Activity already authorized in a corridor is not precluded
What the document says“shall not preclude-- (A) any activity authorized in accordance with a designated corridor or right-of-way referred to in paragraph (1), including the operation, maintenance, repair, or replacement of any authorized utility facility within the corridor or right-of-way”
Section 3(c)(2)(A) of the Act. The boundary expansion does not preclude activity authorized in accordance with a corridor or right-of-way described in paragraph (1), including operating, maintaining, repairing or replacing an authorized utility facility within it.
What the document actually says“shall not preclude-- (A) any activity authorized in accordance with a designated corridor or right-of-way referred to in paragraph (1), including the operation, maintenance, repair, or replacement of any authorized utility facility within the corridor or right-of-way”
Work that was already allowed can go on. That takes in running, fixing and swapping out power gear.
Power lines and towers are utility gear. This part says the bigger boundary does not stop work on them.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.