This part keeps the cost of these parts of the law off the budget score sheets. It names two score sheets by law. It also says the cost is not to be counted for three other budget rules.
The document says “shall not”Who acts: Director of the Office of Management and BudgetHow: statuteSec. 5021 in the PDF
What the document says
“The budgetary effects of this division and each succeeding division shall not be entered on either PAYGO scorecard maintained pursuant to section 4(d) of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010.”
Subsection (a) of section 5021 provides that the budgetary effects of this division and each succeeding division are not entered on either scorecard kept under section 4(d) of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010.
What the document actually says
“The budgetary effects of this division and each succeeding division shall not be entered on either PAYGO scorecard maintained pursuant to section 4(d) of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010.”
That sentence, in plain words
Do not write the cost of these parts on either of the two score sheets kept under a 2010 budget law.
What this is about
A score sheet tracks whether new laws add to the deficit. If a cost goes on it, cuts can follow. This part keeps the cost off.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
The document says “shall not”Who acts: Senate Committee on the BudgetHow: statuteSec. 5021 in the PDF
What the document says
“The budgetary effects of this division and each succeeding division shall not be entered on any PAYGO scorecard maintained for purposes of section 4106 of H. Con. Res. 71 (115th Congress).”
Subsection (b) of section 5021 provides that the budgetary effects of this division and each succeeding division are not entered on any scorecard kept for purposes of section 4106 of H. Con. Res. 71 of the 115th Congress.
What the document actually says
“The budgetary effects of this division and each succeeding division shall not be entered on any PAYGO scorecard maintained for purposes of section 4106 of H. Con. Res. 71 (115th Congress).”
That sentence, in plain words
Do not write the cost of these parts on the Senate score sheet either.
What this is about
The Senate keeps its own score sheet under a budget resolution. This part keeps the cost off that sheet too.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
The document says “shall not”Who acts: Director of the Office of Management and Budget, Congressional Budget OfficeHow: statuteSec. 5021 in the PDF
What the document says
“the budgetary effects of this division and each succeeding division shall not be estimated--
(1) for purposes of section 251 of such Act;
(2) for purposes of an allocation to the Committee on Appropriations pursuant to section 302(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974; and
(3) for purposes of paragraph (4)(C) of section 3 of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 as being included in an appropriation Act.”
Subsection (c) of section 5021 bars estimating the budgetary effects of this division and each succeeding division for three purposes: section 251 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, an allocation to the Committee on Appropriations under section 302(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, and paragraph (4)(C) of section 3 of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010. It does so notwithstanding a scorekeeping guideline and section 250(c)(8) of the 1985 Act.
What the document actually says
“the budgetary effects of this division and each succeeding division shall not be estimated--
(1) for purposes of section 251 of such Act;
(2) for purposes of an allocation to the Committee on Appropriations pursuant to section 302(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974; and
(3) for purposes of paragraph (4)(C) of section 3 of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 as being included in an appropriation Act.”
That sentence, in plain words
Do not add up the cost of these parts for three uses. Each use is named by an older budget law.
What this is about
Budget rules take a cost figure and act on it. If the cost is not added up, the rules have nothing to act on.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
The three things the section does: keep the budgetary effects off the statutory PAYGO scorecards, keep them off the Senate PAYGO scorecard, and bar estimating them for three named purposes.
Nothing else in the section.
The section works against budget statutes and a congressional resolution that are not indexed here, so what those scorecards do with an entry is not recorded on this site.
