualified individuals into QHPs.
* * * * *
(g) Premium payment threshold. Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, Exchanges may, and the Federally-facilitated Exchanges and State-Based Exchanges on the Federal platform will, until December 31, 2026, allow issuers to implement a percentage-based premium payment threshold policy which can be based on the net premium after application of advance payments of the premium tax credit, provided that the threshold policy is applied in a uniform manner to all applicants and enrollees. Effective beginning January 1, 2027, an Exchange may allow issuers to implement a percentage-based premium payment threshold policy (which can be based on either the net premium after application of advance payments of the premium tax credit or gross premium) and/or a fixed-dollar premium payment threshold policy, provided that the threshold and policy are applied in a uniform manner to all applicants and enrollees. * * * * *
(2) Effective beginning January 1, 2027, under a gross premium percentage-based premium payment threshold policy, issuers can consider enrollees to have paid all amounts due for the following purposes, if the enrollees pay an amount sufficient to maintain a percentage of the gross premium of the policy before the application of advance payments of the premium tax credit that is equal to or greater than 98 percent of the gross monthly premium owed by the enrollees. If an enrollee satisfies the gross premium percentage-based premium payment threshold policy, the issuer may:
(i) Avoid triggering a grace period for non-payment of premium, as described by Sec. 156.270(d) of this subchapter or a grace period governed by State rules.
(ii) Avoid terminating the enrollment for non-payment of premium as, described by Sec. Sec. 156.270(g) of this subchapter and 155.430(b)(2)(ii)(A) and (B).
(3) Effective beginning January 1, 2027, under a fixed-dollar premium payment threshold policy, issuers can consider enrollees to have paid all amounts due for the following purposes, if the enrollees pay an amount that is less than the total premium owed, the unpaid remainder of which is equal to or less than a fixed-dollar amount of $10 or less, adjusted for inflation, as prescribed by the issuer. If an enrollee satisfies the fixed-dollar premium payment threshold policy, the issuer may: * * * * *
0 11. Section 155.410 is amended by-- 0 a. Revising paragraph (e)(4) introductory text; 0 b. Adding paragraph (e)(5); 0 c. Revising paragraph (f)(3) introductory text; and 0 d. Adding paragraph (f)(4).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 155.410 Initial and annual open enrollment periods.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(4) For benefit years beginning on January 1, 2022, through January 1, 2026-- * * * * *
(5) For benefit years beginning on or after January 1, 2027--
(i) The annual open enrollment period for all Exchanges must begin no later than November 1 and must end no later than December 31 of the calendar year preceding the benefit year.
(ii) The annual open enrollment period must not exceed 9 weeks in duration.
(f) * * *
(3) For benefit years beginning on January 1, 2022, through January 1, 2026, the Exchange must ensure that coverage is effective-- * * * * *
(4) For benefit years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, the Exchange must ensure that coverage is effective January 1, for QHP selections received by the Exchange on or before December 31 of the calendar year preceding the benefit year. * * * * *
0 12. Section 155.420 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(4)(ii)(D), (a)(4)(iii) introductory text, (b)(2)(vii), (d)(16), and (g) to read as follows:
Sec. 155.420 Special enrollment periods.
(a) * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) * * *
(D) Beginning plan year 2027, if an enrollee or his or her enrolled dependents qualify for a special enrollment period in accordance with paragraph (d)(16) of this section, the Exchange must allow the enrollee and his or her enrolled dependents to change to any available silver- level QHP if they elect to change their QHP enrollment. If a qualified individual or a dependent who is not an enrollee qualifies for a special enrollment period in accordance with paragraph (d)(16) of this section and has one or more household members who are enrollees, the Exchange must allow the enrollee to add the newly enrolling household
member to his or her current QHP; or, to change to a silver-level QHP and add the newly enrolling household member to this silver-level QHP; or, to change to a silver level QHP and enroll the newly enrolling qualified individual or dependent in a separate QHP;
(iii) For the other triggering events specified in paragraph (d) of this section, except for paragraphs (d)(2)(i), (d)(4), and (d)(6)(i) and (ii) of this section for becoming newly eligible or ineligible for CSRs, and paragraphs (d)(8), (9), (10), (12), and (14) of this section, and beginning in plan year 2027, paragraph (d)(16) of this section: * * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(vii) Beginning plan year 2027, if a qualified individual or enrollee, or the dependent of a qualified individual or enrollee, who is eligible for advance payments of the premium tax credit, and whose household income, as defined in 26 CFR 1.36B-1(e), is expected to be no greater than 150 percent of the Federal poverty level, enrolls in a QHP or changes from one QHP to another one time per month in accordance with paragraph (d)(16) of this section, the Exchange must ensure that coverage is effective in accordance with paragraph (b)(1) of this section or on the first day of the month following plan selection, at the option of the Exchange. * * * * *
(d) * * *
(16) Beginning plan year 2027, at the option of the Exchange, a qualified individual or enrollee, or the dependent of a qualified individual or enrollee, who is eligible for advance payments of the premium tax credit, and whose household income, as defined in 26 CFR 1.36B-1(e), is expected to be at or below 150 percent of the Federal poverty level, may enroll in a QHP or change from one QHP to another one time per month. * * * * *
(g) Special enrollment period verification. Beginning January 1, 2026 unless a request for modification is granted in accordance with Sec. 155.315(h), Exchanges on the Federal platform must conduct pre- enrollment verification of applicants' eligibility for special enrollment periods under this section. An Exchange meets this requirement if it verifies eligibility each plan year for the number of individuals newly enrolling in Exchange coverage through special enrollment periods that equals at least 75 percent of all special enrollments based on prior year enrollments. If the Exchange is unable to verify eligibility for individuals newly enrolling in Exchange coverage through a special enrollment period for which the Exchange requires verification, then the individuals are not eligible for enrollment through the Exchange. In accordance with Sec. 155.505(b)(1)(iii), individuals have the right to appeal the eligibility determination. This requirement will apply through December 31st 2026, unless it is renewed through rulemaking prior to that date.
