Documents › Agency rules › 2025-20907 › Text 4 of 29
Health and Human Services Department, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of the Secretary
Medicare Program: Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Systems; Quality Reporting Programs; Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating; Hospital Price Transparency; and Notice of Closure of a Teaching Hospital and Opportunity To Apply for Available Slots
The text of the rule, page 4 of 29. 17 headings, 18,654 words, quoted as the Federal Register prints them.
← B. Final Conversion Factor Update to III. OPPS Ambulatory Payment Classification (APC) Group PoliciesContentsn. Optellum Lung Cancer Prediction (LCP) (APC 1508) to 17. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) Procedure, HCPCS Code C9779 (APC 5303) →
A. OPPS Treatment of New and Revised HCPCS Codes
Payments for OPPS procedures, services, and items are generally based on medical billing codes, specifically, Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes, that are reported on hospital outpatient department (HOPD) claims. HCPCS codes are used to report surgical procedures, medical services, items, and supplies under the hospital OPPS. The HCPCS is divided into two principal subsystems, referred to as Level I and Level II of the HCPCS. Level I is comprised of CPT (Current Procedural Terminology) codes, a numeric and alphanumeric coding system that is established and maintained by the American Medical Association (AMA), and consists of Category I, II, III, MAAA, and PLA CPT codes. Level II, which is established and maintained by CMS, is a standardized coding system that is used primarily to identify products, supplies, and services not included in the CPT codes. Together, Level I and II HCPCS codes are used to report procedures, services, items, and supplies under the OPPS payment system. Specifically, we recognize the following codes on OPPS claims:
Category I CPT codes, which describe surgical procedures, diagnostic and therapeutic services, and vaccine codes;
Category III CPT codes, which describe new and emerging technologies, services, and procedures;
MAAA CPT codes, which describe laboratory multianalyte assays with algorithmic analyses (MAA);
PLA CPT codes, which describe proprietary laboratory analyses (PLA) services; and
Level II HCPCS codes (also known as alpha-numeric codes), which are used primarily to identify drugs, devices, supplies, temporary procedures, and services not described by CPT codes.
The codes are updated and changed throughout the year. CPT and Level II HCPCS code changes that affect the OPPS are published through the annual rulemaking cycle and through the OPPS quarterly update Change Requests (CRs). Generally, these code changes are effective January 1, April 1, July 1, or October 1. CPT code changes are released by the AMA (via their website) while Level II HCPCS code changes are released to the public via the CMS HCPCS website. CMS recognizes the release of new CPT and Level II HCPCS codes outside of the formal rulemaking process via OPPS quarterly update CRs. Based on our review, we assign the new codes to interim status indicators (SIs) and APCs. These interim assignments are finalized in the OPPS/ASC final rules. This quarterly process offers hospitals access to codes that more accurately describe the items or services furnished and provides payment for these items or services in a timelier manner than if we waited for the annual rulemaking process. We solicit public comments on the new CPT and Level II HCPCS codes, status indicators, and APC assignments through our annual rulemaking process.
We note that, under the OPPS, the APC assignment determines the payment rate for an item, procedure, or service. The items, procedures, or services not exclusively paid separately under the hospital OPPS are assigned to appropriate status indicators. Certain payment status indicators provide separate payment while other payment status indicators do not. In section XI. “CY 2026 Payment Status and Comment Indicators” of this final rule with comment period, we discuss the various status indicators and comment indicators used under the OPPS. We also provide a complete list of the status indicators and their definitions in Addendum D1 to this final rule with comment period. 1. April 2025 HCPCS Codes Proposed Rule Comment Solicitation
For the April 2025 update, 104 new HCPCS codes were established and made effective on April 1, 2025. Through the April 2025 OPPS quarterly update CR (Transmittal 13135, Change Request 13993, dated March 20, 2025), we recognized several new HCPCS codes for payment under the OPPS. We solicited public comments on the proposed APC and status indicator assignments for the codes listed in Table 9 (New HCPCS Codes Effective April 1, 2025) of the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule (90 FR 33525 through 33528), which are also displayed in Table 12.
We received some public comments on the proposed OPPS APC and SI assignments for the new Level II HCPCS codes that were effective on April 1, 2025. The comments and our responses are addressed in the applicable sections of this final rule with comment period, which include, but are not limited to sections III.C. (New Technology APCs); III.E. (OPPS APC-Specific Policies); and IV. (OPPS Payment for Devices). For
those April 2025 codes for which we received no comments, we are finalizing the proposed APC and status indicator assignments as proposed. In addition, in prior years we included the final OPPS status indicators and APC assignments in the coding preamble tables, however, because the same information can be found in Addendum B, we no longer include them in Table 12. Therefore, readers are advised to refer to the OPPS Addendum B for the final OPPS status indicators, APC assignments, and payment rates for all codes reportable under the hospital OPPS. These new codes that were effective April 1, 2025, were assigned to comment indicator “NP” in Addendum B to the CY 2026 OPPS/ APC proposed rule to indicate that the codes are assigned to an interim APC assignment and comments would be accepted on their interim APC assignments. The complete list of status indicators and definitions used under the OPPS can be found in Addendum D1 to this final rule with comment period, while the complete list of comment indicators and definitions can be found in Addendum D2 to this final rule with comment period. We note that OPPS Addendum B (OPPS payment file by HCPCS code), Addendum D1 (OPPS Status Indicators), and Addendum D2 (OPPS Comment Indicators) are available via the internet on the CMS website. BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.019
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.020
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.021
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.022
BILLING CODE 4120-01-C 2. July 2025 HCPCS Codes Proposed Rule Comment Solicitation
For the July 2025 update, 110 new codes were established and made effective July 1, 2025. Through the July 2025 OPPS quarterly update CR (Transmittal 13258, Change Request 14091, dated June 23, 2025) we recognized several new codes for payment and assigned them to appropriate interim OPPS status indicators and APCs. We solicited public comments on the proposed APC and status indicator assignments for the codes listed in Table 10 (New HCPCS Codes Effective July 1, 2025) of the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule (90 FR 33529 through 33533), which are also listed in Table 13.
We received some public comments on the proposed OPPS APC and SI assignments for the new Level II HCPCS codes implemented on July 1, 2025. The comments and our responses are addressed in pertinent sections of this final rule with comment period, which include, but are not limited to sections III.C (New Technology APCs); III.E (OPPS APC- Specific Policies); and IV (OPPS Payment for Devices). For those July 1, 2025, codes for which we received no comments, we are finalizing the proposed APC and status indicator assignments. Additionally, we note that in prior years we included the final OPPS status indicators and APC assignments in the coding preamble tables, however, because the same information can be found in Addendum B, we no longer include them in Table 13. Therefore, readers are advised to refer to the OPPS Addendum B for the final OPPS status indicators, APC assignments, and payment rates for all codes reportable under the OPPS. These new codes that were effective July 1, 2025, were assigned to comment indicator “NP” in Addendum B to the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule to indicate that the codes are assigned to an interim APC assignment and comments would be accepted on their interim APC assignments. The complete list of status indicators and definitions used under the OPPS can be found in Addendum D1 to this final rule with comment period, while the complete list of comment indicators and definitions can be found in Addendum D2 to this final rule with comment period. We note that OPPS Addendum B (OPPS payment file by HCPCS code), Addendum D1 (OPPS Status Indicators), and Addendum D2 (OPPS Comment Indicators) are available via the internet on the CMS website. BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.023
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.024
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.025
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.026
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.027
BILLING CODE 4120-01-C
3. October 2025 HCPCS Codes Final Rule Comment Solicitation
For the October 2025 update, 100 codes were established and made effective October 1, 2025. Through the October 2025 OPPS quarterly update CR (Transmittal 13425, Change Request 14223, dated September 22, 2025), we recognized several new codes for separate payment and assigned them to appropriate interim OPPS status indicators and APCs. For CY 2026, consistent with our established policy, we proposed in the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule (90 FR 33533) that the HCPCS codes that would be effective October 1, 2025, would be flagged with comment indicator “N1” in Addendum B to the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period to indicate that we have assigned the codes to interim OPPS status indicators for CY 2026. Table 14 lists the codes that were effective October 1, 2025. We note that several of the temporary C- codes have been replaced with permanent J-codes effective January 1, 2026. We are inviting public comments in this final rule with comment period on the interim payment indicators, which will be finalized in the CY 2027 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period. We note the proposed APC assignments and status indicators for these same codes will be subject to comment in the CY 2027 OPPS/ASC proposed rule with comment period and will be finalized in the CY 2027 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period. BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.028
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.029
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.030
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.031
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.032
BILLING CODE 4120-01-C 4. January 2026 HCPCS Codes a. New Level II HCPCS Codes Final Rule Comment Solicitation
Consistent with past practice, we are soliciting comments on the new Level II HCPCS codes that will be effective January 1, 2026, in the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period, thereby allowing us to finalize the status indicators and APC assignments for the codes in the CY 2027 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period. Unlike the CPT codes that are effective January 1 and are included in the OPPS/ASC proposed rules, and except for the proposed new C-codes and G-codes listed in Addendum O of the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, most Level II HCPCS codes are not released until sometime around November to be effective January 1. Because these codes are not available until November, we were unable to include them in the OPPS/ASC proposed rules. Consequently, for CY 2026, we proposed to include the new Level II HCPCS codes that will be effective January 1, 2026 (that would be incorporated in the January 2026 OPPS quarterly update CR), in Addendum B to the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period. Specifically, for CY 2026, we proposed to continue our established policy of assigning comment indicator “N1” in Addendum B to this final rule with comment period to the new HCPCS codes that will be effective January 1, 2026, to indicate that we are assigning them an interim status indicator, which is subject to public comment. We are inviting public comments in this final rule with comment period on the status indicators and APC assignments, which would then be finalized in the CY 2027 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period. Similar to the codes effective October 1, 2025, the proposed APC assignments and status indicators for these new Level II HCPCS codes that will be effective January 1, 2026, will also be subject to comment in the CY 2027 OPPS/ ASC proposed rule, and will be finalized in the CY 2027 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period. b. New CPT Codes Proposed Rule Comment Solicitation
In the CY 2015 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period (79 FR 66841 through 66844), we finalized a revised process of assigning APC and status indicators for new and revised Category I and III CPT codes that would be effective January 1. Specifically, for the new/revised CPT codes that we receive in a timely manner from the AMA's CPT Editorial Panel, we finalized our proposal to include the codes that would be effective January 1 in the OPPS/ASC proposed rules, along with proposed APC and status indicator assignments for them, and to finalize the APC and status indicator assignments in the OPPS/ASC final rules beginning with the CY 2016 OPPS update. For those new/revised CPT codes that were received too late for inclusion in the OPPS/ASC proposed rule, we finalized our proposal to establish and use HCPCS G-codes that mirror the predecessor CPT codes and retain the current APC and status indicator assignments for a year until we can propose APC and status indicator assignments in the following year's rulemaking cycle. We note that even if we find that we need to create HCPCS G-codes in place of certain CPT codes for the PFS proposed rule, we do not anticipate that these HCPCS G-codes will always be necessary for OPPS purposes. We will make every effort to include proposed APC and status indicator assignments for all new and revised CPT codes that the AMA makes publicly available in time for us to include them in the proposed rule, and to avoid resorting to use of HCPCS G-codes and the resulting delay in utilization of the most current CPT codes. Also, we finalized our proposal to make interim APC and status indicator assignments for CPT codes that are not available in time for the proposed rule and that describe wholly new services (such as new technologies or new surgical procedures), to solicit public comments in the final rule, and
to finalize the specific APC and status indicator assignments for those codes in the following year's rule.
For the CY 2026 OPPS update, we received the CPT codes that will be effective January 1, 2026, from the AMA in time to be included in the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule. The new, revised, and deleted CPT codes can be found in Addendum B to the proposed rule (which is available via the internet on the CMS website). We note that the new and revised CPT codes are assigned to comment indicator “NP” in Addendum B to the proposed rule to indicate that the code is new for the next calendar year or the code is an existing code with substantial revision to its code descriptor in the next calendar year as compared to the current calendar year with a proposed APC assignment, and that comments would be accepted on the proposed APC assignment and status indicator.
