Services carrying content the provider picked are excluded
What the document says“an online service, application, or website-- (I) that consists primarily of content that is not user generated but is preselected by the provider of such online service, application, or website; and (II) for which any chat, comment, or interactive functionality is incidental to, directly related to, or dependent on the provision of the content described in subclause (I).”
The third exclusion. A service, application or website is outside the term where it consists primarily of content preselected by its provider rather than generated by users, and where any chat, comment or interactive function is incidental to, directly related to or dependent on that content. The exclusion does not apply to a service that falls within subparagraph (A)(ii)(II).
What the document actually says“an online service, application, or website-- (I) that consists primarily of content that is not user generated but is preselected by the provider of such online service, application, or website; and (II) for which any chat, comment, or interactive functionality is incidental to, directly related to, or dependent on the provision of the content described in subclause (I).”
A site that picks most of what it shows is not covered. Talk on it must hang off that content.
The way out shuts in one case. It shuts if the site deals in these images as its trade.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.