A classified source or the agency's own finding are two further grounds for denial
What the document says“has a security risk with a primary source that is classified; or ``(F) has a security risk that the Federal agency determines warrants a denial;”
The same two amendments add subparagraphs (E) and (F) alongside the list-based ground. Subparagraph (E) reaches a security risk whose primary source is classified. Subparagraph (F) reaches a security risk that the Federal agency determines warrants a denial. Both wordings are written into subsection (g) and into subsection (o).
What the document actually says“has a security risk with a primary source that is classified; or ``(F) has a security risk that the Federal agency determines warrants a denial;”
A firm can be turned down for a risk that is a secret. It can also be turned down if the agency decides the risk is bad enough.
Some proof is kept secret. The law lets the agency act on it anyway. The last ground has no set test. The agency makes the call.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.