Further, we noted that the CPT code descriptors that appeared in Addendum B were short descriptors and did not accurately describe the complete procedure, service, or item described by the CPT code. Therefore, we included the 5-digit placeholder codes and the long descriptors for the new and revised CY 2026 CPT codes in Addendum O to the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule (which is available via the internet on the CMS website) so that the public could adequately comment on the proposed APCs and SI assignments. The 5-digit placeholder codes were included in Addendum O to the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, specifically under the column labeled “CY 2026 OPPS/ASC Proposed Rule 5-Digit AMA/CMS Placeholder Code.” We noted that the final CPT code numbers would be included in this CY 2026 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period. We also noted that not every code listed in Addendum O is subject to public comment. For the new and revised Category I and III CPT codes, we requested public comments on only those codes that are assigned comment indicator “NP”.
In summary, in the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, we solicited public comments on the proposed CY 2026 status indicators and APC assignments for the new and revised CPT codes that would be effective January 1, 2026. The CPT codes listed in Addendum B to the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule appear with short descriptors only. We listed them again, with long descriptors, in Addendum O to the CY 2026 OPPS/ ASC proposed rule. We also proposed to finalize the status indicator and APC assignments for these codes (with their final CPT code numbers) in the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period. The proposed status indicator and APC assignments for these codes were included in Addendum B to the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule (which is available via the internet on the CMS website). We received comments on several of the new CPT codes that were assigned to comment indicator “NP” in Addendum B to the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule. We have responded to those public comments in sections III.C., III.E., and IV. of this final rule with comment period.
The final SIs, APC assignments, and payment rates for the new CPT codes that are effective January 1, 2026, can be found in Addendum B to this final rule with comment period. In addition, the SI definitions can be found in Addendum D1 to this final rule with comment period. Addenda B and D1 are available via the internet on the CMS website.
Finally, Table 15, which is a reprint of Table 11 from the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule (90 FR 33535), shows the comment timeframe for new and revised HCPCS codes. The table provides information on our current process for updating codes through our OPPS quarterly update CRs, seeking public comments, and finalizing the treatment of these codes under the OPPS. [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.033
B. OPPS Changes--Variations Within APCs
1. Background
Section 1833(t)(2)(A) of the Act requires the Secretary to develop a classification system for covered hospital outpatient department services. In addition, section 1833(t)(2)(B) of the Act provides that the Secretary may establish groups of covered OPD services within this classification system, so that services classified within each group are comparable clinically and with respect to the use of resources. In accordance with these provisions, we developed a grouping classification system, referred to as Ambulatory Payment Classifications (APCs), as set forth in regulations at 42 CFR 419.31. We use Level I (also known as CPT codes) and Level II HCPCS codes (also known as alphanumeric codes) to identify and group the services within each APC. The APCs are organized such that each group is homogeneous both clinically and in terms of resource use. Using this classification system, we have established distinct groups of similar services. We also have developed separate APC groups for certain medical devices, drugs, biologicals, therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals, and brachytherapy devices that are not packaged into the payment for the procedure.
We have packaged into the payment for each procedure or service within an APC group, the costs associated with those items and services that are typically ancillary and supportive to a primary diagnostic or therapeutic modality and, in those cases, are an integral part of the primary service they support. Therefore, we do not make separate payment for these packaged items or services. In general, packaged items and services include, but are not limited to, the items and services listed in regulations at 42 CFR 419.2(b). A further discussion of packaged services is included in section II.A.3. of this final rule with comment period.
Under the OPPS, we generally pay for covered hospital outpatient services on a rate-per-service basis, where the service may be reported with one or more HCPCS codes. Payment varies according to the APC group to which the independent service or combination of services is assigned. For CY 2026, we proposed that each APC relative payment weight represents the hospital cost of the services included in that APC, relative to the hospital cost of the services included in APC 5012 (Clinic Visits and Related Services). The APC relative payment weights are scaled to APC 5012 because it is the hospital clinic visit APC and clinic visits are among the most frequently furnished services in the hospital outpatient setting. 2. Application of the 2 Times Rule
Section 1833(t)(9)(A) of the Act requires the Secretary to review, not less often than annually, and revise the APC groups, the relative payment weights, and the wage and other adjustments described in section 1833(t)(2) of the Act to consider changes in medical practice, changes in technology, the addition of new services, new cost data, and other relevant information and factors. Section 1833(t)(9)(A) of the Act also requires the Secretary to consult with an expert outside advisory panel composed of an appropriate selection of representatives of providers to review (and advise the Secretary concerning) the clinical integrity of the APC groups and the relative payment weights. We note that the Advisory Panel on Hospital Outpatient Payment (also known as the HOP Panel or the Panel) recommendations for specific services for the CY 2026 OPPS update will be discussed in the relevant specific sections throughout this final rule with comment period.
In addition, section 1833(t)(2) of the Act provides that, subject to certain exceptions, the items and services within an APC group cannot be considered comparable regarding the use of resources if the highest cost for an item or service in the group is more than 2 times greater than the lowest cost for an item or service within the same group (referred to as the “2 times rule”). The statute authorizes the Secretary to make exceptions to the 2 times rule in unusual cases, such as for low-volume items and services (but the Secretary may not make such an exception in the case of a drug or biological that has been designated as an orphan drug under section 526 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act). In determining the APCs with a 2 times rule violation, we consider only those HCPCS codes that are significant based on the number of claims. We note that, for purposes of identifying significant procedure codes for examination under the 2 times rule, we consider procedure codes that have more than 1,000 single major claims or procedure codes that both have more than 99 single major claims and contribute at least 2 percent of the single major claims used to establish the APC cost to be significant (75 FR 71832). This longstanding definition of when a procedure code is significant for purposes of the 2 times rule was selected because we believe that a subset of 1,000 or fewer claims is negligible within the set of approximately 100 million single procedure or single session claims we use for establishing costs. Similarly, a procedure code for which there are fewer than 99 single claims and that comprises less than 2 percent of the single major claims within an APC will have a negligible impact on the APC cost (75 FR 71832). In the CY 2026 OPPS/ ASC proposed rule, we proposed to make exceptions to this limit on the variation of costs within each APC group in unusual cases, such as for certain low-volume items and services.
For the CY 2026 OPPS update, we identified the APCs with violations of the 2 times rule, and we proposed changes to the procedure codes assigned to these APCs (with the exception of those APCs for which we proposed a 2 times rule exception) in Addendum B to the CY 2026 OPPS/ ASC proposed rule. We note that Addendum B does not appear in the printed version of the Federal Register as part of this final rule with comment period. Rather, it is published and made available via the internet on the CMS website at https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/prospective-payment-systems/hospital-outpatient/regulations-notices.
To eliminate a violation of the 2 times rule and improve clinical and resource homogeneity in the APCs for which we did not propose a 2 times rule exception, we proposed to reassign these procedure codes to new APCs that contain services that are similar with regard to both their clinical and resource characteristics. In many cases, the proposed procedure code reassignments and associated APC reconfigurations for CY 2026 included in the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule are related to changes in costs of services that were observed in the CY 2024 claims data available for CY 2026 ratesetting. Addendum B to the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule identifies with a comment indicator “CH” those procedure codes for which we proposed a change to the APC assignment or status indicator, or both, that were initially assigned in the July 1, 2025, OPPS Addendum B Update, which is available via the internet on the CMS website at https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/prospective-payment-systems/hospital-outpatient/addendum-a-b-update. 3. APC Exceptions to the 2 Times Rule
While considering the APC changes that we proposed for CY 2026, we reviewed all of the APCs for which we identified 2 times rule violations to determine whether any of the APCs
would qualify for an exception. We used the following criteria to evaluate whether to propose exceptions to the 2 times rule for affected APCs:
Resource homogeneity;
Clinical homogeneity;
Hospital outpatient setting utilization;
Frequency of service (volume); and
Opportunity for upcoding and code fragments.
For a detailed discussion of these criteria, we refer readers to the April 7, 2000 final rule (65 FR 18457 through 18458).
Based on the CY 2024 claims data available for the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, we found 26 APCs with violations of the 2 times rule. We applied the criteria as described above to identify the APCs for which we proposed to make exceptions under the 2 times rule for CY 2026 and found that all of the 26 APCs we identified meet the criteria for an exception to the 2 times rule based on the CY 2024 claims data available for the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule. We note that, on an annual basis, based on our analysis of the latest claims data, we identify violations to the 2 times rule and propose changes when appropriate. Those APCs that violate the 2 times rule are identified and appear in Table 16. In addition, we did not include in that determination those APCs where a 2 times rule violation was not a relevant concept, such as APC 5401 (Dialysis), which only has two HCPCS codes assigned to it that have similar geometric mean costs and do not create a 2 times rule violation. Therefore, we have only identified those APCs, including those with criteria-based costs, such as device- dependent CPT/HCPCS codes, with violations of the 2 times rule, where a 2 times rule violation is a relevant concept.
Table 12 of the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule (90 FR 33537) listed the APCs for which we proposed to make an exception under the 2 times rule for CY 2026 based on the criteria cited above and claims data submitted between January 1, 2024, and December 31, 2024, and CCRs, if available. The proposed geometric mean costs for covered hospital outpatient services for these and all other APCs that were used in the development of the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule can be found via the internet on the CMS website at https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/prospective-payment-systems/hospital-outpatient/regulations-notices.
Based on the updated final rule CY 2024 claims data used for this final rule with comment period, we found a total of 27APCs with violations of the 2 times rule. Of these 27 total APCs, 24 were identified in the proposed rule and three are newly identified in this final rule with comment period. The following two APCs appeared in Table 12 of the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule (90 FR 33537) as violating the 2 times rule. However, after conducting data analysis for this final rule with comment period, we found that the APCs no longer violate the 2 times rule:
APC 5613 (Level 3 Therapeutic Radiation Treatment Preparation).
APC 5811 (Manipulation Therapy).
In addition, the following three APCs are newly identified with 2 times rule violations using updated data for this final rule with comment period:
APC 5024 (Level 4 Type A ED Visits).
APC 5052 (Level 2 Skin Procedures).
APC 5722 (Level 2 Diagnostic Tests and Related Services).
We received comments on the APCs located in Table 12 of the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule (90 FR 33537), along with comments on APC assignments for specific HCPCS codes. These comments and our responses can be found in section III.E. of this final rule with comment period.
Based on our analysis of the CY 2024 costs from hospital claims and cost report data available for this final rule with comment period, we are finalizing our proposals with some modifications. Specifically, we are finalizing our proposal to except the 24 proposed APCs that continue to have 2 times violations in this final rule with comment period data from the 2 times rule for CY 2024 claims data and also except three additional APCs that did not violate the 2 times rule in the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule data, but do violate the 2 times rule in this final rule with comment period data, for a total of 27APCs for which we identified 2 times rule violations but that qualify for exceptions.
In summary, Table 16 lists the 27 APCs that we are excepting from the 2 times rule for CY 2026 based on the criteria described earlier and a review of updated claims data for dates of service between January 1, 2024, and December 31, 2024, that were processed on or before June 30, 2025, and updated CCRs, if available. We note that, for cases in which a recommendation by the HOP Panel appears to result in or allow a violation of the 2 times rule, we generally accept the HOP Panel's recommendation because those recommendations are based on explicit consideration of resource use, clinical homogeneity, site of service, and the quality of the claims data used to determine the APC payment rates. The geometric mean costs for hospital outpatient services for these and all other APCs that were used in the development of this final rule with comment period can be found via the internet on the CMS website at https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/prospective-payment-systems/hospital-outpatient/regulations-notices.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.034
C. New Technology APCs
1. Background
In the CY 2002 OPPS final rule (66 FR 59903), we finalized changes to the time period in which a service can be eligible for payment under a New Technology APC. Beginning in CY 2002, we retain services within New Technology APC groups until we gather sufficient claims data to enable us to assign the service to an appropriate clinical APC. This policy allows us to move a service from a New Technology APC in less than 2 years if sufficient data are available. It also allows us to retain a service in a New Technology APC for more than 2 years if sufficient data upon which to base a decision for reassignment have not been collected.
