Read theMandate

Homeland Security and Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026. › Section 5

Statement of Appropriations

Section 5 · Sec. 5 ·

What this chapter is about

This part holds the money. It is nearly the whole law. It has two big parts inside it, called divisions. The first pays for homeland security for the year. It covers the border agency, airport screening, and the Coast Guard. It also pays for the Secret Service, cyber work, and disaster aid. It carries a long list of rules about how that money may be used. The second part deals with an earlier stopgap law.

157 proposals indexed from this chapter.

The document says “shallWho acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“The following sums in this Act are appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The opening sentence of section 5, and the sentence that makes the rest of the section an appropriation. Everything that follows it, both divisions and every account paragraph in them, is money appropriated out of the general fund for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026.

What the document actually says

“The following sums in this Act are appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Money is set aside here. It comes out of the Treasury. It is for the budget year that ends on September 30, 2026.

What this is about

Congress has to pass a law before money can be spent. This sentence does that. The rest of this part says who gets how much.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of the Office of the Secretary and for executive management for operations and support, $316,295,000”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The operations and support appropriation for the front offices of the Department of Homeland Security. The account paragraph directs that the money be used for the purposes and in the amounts specified in the Final Bill column of a table in the explanatory statement described in section 4, and that $22,050,000 of the amounts for the Office of Health Security stay available through September 30, 2027.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of the Office of the Secretary and for executive management for operations and support, $316,295,000”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The front offices of the department get $316,295,000 to run on for the year.

What this is about

These are the offices around the Secretary. They set policy and run the department. A table in a report says how to split the money up.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“That $5,000,000 shall be withheld from obligation until the Secretary submits to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate responses to all questions for the record for each hearing on the fiscal year 2027 budget submission for the Department of Homeland Security held by such Committees prior to July 1”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

A proviso on the front office account. Of the money appropriated, $5,000,000 cannot be committed until the Secretary sends both Appropriations Committees written answers to all of the questions for the record from each of their hearings on the department's fiscal year 2027 budget request held before July 1.

What the document actually says

“That $5,000,000 shall be withheld from obligation until the Secretary submits to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate responses to all questions for the record for each hearing on the fiscal year 2027 budget submission for the Department of Homeland Security held by such Committees prior to July 1”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

$5,000,000 is held back. The Secretary must first answer all the written questions from budget hearings. Then the money is free.

What this is about

After a hearing, members send in more questions in writing. Answers can be slow. This holds back money until the answers come in.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of the Office of the Secretary and for executive management for procurement, construction, and improvements, $8,911,000, to remain available until September 30, 2028.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The procurement, construction and improvements appropriation for the front offices of the department. The whole of it stays available through September 30, 2028, rather than lapsing at the end of the fiscal year.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of the Office of the Secretary and for executive management for procurement, construction, and improvements, $8,911,000, to remain available until September 30, 2028.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The front offices get $8,911,000 to buy things and fix up space. They can spend it up to September 30, 2028.

What this is about

Some money must be used within one year. This kind may be spent over three years. Building work takes longer than a year.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of the Management Directorate for operations and support, including vehicle fleet modernization, $1,690,380,000”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The operations and support appropriation for the Management Directorate, the part of the department that handles its buildings, vehicles, contracting, human capital and information technology. The account paragraph names vehicle fleet modernization as an included expense and directs that the money be used for the purposes and in the amounts specified in the Final Bill column of a table in the explanatory statement described in section 4.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of the Management Directorate for operations and support, including vehicle fleet modernization, $1,690,380,000”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The office that runs the department's own business gets $1,690,380,000. Some of it goes to newer vehicles.

What this is about

This office does the back office work. It buys things, hires people, and keeps the computers running. The car fleet is part of its job.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of the Management Directorate for procurement, construction, and improvements, $58,106,000, to remain available until September 30, 2028.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The procurement, construction and improvements appropriation for the Management Directorate. The whole of it stays available through September 30, 2028.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of the Management Directorate for procurement, construction, and improvements, $58,106,000, to remain available until September 30, 2028.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The back office gets $58,106,000 to buy things and build. It can spend the money up to September 30, 2028.

What this is about

This pays for big purchases, not day to day costs. Those take more than one year to finish.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“The revenues and collections of security fees credited to this account shall be available until expended for necessary expenses related to the protection of federally owned and leased buildings and for the operations of the Federal Protective Service.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The Federal Protective Service account. Unlike the other accounts in this title it names no sum: the account is funded by the security fees charged to the agencies whose buildings the service guards, and those fees stay available until spent.

