On granting the motion the court must vacate, enter an acquittal and order the records expunged
What the document says“If the court grants a motion to vacate a conviction of a level A offense under subsection (b), the court shall immediately-- ``(A) vacate the conviction for cause; ``(B) set aside the verdict and enter a judgment of acquittal; and ``(C) enter an expungement order”
Three acts follow immediately on a grant. The court vacates the conviction for cause, sets aside the verdict and enters a judgment of acquittal, and enters an expungement order. The order directs that all references be expunged from all official records to the arrest of the movant for the offense, the institution of criminal proceedings relating to it, and the results of those proceedings.
What the document actually says“If the court grants a motion to vacate a conviction of a level A offense under subsection (b), the court shall immediately-- ``(A) vacate the conviction for cause; ``(B) set aside the verdict and enter a judgment of acquittal; and ``(C) enter an expungement order”
When the judge says yes, the judge must act at once. The guilty ruling goes away. The verdict is set aside and the person is found not guilty. An order to erase the records goes out.
The order covers three kinds of record. One is the arrest. One is the start of the case. One is how the case came out.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.