We also adopted in the CY 2002 OPPS final rule the following criteria for assigning a complete or comprehensive service to a New Technology APC: (1) the service must be truly new, meaning it cannot be appropriately reported by an existing HCPCS code assigned to a clinical APC and does not appropriately fit within an existing clinical APC; (2) the service is not eligible for transitional pass-through payment (however, a truly new, comprehensive service could qualify for assignment to a new technology APC even if it involves a device or drug that could, on its own, qualify for pass-through payment); and (3) the service falls within the scope of Medicare benefits under section 1832(a) of the Act and is reasonable and necessary in accordance with section 1862(a)(1)(A) of the Act (66 FR 59898 through 59903). For additional information about our New Technology APC policy, we refer readers to https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/HospitalOutpatientPPS/passthroughpayment on the CMS website and then follow the instructions to access the MEARISTM system for OPPS New Technology APC applications.\15\
\15\ Currently approved under OMB control number 0938-0860; expires October 31, 2027.
In the CY 2004 OPPS final rule with comment period (68 FR 63416), we restructured the New Technology APCs to make the cost intervals more consistent across payment levels and refined the cost bands for these APCs to retain two parallel sets of New Technology APCs: one set with a status indicator of “S” (Significant Procedures, Not Discounted when Multiple. Paid under OPPS; separate APC payment) and the other set with a status indicator of “T” (Significant Procedure, Multiple Reduction Applies. Paid under OPPS; separate APC payment). These current New Technology APC configurations allow us to price new technology services more appropriately and consistently.
For CY 2025, there were 52 New Technology APC levels, ranging from the lowest cost band assigned to APC 1491 (New Technology--Level 1A ($0-$10)) to the highest cost band assigned to APC 1908 (New Technology--Level 52 ($145,001-$160,000)). We note that the cost bands for the New Technology APCs, specifically, APCs 1491 through 1599 and 1901 through 1908, vary with increments ranging from $10 to $14,999. These cost bands identify the APCs to which new technology procedures and services with estimated service costs that fall within those cost bands are
assigned under the OPPS. Payment for each APC is made at the mid-point of the APC's assigned cost band. For example, payment for APC 1507 (New Technology--Level 7 ($501-$600)) is made at $550.50.
Under the OPPS, one of our goals is to make payments that are appropriate for the services that are necessary for the treatment of Medicare beneficiaries. The OPPS, like other Medicare payment systems, is budget neutral and increases are limited to the annual hospital market basket increase reduced by the productivity adjustment. We believe that our payment rates reflect the costs that are associated with providing care to Medicare beneficiaries and are adequate to ensure access to services (80 FR 70374). For many emerging technologies, there is a transitional period during which utilization may be low, often because providers are first learning about the technologies and their clinical utility. Quite often, parties request that Medicare make higher payments under the New Technology APCs for new procedures in that transitional phase. These requests, and their accompanying estimates for expected total patient utilization, often reflect very low rates of patient use of expensive equipment, resulting in high per-use costs for which requesters believe Medicare should make full payment. Medicare does not, and we believe should not, assume responsibility for more than its share of the costs of procedures based on projected utilization for Medicare beneficiaries and does not set its payment rates based on initial projections of low utilization for services that require expensive capital equipment. For the OPPS, we rely on hospitals to make informed business decisions regarding the acquisition of high-cost capital equipment, taking into consideration their knowledge about their entire patient base (Medicare beneficiaries included) and an understanding of Medicare's and other payers' payment policies. We refer readers to the CY 2013 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period (77 FR 68314) for further discussion regarding this payment policy.
Some services assigned to New Technology APCs have low annual volume, which we consider to be fewer than 100 claims in the year of claims data used for ratesetting (86 FR 63528). Where utilization of services assigned to a New Technology APC is low, it can lead to wide variation in payment rates from year to year, resulting in even lower utilization and potential barriers to access of new technologies, which ultimately limits our ability to assign the service to the appropriate clinical APC. To mitigate these issues, we finalized a policy in the CY 2019 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period to utilize our equitable adjustment authority at section 1833(t)(2)(E) of the Act to adjust how we determine the costs for low-volume services assigned to New Technology APCs (83 FR 58892 through 58893). Specifically, in the CY 2019 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period (83 FR 58893), we established that, in each of our annual rulemakings, we would calculate and present the result of each statistical methodology (arithmetic mean, geometric mean, and median) based on up to 4 years of claims data and solicit public comment on which methodology should be used to establish the payment rate for the low-volume new technology service. In the CY 2022 OPPS/ASC final rule (86 FR 63529), we replaced the New Technology APC low volume policy with the universal low volume APC policy. Unlike the New Technology APC low volume policy, the universal low volume APC policy applies to clinical APCs and brachytherapy APCs, in addition to procedures assigned to New Technology APCs, and uses the highest of the geometric mean, arithmetic mean, or median based on up to 4 years of claims data to set the payment rate for the APC. We refer readers to the CY 2022 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period (86 FR 63529) for further discussion regarding this policy.
Despite the universal low volume APC policy, we continued to see payment instability for services with very low claims volume of fewer than 10 claims in the 4-year lookback period used under the universal low volume APC policy. For CY 2025, we finalized a policy to exempt services assigned to New Technology APCs with fewer than 10 claims over the 4-year lookback period used for the universal low volume policy. Instead of assigning these services to a different New Technology APC based on the very few claims available, we maintained the New Technology APC assignment for each service from the prior year, CY 2024. We refer readers to the CY 2025 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period for a discussion on the policy (89 FR 94016 through 94018).
Finally, we note that, in a budget-neutral system, payments may not fully cover hospitals' costs in a particular circumstance, including those for the purchase and maintenance of capital equipment. We rely on hospitals to make their decisions regarding the acquisition of high- cost equipment with the understanding that the Medicare program must be careful to establish its initial payment rates, including those made through New Technology APCs, for new services that lack hospital claims data based on realistic utilization projections for all such services delivered in cost-efficient hospital outpatient settings. As the OPPS acquires claims data regarding hospital costs associated with new procedures, we regularly examine the claims data and any available new information regarding the clinical aspects of new procedures to confirm that our OPPS payments remain appropriate for procedures as they transition into mainstream medical practice (77 FR 68314). For CY 2026, we included the proposed payment rates for New Technology APCs 1491 to 1599 and 1901 through 1908 in Addendum A to the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule (which is available on the CMS website at https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/HospitalOutpatientPPS/Hospital-Outpatient-Regulations-and-Notices. 2. Continue To Exempt Services With Under 10 Claims in the 4-Year Lookback Period From APC Reassignment Based on the Universal Low Volume Policy
We continue to be concerned about payment stability for services assigned to New Technology APCs, specifically services with fewer than 10 claims in the 4-year lookback period used under the universal low volume APC policy. We also continue to believe that determining initial cost estimates for these services may be particularly challenging, given the lack of cost information for new and innovative technologies, and that we generally utilize claims data from hospitals as soon as these data become available.
We proposed to continue our policy to exempt services assigned to New Technology APCs with fewer than 10 claims over the 4-year lookback period from the universal low volume policy. Instead of assigning these services to a different clinical or New Technology APC based on the very few claims available, we proposed to continue maintaining the New Technology APC assignment for each service from the prior year. For example, for CY 2026, services assigned to New Technology APCs with fewer than 10 claims in the previous 4 years would maintain their New Technology APC assignment from CY 2025. We proposed to continue this policy in future years, until, or unless, an alternative policy is finalized. We maintain that it is appropriate to apply this policy to services assigned to New Technology APCs because these services represent new technologies for which it
may be more challenging to determine an appropriate cost than for other, more established services. We continue to believe 10 claims is an appropriate ceiling for exempting services from reassignment based on the universal low volume APC policy because we believe that at 10 claims a rough standard distribution begins to appear. We also continue to believe that services with so few claims over the 4-year lookback period would be especially vulnerable to large changes in payment rates year-to-year as a result of one or two new claims being available or one or two claims from what was previously the fourth year of the lookback period no longer being included in that period.
Consistent with our overall policy regarding use of updated claims data in the final rule, we proposed to perform a similar analysis for the final rule using updated claims data, including determining whether specific HCPCS codes continue to meet the criteria for our universal low volume APC policy or would be subject to our proposed policy to continue exempting services with fewer than 10 claims in the 4-year lookback period from the universal low volume APC policy and maintain the New Technology APC assignment from the previous year. We would update the APC placement as needed in the final rule.
We received public comments on these proposals. The following is a summary of the comments we received and our responses.
Comment: Commenters generally supported our low volume APC policies. Comments were received regarding specific services assigned to New Technology APCs with low claims volume that supported maintaining the APC assignment as a result of our proposal to continue to exempt services assigned to New Technology APCs with fewer than 10 claims over the 4-year lookback period from the universal low volume policy.
Response: We thank the commenters for their support.
After consideration of public comments, we are finalizing our proposal to continue to exempt services assigned to New Technology APCs with fewer than 10 claims over the 4-year lookback period from the universal low volume policy. 3. Procedures Assigned to New Technology APC Groups for CY 2026
As we described in the CY 2002 OPPS final rule (66 FR 59902), we generally retain a procedure in the New Technology APC to which it is initially assigned until we have obtained sufficient claims data to justify reassignment of the procedure to a clinically appropriate APC. In addition, in cases where we find that our initial New Technology APC assignment was based on inaccurate or inadequate information (although it was the best information available at the time), where we obtain new information that was not available at the time of our initial New Technology APC assignment, or where the New Technology APCs are restructured, we may, based on more recent resource utilization information (including claims data) or the availability of refined New Technology APC cost bands, reassign the procedure or service to a different New Technology APC that more appropriately reflects its cost (66 FR 59903).
Consistent with our current policy, for CY 2026, we proposed to retain services within New Technology APC groups until we obtain sufficient claims data to justify reassignment of the service to an appropriate clinical APC. The flexibility associated with this policy allows us to reassign a service from a New Technology APC in less than 2 years if we have obtained sufficient claims data. It also allows us to retain a service in a New Technology APC for more than 2 years if we have not obtained sufficient claims data upon which to base a reassignment decision (66 FR 59902).
We received public comments on these proposals. The following is a summary of the comments we received and our responses.
Comment: A commenter stated that the New Technology APC pathway is vital for bringing innovative services to patients before sufficient claims data exist for permanent APC assignment and suggested that we incorporate the perspectives of patients and caregivers into our review to ensure payment decisions reflect unmet needs and treatment burdens.
Response: We thank the commenter for their comment. We note that we accept a variety of information as part of the New Technology APC application process.
After consideration of public comments, we are finalizing our proposal to retain services within New Technology APC groups until we obtain sufficient claims data to justify reassignment of the service to an appropriate clinical APC. a. Administration of Subretinal Therapies Requiring Vitrectomy (APC 1563)
Effective January 1, 2021, CMS established HCPCS code C9770 (Vitrectomy, mechanical, pars plana approach, with subretinal injection of pharmacologic/biologic agent) and assigned it to a New Technology APC based on the geometric mean cost of CPT code 67036 (Vitrectomy, mechanical, pars plana approach) due to similar resource utilization. For CY 2021, HCPCS code C9770 was assigned to APC 1561 (New Technology--Level 24 ($3001-$3500)). This code may be used to describe the administration of HCPCS code J3398 (Injection, voretigene neparvovec-rzyl, 1 billion vector genomes). This procedure was previously discussed in depth in the CY 2021 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period (85 FR 85939 through 85940). For CY 2022, we maintained the APC assignment of APC 1561 (New Technology--Level 24 ($3001-$3500)) for HCPCS code C9770 (86 FR 63531 through 63532).
HCPCS code J3398 (Injection, voretigene neparvovec-rzyl, 1 billion vector genomes) is for a gene therapy product indicated for a rare mutation-associated retinal dystrophy. Voretigene neparvovec-rzyl (Luxturna[supreg]) was approved by FDA in December of 2017 and is an adeno-associated virus vector-based gene therapy indicated for the treatment of patients with confirmed biallelic RPE65 mutation- associated retinal dystrophy.\16\ This therapy is administered through a subretinal injection, which interested parties describe as an extremely delicate and sensitive surgical procedure. The FDA-approved package insert describes one of the steps for administering Luxturna as, “after completing a vitrectomy, identify the intended site of administration. The subretinal injection can be introduced via pars plana.”