What the document actually says

“The revenues and collections of security fees credited to this account shall be available until expended for necessary expenses related to the protection of federally owned and leased buildings and for the operations of the Federal Protective Service.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Fees paid for building security go into this account. The money stays there until it is used. It guards federal buildings.

What this is about

This account gets no set sum here. Other agencies pay fees for guard service. Those fees are what pay for the work.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis and the Office of Homeland Security Situational Awareness for operations and support, $340,819,000, of which $121,274,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2027”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The operations and support appropriation shared by the Office of Intelligence and Analysis and the Office of Homeland Security Situational Awareness. Of the total, $121,274,000 stays available through September 30, 2027, and the account paragraph makes up to $2,000,000 available for facility needs associated with secure space at fusion centers.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis and the Office of Homeland Security Situational Awareness for operations and support, $340,819,000, of which $121,274,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2027”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

These two offices get $340,819,000 together. Of that, $121,274,000 can be used up to September 30, 2027.

What this is about

One office studies threats. The other keeps watch and passes word along. Some money pays for secure rooms at state hubs.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Inspector General of the Department of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of the Office of Inspector General for operations and support, $257,599,000, of which $20,000,000 shall be for additional inspections and oversight of detention facilities and shall remain available until September 30, 2027”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The appropriation for the department's Inspector General. Of the total, $20,000,000 is directed to additional inspections and oversight of detention facilities, $12,814,000 is directed to oversight of the execution of funds provided in Public Law 119-21, and up to $300,000 may be used for confidential operational expenses at the direction of the Inspector General.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of the Office of Inspector General for operations and support, $257,599,000, of which $20,000,000 shall be for additional inspections and oversight of detention facilities and shall remain available until September 30, 2027”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The watchdog office gets $257,599,000. Of that, $20,000,000 is for extra checks on places where people are held.

What this is about

An inspector general looks for waste and abuse inside an agency. Here some money is aimed at detention sites. Some is aimed at money from an earlier law.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“The Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit a report not later than October 15, 2026, to the Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security listing all grants and contracts awarded by any means other than full and open competition during fiscal years 2025 or 2026.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 101(a). The Secretary must give the Inspector General, by October 15, 2026, a list of every grant and contract the department awarded other than by full and open competition in fiscal year 2025 or 2026. Subsection (b) then requires the Inspector General to review that list and report the results to both Appropriations Committees by February 15, 2027.

What the document actually says

“The Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit a report not later than October 15, 2026, to the Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security listing all grants and contracts awarded by any means other than full and open competition during fiscal years 2025 or 2026.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

By October 15, 2026, the Secretary must hand the watchdog a list. It shows every grant and contract not put out for open bids.

What this is about

Most contracts go to the best bid. Some are handed out without a contest. This makes the department list those.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Chief Financial Officer of the Department of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Not later than 30 days after the last day of each month, the Chief Financial Officer of the Department of Homeland Security shall submit to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate a monthly budget and staffing report”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 102(a). Within 30 days of the end of each month, the department's Chief Financial Officer must send both Appropriations Committees a report showing total obligations for the month and for the year to date, at the appropriation level and at the program, project and activity level, by the year the money was appropriated. Subsection (b) makes the first staffing report the baseline against which staffing increases and decreases are measured under section 503(a)(4).

What the document actually says

“Not later than 30 days after the last day of each month, the Chief Financial Officer of the Department of Homeland Security shall submit to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate a monthly budget and staffing report”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Each month the department must send Congress a report. Its top money officer signs it. The report shows spending and staff counts.

What this is about

The report has to break spending down by program. The first one sets a starting count of staff. Later changes are measured from it.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds identified for such a transfer may be obligated until the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate are notified of the proposed transfer.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 103(b). Subsection (a) requires the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, to notify both Appropriations Committees of any proposed transfer from the Department of the Treasury Forfeiture Fund to an agency within the Department of Homeland Security under section 9705(g)(4)(B) of title 31. This subsection bars the money from being committed until that notice has been given.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds identified for such a transfer may be obligated until the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate are notified of the proposed transfer.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Money moved over from a seized property fund cannot be spent yet. Congress must be told about the move first.

