Five terms are carried over from the subsection section 2 inserts
What the document says“The terms ``consent'', ``digital forgery'', ``identifiable individual'', ``intimate visual depiction'', and ``minor'' have the meaning given such terms in section 223(h) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 223), as added by section 2.”
The Act takes five terms from the subsection section 2 inserts into the Communications Act of 1934. The paragraph's own heading names four of them, and the text of the paragraph carries a fifth, minor, that the heading does not.
What the document actually says“The terms ``consent'', ``digital forgery'', ``identifiable individual'', ``intimate visual depiction'', and ``minor'' have the meaning given such terms in section 223(h) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 223), as added by section 2.”
Five words used here get their meaning from part 2.
Part 2 wrote them into the old 1934 law. This law uses those same meanings. The heading over this bit lists only four of the five.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.