\16\ Luxturna. FDA Package Insert. Available: https://www.fda.gov/media/109906/download.
Interested parties, including the manufacturer of Luxturna[supreg], recommended CPT code 67036 (Vitrectomy, mechanical, pars plana approach) for the administration of the gene therapy.\17\ However, the manufacturer previously contended the administration was not accurately described by any existing codes as CPT code 67036 (Vitrectomy, mechanical, pars plana approach) does not account for the administration itself. CMS recognized the need to accurately describe the unique procedure that is required to administer the therapy described by HCPCS code J3398. Therefore, in the CY 2021 OPPS/ASC
final rule with comment period, we established a new HCPCS code, C9770 (Vitrectomy, mechanical, pars plana approach, with subretinal injection of pharmacologic/biologic agent) to describe this process. For CY 2021, we assigned HCPCS code C9770 to APC 1561 (New Technology--Level 24 ($3001-$3500)) using the geometric mean cost of CPT code 67036. For CY 2022, we continued to assign HCPCS code C9770 to APC 1561 (New Technology--Level 24 ($3001-$3500)) using the geometric mean cost of CPT code 67036.
\17\ LUXTURNA REIMBURSEMENT GUIDE FOR TREATMENT CENTERS. https://mysparkgeneration.com/uploads/2022/09/LUXTURNA-Reimbursement-Guide-for-Treatment-Centers-ISI-Update-April-2022-P-RPE65-US-320025.pdf.
CY 2023 was the first year that claims data were available for HCPCS code C9770; therefore, we proposed and finalized a policy to base the payment rate of HCPCS code C9770 on claims data for that code rather than on the geometric mean cost of CPT code 67036. Given the low number of claims for this procedure, we designated HCPCS code C9770 as a low volume procedure under our universal low volume APC policy and used the greater of the geometric mean, arithmetic mean, or median cost calculated based on the available claims data to calculate an appropriate payment rate for purposes of assigning HCPCS code C9770 to a New Technology APC.
Based on the claims data available for the CY 2023 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period, we found the median was the statistical methodology that estimated the highest cost for the service. The payment rate calculated using this methodology fell within the cost band for APC 1562 (New Technology--Level 25 ($3501-$4000)). Therefore, we finalized our proposal to assign HCPCS code C9770 to APC 1562 for CY 2023.
For CY 2024, we proposed and finalized that we would delete HCPCS code C9770 effective December 31, 2023 and recognize CPT code 0810T (Subretinal injection of a pharmacologic agent, including vitrectomy and 1 or more retinotomies) starting January 1, 2024 (88 FR 81617 through 81619). We determined the payment rate for CPT code 0810T using the claims data for HCPCS code C9770 and designated CPT code 0810T as a low volume procedure under our universal low volume APC policy and used the greater of the geometric mean, arithmetic mean, or median cost calculated based on the available claims data for HCPCS code C9770 to calculate an appropriate payment rate for purposes of assigning CPT code 0810T to a New Technology APC. For CY 2024, we finalized assignment of CPT code 0810T to APC 1563 (New Technology--Level 26 ($4001-$4500)) (88 FR 81617 through 81619). For 2025, claims data for CPT code 0810T was not yet available. Therefore, we continued to use claims data for HCPCS code C9770 to determine the appropriate APC for CPT code 0810T and finalized to continue to assign CPT code 0810T to APC 1563 for CY 2025.
CY 2026 is the first year that we have claims data available for CPT code 0810T, and there are 6 claims available. Since the procedure described by CPT code 0810T was billed using HCPCS code C9770 prior to January 1, 2024, we proposed to use the available combined 42 claims for both codes during this time period to allow for a more accurate picture of the costs associated with this procedure. For CY 2026, we proposed to designate CPT code 0810T as a low volume procedure under our universal low volume APC policy, given that there were only 42 combined claims available. This is below the threshold of 100 claims for a service within a year required to designate a service as a low volume service and apply our universal low volume APC policy. Therefore, we proposed to use the greater of the geometric mean, arithmetic mean, or median cost calculated based on the available claims data from a 4-year lookback period to calculate an appropriate payment rate for purposes of assigning CPT code 0810T to a New Technology APC.
Using all available claims for CPT code 0810T and HCPCS code C9770 from the 4-year lookback period, based on 42 claims, we determined the geometric mean cost to be approximately $4,040, the arithmetic mean cost to be $4,327, and the median cost to be $3,999. Because the arithmetic mean is the statistical methodology that estimated the highest cost for the service, we proposed to use this cost to determine the New Technology APC placement. The arithmetic mean of $4,327 falls within the cost band for APC 1563 (New Technology--Level 26 ($4001- $4500)). Therefore, we proposed to continue to assign CPT code 0810T to APC 1563 for CY 2026. Additionally, we proposed to perform a similar analysis using updated claims data, including determining if CPT code 0810T continues to meet the criteria for our universal low volume APC policy, in the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period and update the APC assignment as needed.
We did not receive any public comments on our proposal to continue to assign HCPCS code 0810T to APC 1563 for CY 2026.
One additional claim for CY 2024 has been processed since the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule. Our analysis of the updated claims data found that the greater of the geometric mean, arithmetic mean, or median cost calculated for HCPCS codes C9770 and 0810T is approximately $4,239. This continues to fall into the cost band of New Technology APC 1563. Therefore, we are finalizing our proposal without modification to continue to assign CPT code 0810T to APC 1563 (New Technology--Level 26 ($4001-$4500)).
Refer to Table 17 for the final OPPS New Technology APC and status indicator assignment for CPT codes 0810T for CY 2026. The final CY 2026 payment rates can be found in Addendum B to this final rule with comment period via the internet on the CMS website. In addition, we refer readers to Addendum D1 to this final rule with comment period for the status indicator meanings for all codes reported under the OPPS. Addendum D1 can also be found via the internet on the CMS website.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.035
b. BgRT (APC 1521 and 1525)
Biology Guided Radiation Therapy (BgRT) uses positron-emitting radiopharmaceuticals to control delivery of radiation therapy to treat primary and metastatic lung or bone tumors. During radiation treatment delivery, the same system applies these firing filters to the real-time positron emission tomography (PET) data collected by the radiation treatment delivery machine. Effective January 1, 2024, CMS created HCPCS codes C9794 (Therapeutic radiology simulation-aided field setting; complex, including acquisition of PET and CT imaging data required for radiopharmaceutical-directed radiation therapy treatment planning (i.e., modeling) and C9795 (Stereotactic body radiation therapy, treatment delivery, per fraction to 1 or more lesions, including image guidance and real-time positron emissions-based delivery adjustments to 1 or more lesions, entire course not to exceed 5 fractions) to describe the modeling and treatment delivery portions of the BgRT service. We assigned HCPCS code C9794 to APC 1521 (New Technology--Level 21 ($1901-$2000)) and HCPCS code C9795 to APC 1525 (New Technology--Level 25 ($3501-$4000)) for CY 2024.
For CY 2025, we continued to assign HCPCS code C9794 to APC 1521 (New Technology--Level 21 ($1901-$2000)) with a payment rate of $1,950.50 and HCPCS code C9795 to APC 1525 (New Technology--Level 25 ($3501-$4000)) with a payment rate of $3,750.50 because we did not have any claims data for the service.
Effective January 1, 2025, HCPCS codes C9794 and C9795 were replaced by HCPCS codes G0562 and G0563, respectively. For CY 2026, the proposed OPPS payment rates are based on available CY 2024 claims data. There are no CY 2024 claims for HCPCS codes G0562 and G0563 since they were not effective until CY 2025. However, as HCPCS codes C9794 and C9795 were still in use until December 31, 2024, we proposed to determine the payment rate for HCPCS codes G0562 and G0563 using the available claims data for HCPCS codes C9794 and C9795, respectively. For CY 2026, we proposed to designate HCPCS codes G0562 and G0563 as low volume procedures under our universal low volume APC policy, given that there are only 16 claims for C9794 and 28 claims for C9795 during the claims period. For HCPCS code G0562, using all available claims for C9794, we determined, for the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, the arithmetic mean cost to be $1,241, the median cost to be $1,203, and the geometric mean cost to be $1,121. Because the arithmetic mean cost is the statistical methodology that estimated the highest cost for the service, we proposed to use this cost to determine the New Technology APC placement. The arithmetic mean cost of $1,241 falls within the cost band for APC 1514 (New Technology--Level 14 ($1201-$1300)). Therefore, we proposed to assign HCPCS code G0562 to APC 1514 (New Technology-- Level 14 ($1201-$1300) with a payment rate of $1,250.50 for CY 2026. For HCPCS code G0563, using all available claims for C9795, we determined the arithmetic mean cost to be $3,606; the median cost to be $2,915, and the geometric mean cost to be $3,348. The arithmetic mean cost is the statistical methodology that estimated the highest cost for the service; therefore, we proposed to use this cost to determine the New Technology APC placement. The arithmetic mean cost of $3,606 falls within the cost band for APC 1525 (New Technology--Level 25 ($3501- $4000)). Therefore, we proposed to assign HCPCS code G0563 to APC 1525 (New Technology--Level 25 ($3501-$4000) with a payment rate of $3750.50 for CY 2026.
Additionally, we proposed to perform a similar analysis using updated claims data, including determining if HCPCS codes G0562 and G0563 continue to meet the criteria for our universal low volume APC policy, in the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period and update the APC assignments as needed.
We received public comments on these proposals. The following is a summary of the comments we received and our responses.
Comment: Commenters supported CMS' proposal to assign HCPCS code G0563 to APC 1525 (New Technology--Level 25 ($3501-$4000) with a payment rate of $3750.50 for CY 2026.
Response: We thank the commenters for their support.
Comment: Several commenters did not support the proposal to assign HCPCS code G0562 to APC 1514 (New Technology--Level 14 ($1201-$1300) with a payment rate of $1,250.50 for CY 2026. Commenters explained that the resulting decrease in payment would not cover the costs to provide the service, especially because the modeling service described by HCPCS code G0562 happens on a different day than the treatment, but on the same high-cost device as the treatment. Commenters emphasized the few single frequency claims available and urged CMS to allot hospitals more time to understand how costs for HCPCS code G0562 should be reported versus a diagnostic CT or PET scan that involves different equipment, workflows, and time. Commenters requested that we maintain the APC assignment for HCPCS code G0562 for CY 2026.
Response: We thank the commenters for their input. We agree with commenters who expressed concern that the proposed payment rate was based on an extremely limited number of claims and may not accurately reflect the true resource costs to hospitals associated with furnishing this service. Additionally, we are concerned that, if we were to finalize as proposed, the payment rate for this service would decrease 36 percent based on only 16 single frequency claims and only one year of claims data. As we have stated in prior rules, when only a limited number of claims are available for a given service, it is possible that those claims may not be representative of the full range of hospital costs. We
anticipate that, as hospitals gain additional experience furnishing the service and as more claims data becomes available in future years, the claims data will more accurately reflect the typical resource costs of the service.