PART 156--HEALTH INSURANCE ISSUER STANDARDS UNDER THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT, INCLUDING STANDARDS RELATED TO EXCHANGES
0 13. The authority citation for part 156 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 18021-18024, 18031-18032, 18041-18042, 18044, 18054, 18061, 18063, 18071, 18082, and 26 U.S.C. 36B.
0 14. Section 156.115 is amended by revising paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 156.115 Provision of EHB.
* * * * *
(d) For plan years beginning before January 1, 2026, an issuer of a plan offering EHB may not include routine non-pediatric dental services, routine non-pediatric eye exam services, long-term/custodial nursing home care benefits, or non-medically necessary orthodontia as EHB. For plan years beginning on any day in calendar year 2026, an issuer of a plan offering EHB may not include routine non-pediatric dental services, routine non-pediatric eye exam services, long-term/ custodial nursing home care benefits, non-medically necessary orthodontia, or specified sex-trait modification procedures (as defined at Sec. 156.400) as EHB. For plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, an issuer of a plan offering EHB may not include routine non- pediatric eye exam services, long-term/custodial nursing home care benefits, non-medically necessary orthodontia, or specified sex-trait modification procedures (as defined at Sec. 156.400) as EHB.
0 15. Section 156.140 is amended by revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 156.140 Levels of coverage.
* * * * *
(c) De minimis variation. (1) The allowable variation in the AV of a health plan that does not result in a material difference in the true dollar value of the health plan is -4 percentage points and +2 percentage points, except if a health plan under paragraph (b)(1) of this section (a bronze health plan) either covers and pays for at least one major service, other than preventive services, before the deductible or meets the requirements to be a high deductible health plan within the meaning of section 223(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code, in which case the allowable variation in AV for such plan is -4 percentage points and +5 percentage points.
(2) [Reserved.]
0 16. Section 156.200 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 156.200 QHP issuer participation standards.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) Ensure that each QHP complies with benefit design standards, as defined in Sec. 156.20; * * * * *
0 17. Section 156.400 is amended by revising the definition of “De minimis variation for a silver plan variation” and adding a definition of “Specified sex-trait modification procedure” in alphabetical order to read as follows:
Sec. 156.400 Definitions.
* * * * *
De minimis variation for a silver plan variation means a -1- percentage point and +1-percentage point allowable AV variation. * * * * *
Specified sex-trait modification procedure means any pharmaceutical or surgical intervention that is provided for the purpose of attempting to align an individual's physical appearance or body with an asserted identity that differs from the individual's sex either by:
(1) Intentionally disrupting or suppressing the normal development of natural biological functions, including primary or secondary sex- based traits; or
(2) Intentionally altering an individual's physical appearance or body, including amputating, minimizing or destroying primary or secondary sex-based traits such as the sexual and reproductive organs.
(3) This term does not include procedures undertaken:
(i) To treat a person with a medically verifiable disorder of sexual development; or
(ii) For purposes other than attempting to align an individual's physical appearance or body with an
asserted identity that differs from the individual's sex. * * * * *
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services. [FR Doc. 2025-11606 Filed 6-23-25; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
← 10. Premium Payment Threshold (Sec. 155.400(g)) to E. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)Contents
- The rule itself
Health and Human Services Department, “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Marketplace Integrity and Affordability,” 90 FR 27074 (June 25, 2025). Effective August 25, 2025.
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/06/25/2025-11606/patient-protection-and-affordable-care-act-marketplace-integrity-and-affordability - This page
“Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Marketplace Integrity and Affordability,” the text from “F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)” to “List of Subjects.” Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/rules/rule-2025-11606/text-7/ (retrieved August 27, 2026).
Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.
How This Rule Is Set Out
Federal Register documents are United States government works and are not under copyright, so the rule is here whole rather than cut to an excerpt. It is split at the headings the Register itself prints: the line it is filed under, the captioned fields on its face, the preamble where the agency says what it is doing and why, and the amendments to the Code of Federal Regulations. No passage is shortened.
Two things the Register prints are not reproduced: the running head it repeats at every page break, and the tables it sets as pictures rather than as words. Its own marker for one of those tables, [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED], is left standing where the table was, so a reader can see that something is there and follow the link to the page it is on.
Every heading in the rule is listed on the rule's own page, which says which of these pages each one is on.