What this is about

Some property seized in cases is sold. The cash goes into a fund. Moving it to homeland security needs notice first.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“All official costs associated with the use of Government aircraft by Department of Homeland Security personnel to support official travel of the Secretary and the Deputy Secretary shall be paid from amounts made available for the Office of the Secretary.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 104. Where department personnel use government aircraft to support official travel by the Secretary or the Deputy Secretary, the cost is charged to the Office of the Secretary rather than to the component that owns or flies the aircraft.

What the document actually says

“All official costs associated with the use of Government aircraft by Department of Homeland Security personnel to support official travel of the Secretary and the Deputy Secretary shall be paid from amounts made available for the Office of the Secretary.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The head of the department may fly on a federal plane. If so, the bill goes to their own office.

What this is about

The Coast Guard and the border agency own planes. Their crews may fly these trips. The bill still goes to the Secretary's office.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Under Secretary for ManagementHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“The Under Secretary for Management shall brief the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate not later than 45 days after the end of each fiscal quarter on all Level 1 and Level 2 acquisition programs on the Master Acquisition Oversight List”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 105(a). Within 45 days of the end of each quarter the Under Secretary for Management must brief both Appropriations Committees on every Level 1 and Level 2 acquisition program on the Master Acquisition Oversight List between acquisition decision event and full operational capability, including programs removed from the list during the quarter. Subsection (b) lists nine things each briefing must cover, among them cost and schedule against the approved baseline, lifecycle cost estimates, prime contractors and risks of a program breach. Subsection (c) requires each approved Acquisition Decision Memorandum to be sent to the Committees within five business days of approval.

What the document actually says

“The Under Secretary for Management shall brief the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate not later than 45 days after the end of each fiscal quarter on all Level 1 and Level 2 acquisition programs on the Master Acquisition Oversight List”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Four times a year, a top manager must brief Congress. The subject is the department's biggest buying programs.

What this is about

A big program can be a new ship or a new computer system. They run late and cost more than planned. The briefing tracks that.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Under Secretary for ManagementHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds made available to the Department of Homeland Security in this Act or prior appropriations Acts may be obligated for any new pilot or demonstration unless the component or office carrying out such pilot or demonstration has documented the information described in subsection (c).”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 106(a). No money from this Act or an earlier appropriations act may be committed to a new pilot or demonstration until the component running it has written down the items listed in subsection (c): measurable objectives, an assessment methodology and an implementation plan with milestones, cost estimates and a projected end date. Subsection (e) defines a pilot for this purpose as one using more than 10 full-time equivalents or obligating $5,000,000 or more, and subsection (d) requires a lessons learned report within 90 days of completion.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds made available to the Department of Homeland Security in this Act or prior appropriations Acts may be obligated for any new pilot or demonstration unless the component or office carrying out such pilot or demonstration has documented the information described in subsection (c).”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

No money may go to a new trial program yet. First the office running it must write down its plan.

What this is about

A pilot is a small test before a big rollout. This asks for goals, a way to measure them, and an end date. Only larger pilots are covered.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Office of Intelligence and AnalysisHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used by the Office of Intelligence and Analysis of the Department of Homeland Security to conduct a covered activity (as defined by section 6303 of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025 (division F of Public Law 118-159)).”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 107(a). Money in this Act may not be used by the Office of Intelligence and Analysis to conduct what section 6303 of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025 calls a covered activity. That definition sits in Public Law 118-159, which is not indexed here. Subsections (b) and (c) provide that the section does not limit legal, privacy, civil rights or civil liberties oversight of the office, and does not stop it sharing intelligence with other governments, the private sector or other federal agencies.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used by the Office of Intelligence and Analysis of the Department of Homeland Security to conduct a covered activity (as defined by section 6303 of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025 (division F of Public Law 118-159)).”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The department's intelligence office may not use this money for one kind of work. Another law says what that work is.

What this is about

The name of the barred work is set in a different law. That law is not indexed here. So this site does not say what it covers.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Inspector General of the Department of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“The Inspector General shall report to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate on a quarterly basis on oversight of the funding provided to the Department in Public Law 119-21.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 108(a). The Inspector General must report every quarter on oversight of the money the department was given in Public Law 119-21. Subsection (b) requires each report to review the spend plans for every program funded under that law, comparing obligations against projections, and to summarize the audits under way on the department's contracting and procurement. Subsection (c) adds an annual comprehensive report, starting one year after enactment, with recommendations on preventing waste, fraud and abuse.

What the document actually says

“The Inspector General shall report to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate on a quarterly basis on oversight of the funding provided to the Department in Public Law 119-21.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Four times a year the watchdog must report to Congress. The subject is money the department got from an earlier law.

What this is about

That earlier law gave the department a large sum. This asks how it is being spent. The reports compare plans against real spending.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For an additional amount for ``Office of the Secretary and Executive Management--Operations and Support--Office of the Secretary'', $20,000,000, for the procurement, deployment, and operations of body-worn cameras for agents and officers performing enforcement activities under 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 109(a). A further $20,000,000 is appropriated to the Office of the Secretary to buy, deploy and operate body-worn cameras for agents and officers carrying out enforcement activities under the immigration laws in chapter 12 of title 8. Subsection (b) requires the Secretary to give both Appropriations Committees a spend plan for the money within 30 days of enactment.

What the document actually says

“For an additional amount for ``Office of the Secretary and Executive Management--Operations and Support--Office of the Secretary'', $20,000,000, for the procurement, deployment, and operations of body-worn cameras for agents and officers performing enforcement activities under 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Another $20,000,000 goes to the Secretary's office. It buys body cameras for officers. They wear them on the job.

What this is about

A body camera records what an officer sees and says. The money buys them and keeps them running. A spending plan is due in 30 days.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“the purchase and lease of up to 7,500 (6,500 for replacement only) police-type vehicles; the purchase, maintenance, or operation of marine vessels, aircraft, and unmanned aerial systems; and contracting with individuals for personal services abroad; $11,083,012,000”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The operations and support appropriation for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, one of the largest accounts in the Act. The quotation is the close of an account paragraph that runs for hundreds of words and lists what the money may be spent on, including the transportation of unaccompanied alien minors, air and marine support to other agencies, and the vehicles and vessels named here. Of the total, $550,000,000 stays available through September 30, 2027, and $3,274,000 is drawn from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund.

What the document actually says

“the purchase and lease of up to 7,500 (6,500 for replacement only) police-type vehicles; the purchase, maintenance, or operation of marine vessels, aircraft, and unmanned aerial systems; and contracting with individuals for personal services abroad; $11,083,012,000”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The border agency gets $11,083,012,000 to run on. It may buy up to 7,500 police cars. It may also buy boats, planes, and drones.

What this is about

This agency staffs ports of entry and patrols the border. Most of the money pays its staff. Some of it buys and fixes its fleet.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“of which such sums as become available in the Customs User Fee Account, except sums subject to section 13031(f)(3) of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C. 58c(f)(3)), shall be derived from that account”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Part of the same account paragraph. It provides that whatever becomes available in the Customs User Fee Account, other than sums subject to section 13031(f)(3) of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, is drawn from that account rather than from the general fund. The size of the general fund share therefore depends on how much fee revenue arrives during the year.

What the document actually says

“of which such sums as become available in the Customs User Fee Account, except sums subject to section 13031(f)(3) of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C. 58c(f)(3)), shall be derived from that account”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Money in the customs fee account is used first. One set of fees is left out of this rule.

What this is about

Travelers and shippers pay customs fees. Those fees sit in their own account. What is in there counts toward the total.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of U.S. Customs and Border Protection for procurement, construction, and improvements, including procurement of marine vessels, aircraft, and unmanned aerial systems, $222,886,000”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The procurement, construction and improvements appropriation for U.S. Customs and Border Protection. The account paragraph directs the money to the purposes and amounts specified in the Final Bill column of a table in the explanatory statement described in section 4, keeps the amounts for border security, trade and travel, integrated operations, mission support and radiological detection available through September 30, 2028, and keeps the amounts for construction and facility improvements available through September 30, 2030.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of U.S. Customs and Border Protection for procurement, construction, and improvements, including procurement of marine vessels, aircraft, and unmanned aerial systems, $222,886,000”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The border agency gets $222,886,000 to build and to buy. That covers boats, planes, and drones.

What this is about

This money is not for staff pay. It buys gear and puts up buildings. Building money may be spent over five years.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Transportation Security AdministrationHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of the Transportation Security Administration for operations and support, $10,635,434,000, of which $300,000,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2027”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The operations and support appropriation for the Transportation Security Administration, which screens passengers and baggage at airports. Of the total, $300,000,000 stays available through September 30, 2027.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of the Transportation Security Administration for operations and support, $10,635,434,000, of which $300,000,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2027”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The screening agency gets $10,635,434,000. Of that, $300,000,000 can be used up to September 30, 2027.

What this is about

This agency checks people and bags at airports. Most of the money pays the screeners. It also guards other kinds of travel.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Transportation Security AdministrationHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“security service fees authorized under section 44940 of title 49, United States Code, shall be credited to this appropriation as offsetting collections and shall be available only for aviation security”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

A proviso on the screening account. The security service fee charged on air tickets is credited to the account as an offsetting collection and may be used only for aviation security. A further proviso reduces the general fund share dollar for dollar as those fees arrive, with the result that the account paragraph estimates a final general fund appropriation of not more than $7,605,434,000.

What the document actually says

“security service fees authorized under section 44940 of title 49, United States Code, shall be credited to this appropriation as offsetting collections and shall be available only for aviation security”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

A fee is charged on air travel. It goes into this account. It may only pay for air security.

What this is about

As fee money comes in, the share from the Treasury drops. The law puts that final share at about $7,605,434,000.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Transportation Security AdministrationHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of the Transportation Security Administration for procurement, construction, and improvements, $330,230,000, to remain available until September 30, 2028.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The procurement, construction and improvements appropriation for the Transportation Security Administration. The whole of it stays available through September 30, 2028.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of the Transportation Security Administration for procurement, construction, and improvements, $330,230,000, to remain available until September 30, 2028.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The screening agency gets $330,230,000 to buy gear and build. It may spend it up to September 30, 2028.

What this is about

Scanners and bag machines cost a lot. They are bought over several years. This is the money for that.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Transportation Security AdministrationHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of the Transportation Security Administration for research and development, $24,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2027.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The research and development appropriation for the Transportation Security Administration. It stays available through September 30, 2027.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of the Transportation Security Administration for research and development, $24,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2027.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The screening agency gets $24,000,000 for research. It may use it up to September 30, 2027.

What this is about

This is the smallest of its three accounts. It pays to test new ways to screen.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Commandant of the Coast GuardHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“payments pursuant to section 156 of Public Law 97-377 (42 U.S.C. 402 note; 96 Stat. 1920); and recreation and welfare; $11,272,401,000, of which $530,000,000 shall be for defense-related activities”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The operations and support appropriation for the Coast Guard. The quotation is the close of a long account paragraph that also covers the Coast Guard Reserve, up to 30 replacement passenger vehicles, and small boats. Of the total, $530,000,000 is for defense-related activities, $24,500,000 is drawn from the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, and $25,335,000 stays available through September 30, 2030, for environmental compliance and restoration.

What the document actually says

“payments pursuant to section 156 of Public Law 97-377 (42 U.S.C. 402 note; 96 Stat. 1920); and recreation and welfare; $11,272,401,000, of which $530,000,000 shall be for defense-related activities”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The Coast Guard gets $11,272,401,000 to run on. Of that, $530,000,000 is for defense work.

What this is about

The Coast Guard saves lives at sea and stops smuggling. In war it works with the Navy. This money pays its crews and runs its boats.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Commandant of the Coast GuardHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“of which $400,000,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2027, which shall only be available for depot level maintenance”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Part of the same account paragraph. Of the Coast Guard's operations and support money, $400,000,000 stays available through September 30, 2027, and may be used only for depot level maintenance, the heavy overhaul work done on ships and aircraft away from their home units.

What the document actually says

“of which $400,000,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2027, which shall only be available for depot level maintenance”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Of that money, $400,000,000 is set aside. It may only pay for heavy repair work.

What this is about

A ship comes in for a full overhaul every few years. That work takes longer than one budget year. So this money lasts two years.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Commandant of the Coast GuardHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of the Coast Guard for procurement, construction, and improvements, including aids to navigation, shore facilities (including facilities at Department of Defense installations used by the Coast Guard), and vessels and aircraft, including equipment related thereto, $991,872,000, to remain available until September 30, 2030”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The procurement, construction and improvements appropriation for the Coast Guard. It covers aids to navigation, shore facilities, vessels and aircraft, stays available through September 30, 2030, and includes $20,000,000 drawn from the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of the Coast Guard for procurement, construction, and improvements, including aids to navigation, shore facilities (including facilities at Department of Defense installations used by the Coast Guard), and vessels and aircraft, including equipment related thereto, $991,872,000, to remain available until September 30, 2030”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The Coast Guard gets $991,872,000 to build and to buy. It may spend the money up to September 30, 2030.