We note that since the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule published, we have one additional claim for HCPCS code C9795 to use for HCPCS code G0563 ratesetting, and the revised statistical methodologies are: the geometric mean cost is $3,277, the arithmetic mean is $3,449, and the median is $3,228. The highest of these is the arithmetic mean, which falls outside of the proposed APC assignment of APC 1525 (New Technology--Level 25 ($3501-$4000)). After consideration of public comments and the revised statistical methodologies, we are not finalizing our proposals for HCPCS codes G0562 and G0563. For CY 2026, we are finalizing the assignment of HCPCS code G0562 to APC 1521 and status indicator “S” and HCPCS code G0563 to APC 1524 (New Technology--Level 24 ($3001-$3500)) and status indicator “S”. Refer to Table 18 for the final OPPS New Technology APC and status indicator assignment for HCPCS codes G0562 and G0563 for CY 2026. The final CY 2026 payment rates can be found in Addendum B to this final rule with comment period via the internet on the CMS website. In addition, we refer readers to Addendum D1 to this final rule with comment period for the status indicator meanings for all codes reported under the OPPS. Addendum D1 can also be found via the internet on the CMS website. [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.036
c. Blinded Procedure for NYHA Class III/IV Heart Failure (APC 1590)
A randomized, double-blinded, controlled IDE study was conducted for the V-Wave interatrial shunt. The V-Wave interatrial shunt is for patients with severe symptomatic heart failure and is designed to regulate left atrial pressure in the heart. All participants who passed initial screening for the study receive a right heart catheterization procedure described by CPT code 93451 (Right heart catheterization including measurement(s) of oxygen saturation and cardiac output, when performed). Participants assigned to the experimental group also receive the V-Wave interatrial shunt procedure while participants assigned to the control group only receive right heart catheterization. The developer of V-Wave was concerned that the current coding of these services by Medicare would reveal to the study participants whether they had received the interatrial shunt because an additional procedure code, CPT code 93799 (Unlisted cardiovascular service or procedure), would be included on the claims for participants receiving the interatrial shunt. Therefore, for CY 2020, we created a temporary HCPCS code to describe the V-Wave interatrial shunt procedure for both the experimental group and the control group in the study. Specifically, we established HCPCS code C9758 (Blinded procedure for NYHA class III/IV heart failure; transcatheter implantation of interatrial shunt or placebo control, including right heart catheterization, trans- esophageal echocardiography (TEE)/intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), and all imaging with or without guidance (for example, ultrasound, fluoroscopy), performed in an approved investigational device exemption (IDE) study) to describe the service, and we assigned the service to APC 1589 (New Technology--Level 38 ($10,001-$15,000)) with a payment rate of $12,500.50.
In the CY 2021 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period (85 FR 85946), we stated that we believe similar resources and device costs are involved with the V-Wave interatrial shunt procedure and the Corvia Medical interatrial shunt procedure (HCPCS code C9760), except that payment for HCPCS codes C9758 and C9760 differs based on how often the interatrial shunt is implanted when each code is billed. An interatrial shunt is implanted one-half of the time HCPCS code C9758 is billed, whereas an interatrial shunt is implanted every time HCPCS code C9760 is billed. Accordingly, for CY 2021, we reassigned HCPCS code C9758 to APC 1590 (New Technology--Level 39 ($15,001-$20,000)), which reflects the cost of furnishing the interatrial shunt one-half of the time the procedure is performed. Since CY 2021, HCPCS code C9758 has continued to be assigned to APC 1590.
For CY 2026, the developer of the V-Wave interatrial shunt informed us that the IDE study had concluded and HCPCS code C9758 was no longer being utilized. Therefore, we proposed to delete HCPCS code C9758 for CY 2026.
We received public comments on this proposal. The following is a summary of the comments we received and our responses.
Comment: A commenter requested that CMS not delete HCPCS code C9758, as Corvia Medical is conducting an ongoing clinical study that utilizes this code.
Response: Since HCPCS code C9758 is currently being utilized, we will continue to keep this code active for CY 2026. Therefore, we are not finalizing our proposal to delete HCPCS code C9758 for CY 2026.
Our updated claims data for the 4-year lookback period for the universal low volume APC policy shows only 8 claims for HCPCS code C9758. Because we are finalizing our proposal to maintain current New Technology APC assignments for CY 2026 for New Technology APC services with fewer than 10 claims in the 4-year lookback period, we are continuing to assign HCPCS code C9758 to APC 1590 for CY 2026. Refer to Table 19 for the final OPPS New Technology APC and status indicator assignment for HCPCS code C9758 for CY 2026. The final CY 2026 payment rates can be found in Addendum B to this final rule with comment period via the internet on the CMS website. In addition, we refer readers to Addendum D1 to this final rule with comment period for the status indicator meanings for all codes reported under the OPPS. Addendum D1 can also be found via the internet on the CMS website. [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.037
d. Bronchoscopy With Transbronchial Ablation of Lesion(s) by Microwave Energy (APC 1562)
Effective January 1, 2019, CMS established HCPCS code C9751 (Bronchoscopy, rigid or flexible, transbronchial ablation of lesion(s) by microwave energy, including fluoroscopic guidance, when performed, with computed tomography acquisition(s) and 3-D rendering, computer- assisted, image-guided navigation, and endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) guided transtracheal and/or transbronchial sampling (e.g., aspiration[s]/biopsy[ies]) and all mediastinal and/or hilar lymph node stations or structures and therapeutic intervention(s)). This microwave ablation procedure utilizes a flexible catheter to access the lung tumor via a working channel and may be used as an alternative procedure to a percutaneous microwave approach. Based on our review of the New Technology APC application for this service and the service's clinical similarity to existing services paid under the OPPS, we estimated the likely cost of the procedure would be between $8,001 and $8,500. We assigned the procedure to APC 1571 (New Technology--Level 34 ($8001- $8500)) for CY 2019.
In claims data available from CY 2019 for the CY 2021 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period, there were four claims reported for bronchoscopy with transbronchial ablation of lesions by microwave energy. Given the low volume of claims for the service, we proposed for CY 2021 to apply the universal low volume APC policy we adopted in CY 2019, under which we utilize our equitable adjustment authority under section 1833(t)(2)(E) of the Act to calculate the geometric mean, arithmetic mean, and median costs to determine an appropriate payment rate for purposes of assigning bronchoscopy with transbronchial ablation of lesions by microwave energy to a New Technology APC. Based on this analysis using claims from CY 2019, we assigned HCPCS code C9751 to APC 1562 (New Technology--Level 25 ($3501-$4000)) with a $3750.50 payment rate for CY 2021.
There have been no separately payable claims reported for HCPCS code C9751 since 2019. Therefore, we have continued to use claims from CY 2019 to determine the payment rate for this service in CY 2023, CY 2024, and CY 2025 OPPS/ASC final rules with comment period. Based on the information available, we continue to assign HCPCS code C9751 to APC 1562 (New Technology--Level 25 ($3501-$4000)), with a payment rate of $3,750.50.
For CY 2026, we were informed that the Neuwave Flex program is no longer available for commercial use, and that HCPCS code C9751 is no longer being utilized. Therefore, we proposed to delete HCPCS code C9751 for CY 2026.
We did not receive public comments on our proposal to delete HCPCS code C9751 for CY 2026. Additionally, our updated claims data remain unchanged. Therefore, we are finalizing as proposed.
Refer to Table 20 for the final OPPS New Technology APC and status indicator assignment for HCPCS code C9751 for CY 2026. In addition, we refer readers to Addendum D1 to this final rule with comment period for the status indicator meanings for all codes reported under the OPPS. Addendum D1 can also be found via the internet on the CMS website.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.038
e. Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) Studies (APCs 1519 and 1522)
For CY 2026, the OPPS payment rates for the service described by CPT codes 78431, 78432, and 78433 were proposed to be based on available CY 2024 claims data. CPT code 78431 had over 30,000 single frequency claims in CY 2024. The geometric mean cost for CPT code 78431 is approximately $2,200. The geometric mean falls within APC 1522 (New Technology--Level 22 ($2001-$2500)) with a payment rate of $2,250.50, which is the current APC assignment for this service. Therefore, we proposed, for CY 2026, to continue to assign CPT code 78431 to APC 1522 (New Technology--Level 22 ($2001-$2500)) with a payment rate of $2,250.50.
There were only 31 single frequency claims in CY 2024 for CPT code 78432. As this is below the threshold of 100 claims for a service within a year, we proposed to apply our universal low volume New Technology APC policy and use the highest of the geometric mean cost, arithmetic mean cost, or median cost based on up to 4 years of claims data to assign CPT code 78432 to the appropriate New Technology APC. Using available claims data from CY 2021, CY 2022, and CY 2023, our analysis found the geometric mean cost of the service is approximately $1,591, the arithmetic mean cost of the service is approximately $1,737, and the median cost of the service is approximately $1,364. The arithmetic mean is the statistical methodology that estimates the highest cost for the service. The arithmetic mean cost of $1,737, is an amount that is below the cost band for APC 1520 (New Technology--Level 20 ($1801-$1900)), where the procedure is currently assigned. Therefore, we proposed, for CY 2026, to assign CPT code 78432 to APC 1519 (New Technology--Level 19 ($1701-$1800)) with a payment rate of $1,750.50.
There were over 1,400 single frequency claims for CPT code 78433 in CY 2024. The geometric mean for CPT code 78433 is approximately $2,037, which is an amount that is above the current New Technology APC cost band APC 1521 (New Technology--Level 21 ($1901-$2000)) to which it is assigned. Therefore, for CY 2026, we proposed to reassign CPT code 78433 to APC 1522 (New Technology--Level 22 ($2001-$2500)) with a payment rate of $2,250.50.
We note that, over the past several years, the claims volumes for CPT codes 78431 and 78433 have increased significantly while the geometric mean costs of the codes have remained relatively stable. However, CPT code 78432, which is closely related to CPT codes 78431 and 78433, continues to have low claims frequency and fluctuating geometric mean costs. Due to our concerns regarding CPT code 78432 and the lack of an appropriate clinical APC for CPT codes 78431 and 78433 at this time based on resource cost similarity, we proposed to continue to assign CPT codes 78431 through 78433 to New Technology APCs for CY 2026.
We received public comments on these proposals. The following is a summary of the comments we received and our responses.
Comment: Commenters supported the proposed APC assignments for CPT codes 78431 and 78433 for CY 2026 based on our analysis of the available claims data.
Response: We thank the commenters for their support.
Comment: Some commenters did not support the proposed APC assignment for CPT code 78432 to APC 1519 (New Technology--Level 19 ($1701-$1800)) with a payment rate of $1,750.50. A commenter explained that CPT code 78432 consumes more resources than CPT code 78431. The commenter stated that with similar, but enhanced, clinical staff and radiotracer workflows to CPT code 78431, it is not appropriate for CPT code 78432 to be assigned to an APC with payments lower than CPT code 78431.
Response: As we have stated in previous rulemaking, New Technology APCs are cost bands rather than clinical groupings. Unlike when we assign a service to a clinical APC and consider resource and clinical similarities to other services in a clinical APC, we assign services to New Technology APCs based on cost. While we appreciate the commenter's information regarding the clinical differences between CPT codes 78431 and 78432, we adjust New Technology APC assignments based on the claims data available rather than clinical characteristics of a service.
We note that additional claims for CPT codes 78431 through 78433 have been processed since the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule. Based on updated claims data, CPT code 78431 has an updated geometric mean cost of approximately $2,182. Because the geometric mean cost of CPT code 78431 is still within the range for APC 1522, the proposed APC assignment for CPT code 78431 for CY 2026, we are finalizing the proposed APC assignment of CPT code 78431 without modification.
There were three additional single frequency claims for CY 2024 processed for CPT code 78432 since the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, bringing the total number of single frequency claims to 34 for CPT code 78432 for CY 2024. Based on the updated claims data for CPT code 78432, the geometric mean cost is approximately $1,428; the
arithmetic mean cost is approximately $1,517; and the median cost is approximately $1,274. Of these, the highest statistical methodology is the arithmetic mean cost of $1,517. Since the updated arithmetic mean cost for CPT code 78432 is outside of the cost band for APC 1519 (New Technology--Level 19 ($1701-$1800), we are not finalizing our proposal to assign CPT code 78432 to APC 1519 for CY 2026. Based on the updated statistical methodologies, we are assigning CPT code 78432 to APC 1517 for CY 2026 (New Technology--Level 17 ($1501-$1600)) with a payment rate of $1,550.50.
Based on updated claims data, CPT code 78433 has an updated geometric mean cost of approximately $2004. Because the geometric mean cost of CPT code 78433 is still within the range for APC 1522, the proposed APC assignment for CPT code 78433 for CY 2026, we are finalizing the proposed APC assignment of CPT code 78433 without modification.
Refer to Table 21 for the final OPPS New Technology APC and status indicator assignments for CPT codes 7843, 78432, and 78433 for CY 2026. The final CY 2026 payment rates can be found in Addendum B to this final rule with comment period via the internet on the CMS website. In addition, we refer readers to Addendum D1 to this final rule with comment period for the status indicator meanings for all codes reported under the OPPS. Addendum D1 can also be found via the internet on the CMS website. BILLING CODE 4120-01-P [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.039
BILLING CODE 4120-01-C f. CardiAMP (APC 1590)
The CardiAMP cell therapy IDE studies are two randomized, double- blinded, controlled IDE studies: the CardiAMP Cell Therapy Chronic Myocardial Ischemia Trial \18\ and the CardiAMP Cell Therapy Heart Failure
Trial.\19\ The two trials are designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell treatment for the following: (1) patients with medically refractory and symptomatic ischemic cardiomyopathy; and (2) patients with refractory angina pectoris and chronic myocardial ischemia. On April 1, 2022, we established HCPCS code C9782 to describe the CardiAMP cell therapy IDE studies and assigned HCPCS code C9782 to APC 1574 (New Technology-- Level 37 ($9,501-$10,000)) with the status indicator “T.” We subsequently revised the descriptor for HCPCS code C9782 to: (Blinded procedure for New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II or III heart failure, or Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Class III or IV chronic refractory angina; transcatheter intramyocardial transplantation of autologous bone marrow cells (e.g., mononuclear) or placebo control, autologous bone marrow harvesting and preparation for transplantation, left heart catheterization including ventriculography, all laboratory services, and all imaging with or without guidance (e.g., transthoracic echocardiography, ultrasound, fluoroscopy), all device(s), performed in an approved Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) study) to clarify the inclusion of the Helix trans endocardial injection catheter device in the descriptor. Additionally, we determined that APC 1590 (New Technology--Level 39 ($15,001-$20,000)) most accurately accounted for the resources associated with furnishing the procedure described by HCPCS code C9782.
\18\ ClinicalTrials.gov. “Randomized Controlled Pivotal Trial of Autologous Bone Marrow Cells Using the CardiAMP Cell Therapy System in Patients With Refractory Angina Pectoris and Chronic Myocardial Ischemia.” Accessed May 10, 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03455725?term=NCT03455725&rank=1.
\19\ ClinicalTrials.gov. “Randomized Controlled Pivotal Trial of Autologous Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells Using the CardiAMP Cell Therapy System in Patients With Post Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure.” Accessed May 10, 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02438306.
For CY 2025, the OPPS payment rates were based on available CY 2023 claims data. We identified three single frequency paid claims for C9782 for ratesetting for CY 2025. Because we finalized our proposal to maintain current New Technology APC assignments for CY 2025 for New Technology APC services with fewer than 10 claims in the 4-year lookback period, we continued to assign HCPCS code C9782 to APC 1590 with a payment rate of $17,500.50 for CY 2025.
For CY 2026, there were no new claims reported for HCPCS code C9782. Therefore, there are still only three single frequency claims available for HCPCS code C9782 in the 4-year lookback period. Given our proposal to maintain current New Technology APC assignments for CY 2026 for New Technology APC services with fewer than 10 claims in the 4-year lookback period applicable for the universal low-volume APC policy moving forward, we proposed to continue to assign HCPCS code C9782 to APC 1590 (New Technology--Level 39 ($15,001-$20,000)) with a payment rate of $17,500.50.
We did not receive public comments on this provision, and our updated claims data did not show any additional claims for HCPCS Code C9782. Therefore, we are finalizing our proposal to continue to assign HCPCS code C9782 to New Technology APC 1590 with a status indication of “T” for CY 2026. Refer to Table 22 for the final OPPS New Technology APC and status indicator assignment for HCPCS code C9782. The final CY 2026 payment rates can be found in Addendum B to this final rule with comment via the internet on the CMS website. [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.040
g. Atherosclerosis Imaging-Quantitative Computer Tomography (AI-QCT) (APC 1511)
Atherosclerosis Imaging-Quantitative Computer Tomography (AI-QCT) is a Software as a Service (SaaS) that assesses the extent of coronary artery disease severity. This procedure is performed to quantify the extent of coronary plaque and stenosis in patients who have undergone coronary computed tomography analysis (CCTA). The AMA CPT Editorial Panel established the following four codes associated with this service, effective January 1, 2021:
0623T: Automated quantification and characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaque to assess severity of coronary disease, using data from coronary computed tomographic angiography; data preparation and transmission, computerized analysis of data, with review of computerized analysis output to reconcile discordant data, interpretation and report.
0624T: Automated quantification and characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaque to assess severity of coronary disease, using data from coronary computed tomographic angiography; data preparation and transmission.
0625T: Automated quantification and characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaque to assess severity of coronary disease, using data from coronary computed tomographic angiography; computerized analysis of
data from coronary computed tomographic angiography.
0626T: Automated quantification and characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaque to assess severity of coronary disease, using data from coronary computed tomographic angiography; review of computerized analysis output to reconcile discordant data, interpretation and report.
Of these four CPT codes, only CPT code 0625T was determined to be separately payable in the OPPS and was assigned to status indicator = “S” (Procedure or Service, Not Discounted When Multiple) starting October 1, 2022. We assigned CPT code 0625T to a separately payable status indicator based on the technology and its potential utilization in the HOPD setting, our evaluation of the service, as well as input from our medical advisors. The procedure was assigned to APC 1511 (New Technology--Level 11 ($900-$1000)) with a payment rate of $950.50.
For CY 2024, the OPPS payment rates were based on available CY 2022 claims data. There were 37 claims for CPT code 0625T during this time period. As this was below the threshold of 100 claims for a service within a year, we explained that we could propose to designate CPT code 0625T as a low volume service under our universal low volume New Technology APC policy and use the highest of the geometric mean cost, arithmetic mean cost, or median cost based on up to 4 years of claims data to assign code 0625T to the appropriate New Technology APC. We found the geometric mean cost for the service to be approximately $3.70, the arithmetic mean cost to be approximately $4.10, and the median cost to be approximately $3.50. Under our universal low volume New Technology APC policy, we would use the greatest of the statistical methodologies, the arithmetic mean, to assign CPT code 0625T to New Technology 1491 (New Technology Level 1A--(0-$10)) with a payment rate of $5.00. However, we acknowledged that, because CPT code 0625T was only made separately payable as part of the OPPS in October 2022, and, therefore, the CY 2022 claims available only reflected two months of data, we were concerned that we did not have sufficient claims data to justify reassignment to another New Technology APC (66 FR 69902). Therefore, consistent with our current policy to retain services within New Technology APC groups until we obtain sufficient claims data to justify reassignment (66 FR 59902), for CY 2024, we finalized our proposal to maintain CPT code 0625T's assignment to APC 1511 (New Technology--Level 11 ($901-$1000) with a payment rate of $950.50 rather than applying the universal low volume APC policy. For 2025, there were only 3 available claims for 0625T. We continued to have concerns that we did not have sufficient claims data to justify reassignment to another New Technology APC based on the CY 2023 geometric mean cost of $180. Therefore, we used our authority under section 1833(t)(2)(E) for CY 2025 to continue to assign CPT code 0625T to APC 1511 (New Technology--Level 11 ($901-$1000) with a payment rate of $950.50.
Effective January 1, 2026, the AMA CPT Editorial Panel is creating a new Category I CPT code for AI-QCT, which is currently described by CPT code 75577 (placeholder code 75XX6) (Quantification and characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaque to assess severity of coronary disease, derived from augmentative software analysis of the data set from a coronary computed tomographic angiography, with interpretation and report by a physician or other qualified healthcare professional). CPT codes 0623T-0626T are being deleted and replaced with CPT code 75577 (placeholder code 75XX6). Since CPT placeholder code 75XX6 will not be effective until January 1, 2026, we will not have claims data available for ratesetting for this code until the CY 2028 rulemaking cycle. However, as CPT code 0625T will still be in use until December 31, 2025, we proposed to determine the payment rate for CPT placeholder code 75XX6 using the available CY 2024 claims data for CPT code 0625T.
For the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, there were 22 separately payable claims in the CY 2024 data reported for CPT code 0625T with a geometric mean cost of approximately $496. Given that there were fewer than 100 claims, CPT code 0625T would fall under our universal low volume New Technology APC policy where we would use the highest of the geometric mean cost, arithmetic mean cost, or median cost based on up to 4 years of claims data to assign CPT code 0625T to the appropriate New Technology APC. Using a 4-year lookback of claims data, we determined the geometric mean cost to be $13.21, the arithmetic mean cost to be $243, and the median cost to be $3.51. However, this lookback includes the claims from CY 2021 and CY 2022 that indicate that the cost of the procedure is less than $5, which would not appear to cover the basic costs of this procedure including computing time, generating a report, and having medical personnel interpret the report. The claims were also significantly lower than the expected cost of this procedure based on evidence submitted by the manufacturer when this technology was initially evaluated for placement in a New Technology APC. For CY 2024, the geometric mean cost of around $496 based on 22 claims may better reflect the cost of the procedure described by CPT code 0625T, but there are not enough claims to be confident about the result. Due to these issues, we are not confident that the results of the 4-year lookback period accurately reflect the actual costs of CPT code 0625T. Additionally, we recognize that software-based technologies are unique and rapidly evolving and that a significant fluctuation in payment may hinder patient access to these new services. We issued a comment solicitation in section III.F. of the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule to collect information on alternative and consistent payment methods that seek to reflect the underlying value of SaaS under the OPPS to consider in future rulemaking. We hope to identify whether specific adjustments to our payment policies for SaaS are needed to more accurately and appropriately pay for these products and services across settings of care. Therefore, we proposed to use our authority under section 1833(t)(2)(E) to assign CPT code 75577 (placeholder code 75XX6) to APC 1511 (New Technology--Level 11 ($901-$1000) with a payment rate of $950.50 for CY 2026, which based on the information currently available to us, best reflects the cost of the service as described by the New Technology APC application.
We received public comments on this proposal. The following is a summary of the comments we received and our responses.
Comment: Several commenters supported the assignment of CPT code 75577 (placeholder code 75XX6) to APC 1511 (New Technology--Level 11 ($901-$1000) for CY 2025.
Response: We note that since the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule was issued, nine additional claims for CPT code 0625T have been processed, with the updated geometric mean cost decreasing to approximately $375. Although we have nine additional claims, we are not certain that we have enough claims data to be confident in the calculated geometric mean cost for CPT code 0625T. Therefore, we are finalizing our proposal, without modification, to assign CPT code 75577 to APC 1511 (New Technology--Level 11 ($901-$1000).
Comment: Multiple commenters requested that CMS proactively ensures
that Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) do not issue an edit that restricts certain revenue codes for CPT code 75577 (placeholder code 75XX6), as had previously been issued for CPT code 75580.
Response: We are able to confirm that there are no MAC edits in place for CPT code 75577. Facilities may bill CPT 75577 with any appropriate revenue code. As a reminder, it is longstanding CMS policy that hospital outpatient facilities are responsible for reporting the appropriate cost centers and revenue codes on claims. As stated in section 20.5 in Chapter 4 (Part B Hospital) of the Medicare Claims Processing Manual, CMS “does not instruct hospitals on the assignment of HCPCS codes to revenue codes for services provided under OPPS since hospitals' assignment of cost vary. Where explicit instructions are not provided, HOPDs should report their charges under the revenue code that will result in the charges being assigned to the same cost center to which the cost of those services are assigned in the cost report.”
After consideration of the public comments we received, we are finalizing our proposal without modification. Refer to Table 23 for the final OPPS New Technology APC and status indicator assignment for HCPCS codes 0625T and 75577 for CY 2026. The final CY 2026 payment rates can be found in Addendum B to this final rule with comment period via the internet on the CMS website. In addition, we refer readers to Addendum D1 to this final rule with comment period for the status indicator meanings for all codes reported under the OPPS. Addendum D1 can also be found via the internet on the CMS website. [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.041
h. Corvia Medical Interatrial Shunt Procedure (APC 1592)
On July 1, 2020, we established HCPCS code C9760 (Non-randomized, non-blinded procedure for nyha class ii, iii, iv heart failure; transcatheter implantation of interatrial shunt or placebo control, including right and left heart catheterization, transeptal puncture, trans-esophageal echocardiography (tee)/intracardiac echocardiography (ice), and all imaging with or without guidance (for example, ultrasound, fluoroscopy), performed in an approved investigational device exemption (ide) study) to facilitate payment for the implantation of the Corvia Medical interatrial shunt.
