Read theMandate

Homeland Security and Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026.Section 5 › Proposal

$6,763,000 for Coast Guard research and development

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, section 5, Sec. 5. Written by .

$6,763,000 for Coast Guard research and development

The document says “shallWho acts: Commandant of the Coast GuardHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of the Coast Guard for research and development; and for maintenance, rehabilitation, lease, and operation of facilities and equipment; $6,763,000, to remain available until September 30, 2028”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The research and development appropriation for the Coast Guard. It stays available through September 30, 2028, includes $500,000 drawn from the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, and may be added to by money received from states, other public authorities, private sources and foreign countries for research work.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of the Coast Guard for research and development; and for maintenance, rehabilitation, lease, and operation of facilities and equipment; $6,763,000, to remain available until September 30, 2028”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The Coast Guard gets $6,763,000 for research. It may spend it up to September 30, 2028.

What this is about

States and other groups may chip in for this work. Their money is added to the account.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →