Read theMandate

Small Business Innovation and Economic Security ActSection 2 › Proposal

A tie to an entity on one of eight named lists is a ground for denial

To extend the SBIR and STTR programs, and for other purposes, section 2, Sec. 2. Written by .

A tie to an entity on one of eight named lists is a ground for denial

The document says “is amendedWho acts: Federal agencies running SBIR or STTR programsHow: statuteSec. 2 in the PDF
What the document says

“has a security risk connecting the small business concern to an entity, including any affiliates of the entity, or individual on-- ``(i) the UFLPA Entity List maintained by the Department of Homeland Security;”

To extend the SBIR and STTR programs, and for other purposes, Sec. 2

Subsection (a)(1)(C)(vi) adds a new subparagraph (D) to the paragraph of subsection (g) that lists grounds for denial, and subsection (a)(2)(C)(vi) adds a matching subparagraph to subsection (o). The new ground reaches a connection to an entity, including any of its affiliates, or to an individual on any of eight lists: the UFLPA Entity List kept by the Department of Homeland Security, the Non-SDN Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Companies List kept by the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control, the Section 889 Prohibition List established under section 889 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115-232) and kept by the Defense Department, the list of Chinese Military companies required under section 1260H of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (10 U.S.C. 113 note) and kept by the Defense Department, the Military End User List and the Entity List kept by the Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security, the List of Equipment and Services kept by the Federal Communications Commission, and the Withhold Release Orders and Findings List kept by U.S. Customs and Border Protection. The version written into subsection (o) opens with the words 'has a foreign risk' where the version written into subsection (g) says 'has a security risk'.

What the document actually says

“has a security risk connecting the small business concern to an entity, including any affiliates of the entity, or individual on-- ``(i) the UFLPA Entity List maintained by the Department of Homeland Security;”

To extend the SBIR and STTR programs, and for other purposes, Sec. 2
That sentence, in plain words

A firm can be turned down if it is tied to a listed group. The tie can be to the group or to a branch of it. The tie can also be to a person on a list.

What this is about

Eight lists are named. Other parts of the government keep them. They name groups and people the United States has flagged. One list is about forced labor. Some are about arms and the Chinese army. One is about phone gear.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Small Business Innovation and Economic Security Act, Public Law 119-83, sec. 2, 140 Stat. 755 (2026).
    https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-119publ83/html/PLAW-119publ83.htm

  2. This page

    “A tie to an entity on one of eight named lists is a ground for denial,” Small Business Innovation and Economic Security Act, section 2, Sec. 2. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/small-business-innovation-economic-security-act/proposal/sec02-denial-lists/ (retrieved August 26, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →