A pending negligence determination is no reason to withhold payment
To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the repayment by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs of benefits misused by a fiduciary, and for other purposes, section 2, Sec. 2.
Written by .
A pending negligence determination is no reason to withhold payment
The document says “may not”Who acts: Secretary of Veterans AffairsHow: statuteSec. 2 in the PDF
What the document says
“The Secretary may not withhold the reissuing of a benefit payment under subsection (a)(1) by reason of a pending determination under paragraph (1).”
Paragraph (2) of the new subsection (d). A determination under paragraph (1) that has not yet been made is not a ground for holding back the payment owed under subsection (a)(1). The two run separately: the payment is not conditioned on the negligence question being settled.
What the document actually says
“The Secretary may not withhold the reissuing of a benefit payment under subsection (a)(1) by reason of a pending determination under paragraph (1).”
That sentence, in plain words
The VA may not hold back a payment while it decides that.
What this is about
The VA may take a while to decide. The veteran gets the money now, not later.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page
number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary,
not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the
quotation rather than replacing it.
