The effects are not estimated for three named purposes
What the document says“the budgetary effects of this division and each succeeding division shall not be estimated-- (1) for purposes of section 251 of such Act; (2) for purposes of an allocation to the Committee on Appropriations pursuant to section 302(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974; and (3) for purposes of paragraph (4)(C) of section 3 of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 as being included in an appropriation Act.”
Subsection (c) of section 5021 bars estimating the budgetary effects of this division and each succeeding division for three purposes: section 251 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, an allocation to the Committee on Appropriations under section 302(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, and paragraph (4)(C) of section 3 of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010. It does so notwithstanding a scorekeeping guideline and section 250(c)(8) of the 1985 Act.
What the document actually says“the budgetary effects of this division and each succeeding division shall not be estimated-- (1) for purposes of section 251 of such Act; (2) for purposes of an allocation to the Committee on Appropriations pursuant to section 302(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974; and (3) for purposes of paragraph (4)(C) of section 3 of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 as being included in an appropriation Act.”
Do not add up the cost of these parts for three uses. Each use is named by an older budget law.
Budget rules take a cost figure and act on it. If the cost is not added up, the rules have nothing to act on.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.