Proposals are measured against established standards
What the document says“reasonable and well-established technical, financial, and operational standards, including the technical standards adopted by the Commission in orders of the Commission relating to Establishing the Digital Opportunity Data Collection (WC Docket No. 19-195) (or orders of the Commission relating to modernizing any successor collection) for purposes of entities that must report broadband availability coverage”
The first of two things the Commission is to evaluate a proposal against. The section directs that the Commission shall evaluate a proposal described in subparagraph (B) against reasonable and well-established standards of these three kinds, and names one source of them: the technical standards the Commission adopted in its orders in WC Docket No. 19-195, Establishing the Digital Opportunity Data Collection, or orders on any successor collection, as those standards apply to entities that must report broadband availability coverage. Those orders are not indexed here.
What the document actually says“reasonable and well-established technical, financial, and operational standards, including the technical standards adopted by the Commission in orders of the Commission relating to Establishing the Digital Opportunity Data Collection (WC Docket No. 19-195) (or orders of the Commission relating to modernizing any successor collection) for purposes of entities that must report broadband availability coverage”
The FCC must judge a plan against known standards. They cover skill, money, and how well a firm can run a network. Some come from its own past rules.
The FCC has written standards like these before. It has to use those. It does not make up a fresh test for each person who asks.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.