As we stated in the CY 2021 OPPS final rule with comment period (85 FR 85947), we believe that similar resources and device costs are involved with the Corvia Medical interatrial shunt procedure and the V- Wave interatrial shunt procedure. Unlike the V-Wave interatrial shunt, which is implanted half the time the associated interatrial shunt procedure described by HCPCS code C9758 is billed, the Corvia Medical interatrial shunt is implanted every time the associated interatrial shunt procedure (HCPCS code C9760) is billed. Therefore, for CY 2021, we assigned HCPCS code C9760 to APC 1592 (New Technology--Level 41 ($25,001-$30,000)) with a payment rate of $27,500.50. We also modified the code descriptor for HCPCS code C9760 to remove the phrase “or placebo control,” from the descriptor.
For CY 2025, the OPPS payment rates were based on available CY 2023 claims data. There were two claims for HCPCS code C9760 in CY 2023. We continued to assign HCPCS code C9760 to APC 1592 (New Technology--Level 41 ($25,001- $30,000)) based on our CY 2025 policy to maintain current New Technology APC assignments for CY 2025 for New Technology APC services with fewer than 10 claims in the 4-year lookback period applicable for the universal low-volume APC policy.
For CY 2026, the OPPS payment rates were proposed to be based on available CY 2024 claims data. There were no claims for HCPSC code C9760 in CY 2024. Therefore, for CY 2026, given our proposal to maintain current New Technology APC assignments for CY 2026 for New Technology APC services with fewer than 10 claims in the 4-year lookback period applicable for the universal low-volume APC policy moving forward, we proposed to continue to assign HCPCS code C9760
to APC 1592 (New Technology--Level 41 ($25,001- $30,000)) with a payment rate of $27,500.50.
We received public comments on this proposal. The following is a summary of the comments we received and our responses.
Comment: A commenter supported CMS' proposal and stated that it would preserve access.
Response: We thank the commenter for their support.
We note that there were no additional claims for HCPCS code C9760 in our updated claims data. Therefore, for CY 2026, we are finalizing our proposal without modification. Specifically for CY 2026, we are assigning HCPCS code C9760 to APC 1592 (New Technology--Level 41 ($25,001-$30,000)) with a payment rate of $27,500.50.
Refer to Table 24 for the final OPPS New Technology APC and status indicator assignments for HCPCS code C9760 for CY 2026. The CY 2026 payment rates can be found in Addendum B to this final rule via the internet on the CMS website. In addition, we refer readers to Addendum D1 to this final rule with comment period for the status indicator meanings for all codes reported under the OPPS. Addendum D1 can also be found via the internet on the CMS website. [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.042
i. DARI Motion Procedure (APC 1505)
Effective January 1, 2022, CPT code 0693T (Comprehensive full body computer-based markerless 3D kinematic and kinetic motion analysis and report) is associated with the DARI Motion Procedure, a service that provides human motion analysis to aid clinicians in pre- and post- operative surgical intervention and in making other treatment decisions, including selecting the best course of physical therapy and rehabilitation. The technology consists of eight cameras that surround a patient, which send live video to a computer workstation that analyzes the video to create a 3D reconstruction of the patient without the need for special clothing, markers, or devices attached to the patient's clothing or skin.
Since CPT code 0693T became effective January 1, 2022, we have had no claims for the DARI Motion Procedure and, therefore, have maintained its initial APC assignment to APC 1505 (New Technology--Level 5 ($301- $400)) with a payment of $350.50.
For CY 2026, the OPPS payment rates were proposed based on available CY 2024 claims data. Because we did not have any available claims data, we proposed to continue to assign CPT code 0693T to APC 1505 (New Technology--Level 5 ($301-400)), with a payment rate of $350.50, for CY 2026.
CMS did not receive any public comments on our proposal, and there continue to be no claims for this service. Therefore, for CY 2026, we are finalizing our proposal without modification to continue to assign CPT Code 0693T to New Technology APC 1505 (New Technology--Level 5 ($301-$400)) with a status indicator of “S” for CY 2026, found in Table 25. The CY 2026 payment rates can be found in Addendum B to this final rule with comment period via the internet on the CMS website. [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.043
j. Instillation of Anti-Neoplastic Pharmacologic/Biologic Agent Into Renal Pelvis (APC 1551)
Effective October 1, 2023, CMS established HCPCS code C9789 (Instillation of anti-neoplastic pharmacologic/biologic agent into renal pelvis, any method, including all imaging guidance, including volumetric measurement if performed) and assigned it to APC 1559 (New Technology--Level 22 ($2001-$2500)), with a payment rate of $2,250.50 based on our review of the clinical and resource characteristics of this service.
This code may be used to describe the unique procedure associated with the administration of the drug described by HCPCS code J9281 (Mitomycin pyelocalyceal instillation, 1 mg) or similar products. HCPCS code J9281 may be used to describe the product, JELMYTO[supreg] (mitomycin for pyelocalyceal solution). The FDA approved JELYMTO[supreg] in 2020, and the FDA approved indication and usage for JELMYTO[supreg] is as an alkylating drug indicated for the treatment of adult patients with low-grade Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer (LG- UTUS).\20\
\20\ Jelymyto Package Insert, Revised: 01/2021. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/211728s002lbl.pdf.
For CY 2025, the OPPS payment rates were based on available CY 2023 claims data. Because we created HCPCS code C9789 effective October 1, 2023, we had limited claims data from CY 2023 available for CY 2025 rulemaking. Specifically, we only had 6 claims available for ratesetting, so we maintained the New Technology APC assignment of APC 1559 (New Technology--Level 22 ($2001-$2500)) with a payment of $2,250.50 for CY 2025, based on our CY 2025 policy to maintain the New Technology APC assignment for New Technology APC services with fewer than 10 claims in the 4-year lookback period applicable for the universal low-volume APC policy.
For CY 2026, the OPPS payment rates were proposed based on available CY 2024 claims data. HCPCS code C9789 had 109 single frequency claims in CY 2024, which exceeds the 100 claims threshold generally used for the universal low volume APC policy. The geometric mean cost for HCPCS code C9789 is approximately $1,401. Therefore, for CY 2026, we proposed to assign HCPCS code C9789 to APC 1553 (New Technology--Level 16 ($1401-$1500)) with a payment rate of $1,450.50.
We received public comments on this proposal. The following is a summary of the comments we received and our responses.
Comment: A commenter supported HCPCS code C7989 remaining in a New Technology APC but requested that HCPCS C7989 remain assigned to New Technology APC 1559 (New Technology--Level 22 ($2001-$2500)). The commenter stated they do not believe providers are consistently reporting HCPCS code C9789 when JELMYTO[supreg] is administered and are using alternative CPT codes for the procedure. As a result, the commenter believes the 2024 claims do not adequately reflect the costs for administering JELMYTO[supreg]. The commenter expressed concerns about beneficiaries having future access to the instillation procedure for JELMYTO[supreg] if the procedure was no longer assigned to a New Technology APC and requested that CMS issue a MLN Matters[supreg] or similar guidance to provide information on how to code and bill the instillation procedure with the drug JELMYTO[supreg].
Response: Providing coding guidance is out of scope for the OPPS/ ASC final rule with comment period. We note that if hospitals have questions about appropriate coding that they cannot resolve on their own, the initial first step would be to review the HCPCS code descriptors or consult the appropriate Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) for their jurisdiction. We note that HCPCS code J9281 is assigned to a status indicator of `K' (Nonpass-Through Drugs and Nonimplantable Biologicals, Including Therapeutic Radiopharmaceuticals; Paid under OPPS; separate APC payment.) and procedures and services assigned to a New Technology APC are excluded from the C-APC packaging policy. (See the Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 4, Section 10.2.3 for a list of exclusions to the comprehensive APC packaging policy.) Therefore, providers may receive separate payment for both the drug and installation procedure when providing this service.
In response to maintaining the CY 2025 New Technology APC assignment, we note that HCPCS code C9789 has over 100 claims, and therefore, the New Technology APC assignment is based on the geometric mean cost for that code. We note that the geometric mean cost and claims data for HCPCS code C9789 has changed since the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule. Based on the updated claims data for this final rule with comment period, the geometric mean cost for HCPCS code C9789 is $1,211 based on 222 single frequency claims. We believe that 222 single frequency claims is adequate for ratesetting for this service. As we do every year, we will reevaluate the APC assignments for these codes in the next rulemaking cycle. We remind hospitals that we review, on an annual basis, the APC assignments for all items and services paid under the OPPS.
In summary, after consideration of the public comment we received, we are finalizing with modification a New Technology APC assignment for HCPCS code C9789 to APC 1551 (New Technology--Level 14 ($1201-$1300)) with a payment rate of $1,250.50.
Refer to Table 26 for the final OPPS New Technology APC and status indicator assignments for CPT code C9789 for CY 2026. The final CY 2026 payment rates for this code can be found in Addendum B to this final rule with comment period. In addition, we refer readers to Addendum D1 to this final rule with comment period for the SI definitions for all codes reported under the OPPS. Addenda B and D1 are available via the internet on the CMS website.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.044
k. LimFlow TADV Procedure CPT Code 0620T (APC 1580)
The LimFlow TADV procedure which is described by CPT code 0620T (Endovascular venous arterialization, tibial or peroneal vein, with transcatheter placement of intravascular stent graft(s) and closure by any method, including percutaneous or open vascular access, ultrasound guidance for vascular access when performed, all catheterization(s) and intraprocedural roadmapping and imaging guidance necessary to complete the intervention, all associated radiological supervision and interpretation, when performed) is an endovascular procedure that is used to treat patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. According to the developer, these patients are no longer eligible for conventional endovascular or open bypass surgery to treat their artery blockage, and without this procedure, they are likely to face limb amputation.
CPT code 0620T was established in January 2021 and was assigned to APC 5194 (Level 4 Endovascular Procedures) with a payment rate of approximately $17,400, which is the highest-paying APC for endovascular procedures. While we proposed to continue to assign CPT code 0620T to APC 5194 for CY 2024, we finalized a reassignment from a clinical APC to a New Technology APC with a higher payment rate based on comments received expressing concern that the low payment rate of the procedure would discourage providers from performing the procedure and deny access to the procedure. For CY 2024, the procedure was assigned to APC 1578 (New Technology--Level 41 ($25,001-$30,000)). For CY 2025 ratesetting, there were 11 single frequency claims for CPT code 0620T in the CY 2023 claims data. As this is below the threshold of 100 claims for a service within a year, we applied our universal low volume APC policy and used the highest of the geometric mean cost, arithmetic mean cost, or median cost based on up to 4 years of claims data to assign the service to the appropriate New Technology APC. Based on our review of the available claims and the application of the universal low volume APC policy, we assigned HCPCS code 0620T to APC 1579 (New Technology--Level 42 ($30,001-$40,000)) with a payment rate of $35,000.50 based on the median cost of approximately $36,400.
For CY 2026, the OPPS payment rates were proposed to be based on available CY 2024 claims data. There were 19 single frequency claims for 0620T in the CY 2024 claims data. As this is below the threshold of 100 claims for a service within a year, we proposed to again apply our universal low volume APC policy and use the highest of the geometric mean cost, arithmetic mean cost, or median cost based on up to 4 years of claims data to assign the service to the appropriate New Technology APC. Based on our review of the available claims, we have determined that the arithmetic mean is approximately $39,000; the median is approximately $38,000; and the geometric mean cost is approximately $35,000. Of these, the arithmetic mean is the statistical methodology that estimated the highest cost for the service. The payment rate calculated using this methodology falls within the cost band for APC 1579 (New Technology--Level 42 ($30,001-$40,000)) with a payment rate of $35,000.50. Therefore, for CY 2026, we proposed to designate this service as a low volume service under our universal low volume APC policy and to continue to assign HCPCS code 0620T to APC 1579 (New Technology--Level 42 ($30,001-$40,000)) with a payment rate of $35,000.50.
We received public comments on these proposals. The following is a summary of the comments we received and our responses.
Comment: A commenter supported the proposal to assign CPT code 0620T to APC 1579 (New Technology--Level 42 ($30,001-$40,000)) with a payment rate of $35,000.50 for CY 2026 based on the application of the universal low volume APC policy. The commenter stated that the assignment accurately reflects the resources used in the procedure.
Response: Based on the public comments received, we are finalizing our proposal to apply our universal low volume APC policy and use the highest of the geometric mean cost, arithmetic mean cost, or median cost based on up to 4 years of claims data to assign the service to the appropriate New Technology APC. Three additional claims for CY 2024 have been processed since the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule. Our analysis of the updated claims data found that the greater of the geometric mean, arithmetic mean, or median cost calculated for CPT code 0620T is $43,748.64 based on the arithmetic mean. This value falls within APC 1580 (New Technology--Level 43 ($40,001-$50,000)) with a payment rate of $45,000.50. Therefore, for CY 2026, we are assigning CPT code 0620T to APC 1580 based on the application of the universal low volume APC policy. Refer to Table 27 for the final OPPS New Technology APC and status indicator assignments for CPT code 0620T for CY 2026. The final CY 2026 payment rates can be found in Addendum B to this final rule with comment period via the internet on the CMS website.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.045
l. Liver Histotripsy Service (APC 1579)
CPT code 0686T (Histotripsy (i.e., non-thermal ablation via acoustic energy delivery) of malignant hepatocellular tissue, including image guidance) was first effective July 1, 2021, and describes the histotripsy service associated with the use of the HistoSonics system. Histotripsy is a non-invasive, non-thermal, mechanical process that uses a focused beam of sonic energy to destroy cancerous liver tumors and is currently in a non-randomized, prospective clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the device for the treatment of primary or metastatic tumors located in the liver.\21\ When HCPCS code 0686T was first effective, the histotripsy procedure was designated as a Category A IDE clinical study (NCT04573881). Since devices in Category A IDE studies are excluded from Medicare payment, payment for CPT code 0686T only reflected the cost of the service that is performed (absent the cost of the device) each time it is reported on a claim. On March 2, 2023, the histotripsy IDE clinical study was re-designated as a Category B (Non-experimental/Investigational) IDE study. Due to this new designation, payment for CPT code 0686T in CY 2024 reflected payment for both the service that was performed and the device used each time it was reported on a claim. For CY 2024, we assigned CPT code 0686T to APC 1576 (New Technology--Level 39 ($15,001-$20,000)) with a payment rate of $17,500.50. For CY 2025, we continued to assign CPT code 0686T to APC 1576 (New Technology--Level 39 ($15,001-$20,000) due to our CY 2025 policy to maintain current New Technology APC assignments for CY 2025 for New Technology APC services with fewer than 10 claims in the 4-year lookback period applicable for the universal low volume APC policy, and based on the fact that there were only 3 claims for CPT code 0686T in the prior 4-year period.
\21\ ClinicalTrials.gov. “The HistoSonics System for Treatment of Primary and Metastatic Liver Tumors Using Histotripsy (#HOPE4LIVER) (#HOPE4LIVER).” Accessed May 10, 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04573881.
For CY 2026, the OPPS payment rates were proposed to be based on available CY 2024 claims data. For the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, we identified 94 claims for CPT code 0686T within this period. As this is below the threshold of 100 claims for a service within a year, we propose to apply our universal low volume APC policy and use the highest of the geometric mean cost, arithmetic mean cost, or median cost based on up to 4 years of claims data to assign CPT code 0686T to the appropriate New Technology APC. We identified $32,307.41 as the arithmetic mean, $20,577.77 as the median, and $21,264.91 as the geometric mean. The arithmetic mean was the statistical methodology that estimated the highest cost for CPT code 0686T. For CY 2026, we proposed to reassign CPT code 0686T to APC 1579 (New Technology--Level 42 ($30,001-$40,000)) with a payment rate of $35,000.50.
We received public comments on this proposal. The following is a summary of the comments we received and our responses.
Comment: A commenter supported the proposal to reassign CPT code 0686T to APC 1579 (New Technology--Level 42 ($30,001-$40,000)) for CY 2026 based on the 94 claims data available.
Response: We thank the commenter for their input.
Six additional claims for CY 2024 have been processed since the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, bringing the total number of claims to 100. Since the total number of CY 2024 single frequency claims for CY code 0686T surpasses the 99 claim threshold for the universal low volume APC policy, we would use the geometric mean cost of the CY 2024 claims data to set the payment rate for CY 2026 under our standard ratesetting methodology, rather than the highest of the three statistical methodologies over a 4-year lookback period. Based on the updated claims data available for this final rule with comment period, the geometric mean cost for HCPCS code 0686T is around $16,008. Due to the updated claims data available for this final rule with comment period, we are finalizing a New Technology APC assignment for HCPCS code 0686T to APC 1576 (New Technology--Level 39 ($15,001-$20,000)) with a payment rate of around $17,500.50. This is the same APC to which the service is currently assigned in CY 2025.
Refer to Table 28 for the final OPPS New Technology APC and status indicator assignments for CPT code 0686T for CY 2026. We refer readers to Addendum B to this final rule with comment period for the final CY 2026 OPPS payment rate for this code.
Addendum B is available via the internet on the CMS website. [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.046
m. LiverMultiScan Service (APC 1511)
CPT codes 0648T (Quantitative magnetic resonance for analysis of tissue composition (e.g., fat, iron, water content), including multiparametric data acquisition, data preparation and transmission, interpretation and report, obtained without diagnostic mri examination of the same anatomy (e.g., organ, gland, tissue, target structure) during the same session; single organ) and 0649T (Quantitative magnetic resonance for analysis of tissue composition (e.g., fat, iron, water content), including multiparametric data acquisition, data preparation and transmission, interpretation and report, obtained with diagnostic mri examination of the same anatomy (e.g., organ, gland, tissue, target structure); single organ (list separately in addition to code for primary procedure)) became effective July 1, 2021 and are associated with the LiverMultiScan service.
LiverMultiScan is a Software as a medical Service (SaaS) that is intended to aid the diagnosis and management of chronic liver disease, the most prevalent of which is Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). It provides standardized, quantitative imaging biomarkers for the characterization and assessment of inflammation, hepatocyte ballooning, and fibrosis, as well as steatosis, and iron accumulation. LiverMultiScan receives MR images acquired from patients' providers and analyzes the images using their proprietary Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms. It then sends the providers a quantitative metric report of the patient's liver fibrosis and inflammation. In accordance with our SaaS add-on codes policy (87 FR 72032 to 72033), SaaS CPT add- on codes are assigned to the same APCs and status indicators as their standalone codes. Thus, CPT code 0649T, the add-on code for LiverMultiScan, is assigned to the identical APC and status indicator as CPT code 0648T, the standalone code for the same service.
For CY 2024 and CY 2025, we used our equitable adjustment authority under section 1833(t)(2)(E) to continue to assign CPT codes 0648T and 0649T to APC 1511 (New Technology--Level 11 ($901-$1,000) with a payment rate of $950.50.
For CY 2026, the OPPS payment rates were proposed based on available CY 2024 claims data. We identified 107 single frequency claims for CPT code 0648T and 104 single frequency claims CPT code 0649T for CY 2024. The geometric mean cost for CPT code 0648T was $253.68 and the geometric mean cost for CPT code 0649T was $162.96. Based on the geometric mean cost for CPT code 0648T, we would have assigned CPT codes 0648T and 0649T to APC 1504 (New Technology--Level 4 ($201-$300)) with a payment rate of $250.50. However, assigning these SaaS technologies based on the geometric costs would have decreased the payment rate by around 75 percent. We recognized that software-based technologies, like those described by CPT codes 0648T and 0649T, continue to evolve and that the limited claims data may not have truly represented the cost of this service. We issued a comment solicitation in section III.F. of the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule to collect information on alternative and consistent payment methods that seek to reflect the underlying value of SaaS technologies under the OPPS to consider in future rulemaking. We hoped to identify whether specific adjustments to our payment policies for SaaS technologies are needed to more accurately and appropriately pay for these products and services across settings of care. Therefore, we proposed to use our authority under section 1833(t)(2)(E) of Act for CY 2026 to continue to assign CPT codes 0648T and 0649T to APC 1511 (New Technology--Level 11 ($901- $1000)) with a payment rate of $950.50, which we believed best reflected the cost of the service, based on information provided by the applicant.
We note that since the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC proposed rule was published, CPT code 0648T has an updated geometric mean cost of around $269 based on 114 single frequency claims, and CPT code 0649T has an updated geometric mean cost of around $158 based on 111 single frequency claims.
We received public comments on this proposal. The following is a summary of the comments we received and our responses.
Comment: A number of comments were received in support of maintaining the APC assignments to New Technology APC 1511. Commenters stated that maintaining the current payment rate for LiverMultiScan will allow continued access to this valuable non-invasive imaging tool service. Many commenters noted the clinical relevance of these procedures in obtaining information on a patient's liver health and developing appropriate treatment plans.
A commenter supported the proposed New Technology APC assignment but also provided possible explanations for the payment variability, including the inappropriate use of CPT codes and distorted data due to inappropriate cost to charge ratios. The commenter noted the need for reliable claims data for ratesetting.
Response: We appreciate the commenters' input and support for the proposed APC assignment. We hope to glean valuable information from the SaaS comment solicitation that will help us understand the potential factors that affect payment consistency. We hope by having this additional information, we can put forth a policy in future rulemaking that provides a
more stable payment method for SaaS technologies.
After consideration of the public comment we received, we are finalizing our proposal without modification. We will use our equitable adjustment authority under section 1833(t)(2)(E) of the Act to continue to assign CPT codes 0648T and 0649T to New Technology APC 1511 (New Technology--Level 11 ($901-$1,000) with a payment rate of $950.50 for CY 2026.
Refer to Table 29 for the OPPS New Technology APC and status indicator assignments for CPT codes 0648T and 0649T for CY 2026. The final CY 2026 payment rates can be found in Addendum B to this final rule via the internet on the CMS website. In addition, we refer readers to Addendum D1 to this final rule with comment period for the status indicator meanings for all codes reported under the OPPS. Addendum D1 can also be found via the internet on the CMS website. [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25NO25.047
← B. Final Conversion Factor Update to III. OPPS Ambulatory Payment Classification (APC) Group PoliciesContentsn. Optellum Lung Cancer Prediction (LCP) (APC 1508) to 17. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) Procedure, HCPCS Code C9779 (APC 5303) →
- The rule itself
Health and Human Services Department, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of the Secretary, “Medicare Program: Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Systems; Quality Reporting Programs; Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating; Hospital Price Transparency; and Notice of Closure of a Teaching Hospital and Opportunity To Apply for Available Slots,” 90 FR 53448 (November 25, 2025). Effective January 1, 2026.
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/11/25/2025-20907/medicare-program-hospital-outpatient-prospective-payment-and-ambulatory-surgical-center-payment - This page
“Medicare Program: Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Systems; Quality Reporting Programs; Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating; Hospital Price Transparency; and Notice of Closure of a Teaching Hospital and Opportunity To Apply for Available Slots,” the text from “A. OPPS Treatment of New and Revised HCPCS Codes” to “m. LiverMultiScan Service (APC 1511).” Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/rules/rule-2025-20907/text-4/ (retrieved August 27, 2026).
Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.
How This Rule Is Set Out
Federal Register documents are United States government works and are not under copyright, so the rule is here whole rather than cut to an excerpt. It is split at the headings the Register itself prints: the line it is filed under, the captioned fields on its face, the preamble where the agency says what it is doing and why, and the amendments to the Code of Federal Regulations. No passage is shortened.
Two things the Register prints are not reproduced: the running head it repeats at every page break, and the tables it sets as pictures rather than as words. Its own marker for one of those tables, [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED], is left standing where the table was, so a reader can see that something is there and follow the link to the page it is on.
Every heading in the rule is listed on the rule's own page, which says which of these pages each one is on. A heading with nothing quoted under it is one the rule prints on its own, with the words that follow it set under the headings beneath.