Publishing a digital forgery of a minor is made unlawful
What the document says“it shall be unlawful for any person, in interstate or foreign commerce, to use an interactive computer service to knowingly publish a digital forgery of an identifiable individual who is a minor with intent to-- ``(i) abuse, humiliate, harass, or degrade the minor; or ``(ii) arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person.”
The fourth offense, and the mirror for digital forgeries of the offense in paragraph (2)(B). Publishing a digital forgery of an identifiable minor with intent to abuse, humiliate, harass or degrade the minor, or to arouse or gratify anyone's sexual desire, is unlawful. The exceptions in paragraph (3)(C) apply.
What the document actually says“it shall be unlawful for any person, in interstate or foreign commerce, to use an interactive computer service to knowingly publish a digital forgery of an identifiable individual who is a minor with intent to-- ``(i) abuse, humiliate, harass, or degrade the minor; or ``(ii) arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person.”
You cannot post a fake nude image of a child. Not to shame them. Not for sexual thrill.
A fake image counts the same as a real one here. What matters is what the poster meant to do.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.