What this is about

New ships take years to build. So does a new base. This money may be held that long.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Commandant of the Coast GuardHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of the Coast Guard for research and development; and for maintenance, rehabilitation, lease, and operation of facilities and equipment; $6,763,000, to remain available until September 30, 2028”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The research and development appropriation for the Coast Guard. It stays available through September 30, 2028, includes $500,000 drawn from the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, and may be added to by money received from states, other public authorities, private sources and foreign countries for research work.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of the Coast Guard for research and development; and for maintenance, rehabilitation, lease, and operation of facilities and equipment; $6,763,000, to remain available until September 30, 2028”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The Coast Guard gets $6,763,000 for research. It may spend it up to September 30, 2028.

What this is about

States and other groups may chip in for this work. Their money is added to the account.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Commandant of the Coast GuardHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For retired pay, including the payment of obligations otherwise chargeable to lapsed appropriations for this purpose, payments under the Retired Serviceman's Family Protection and Survivor Benefits Plans, payment for career status bonuses, payment of continuation pay under section 356 of title 37, United States Code, concurrent receipts, combat-related special compensation, and payments for medical care of retired personnel and their dependents under chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, $1,249,000,000, to remain available until expended.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The retired pay account for the Coast Guard. It covers pensions, survivor benefit plans, career status bonuses, continuation pay, concurrent receipts, combat-related special compensation, and medical care for retired personnel and their dependents. The money stays available until spent.

What the document actually says

“For retired pay, including the payment of obligations otherwise chargeable to lapsed appropriations for this purpose, payments under the Retired Serviceman's Family Protection and Survivor Benefits Plans, payment for career status bonuses, payment of continuation pay under section 356 of title 37, United States Code, concurrent receipts, combat-related special compensation, and payments for medical care of retired personnel and their dependents under chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, $1,249,000,000, to remain available until expended.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Retired Coast Guard pay costs $1,249,000,000. The money also covers care for retirees and their families.

What this is about

People who served draw a pension for life. Some also draw extra pay for wounds. This account pays all of that.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Director of the United States Secret ServiceHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“$3,128,304,000, of which $96,299,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2027, and of which $20,000,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2028”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The operations and support appropriation for the United States Secret Service. The quotation is the close of a long account paragraph that also covers up to 652 police-type vehicles, the hire of aircraft, fencing and guard booths on private property, and subsistence expenses for employees on protective missions.

What the document actually says

“$3,128,304,000, of which $96,299,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2027, and of which $20,000,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2028”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The Secret Service gets $3,128,304,000. Some of it may be held past this year. The rest must be used now.

What this is about

This force guards the President and others. It also works fraud cases. Most of the money pays its agents.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Director of the United States Secret ServiceHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“of which $6,000,000 shall be for a grant for activities related to investigations of missing and exploited children”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Part of the same account paragraph. Of the Secret Service's operations and support money, $6,000,000 is directed to a grant for activities related to investigations of missing and exploited children.

What the document actually says

“of which $6,000,000 shall be for a grant for activities related to investigations of missing and exploited children”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Of that money, $6,000,000 is a grant. It helps with cases of missing and abused children.

What this is about

The grant goes outside the agency. It pays for work on these cases. The law does not name who gets it.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “canWho acts: Director of the United States Secret ServiceHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“of which up to $33,000,000 may be for calendar year 2025 premium pay in excess of the annual equivalent of the limitation on the rate of pay contained in section 5547(a) of title 5, United States Code”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Part of the same account paragraph. Up to $33,000,000 may be used for calendar year 2025 premium pay above the annual cap in section 5547(a) of title 5, using the authority in section 2 of the Overtime Pay for Protective Services Act of 2016 as last amended by Public Law 118-38.

What the document actually says

“of which up to $33,000,000 may be for calendar year 2025 premium pay in excess of the annual equivalent of the limitation on the rate of pay contained in section 5547(a) of title 5, United States Code”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Up to $33,000,000 may pay for extra hours in 2025. That pay goes above the normal yearly cap.

What this is about

There is a limit on how much extra pay a worker may draw in a year. Agents on long details hit it. This lifts the limit for some of them.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Director of the United States Secret ServiceHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of the United States Secret Service for procurement, construction, and improvements, $118,517,000, of which $96,167,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2028, and of which $22,350,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2030.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The procurement, construction and improvements appropriation for the United States Secret Service. Of the total, $96,167,000 stays available through September 30, 2028, and $22,350,000 through September 30, 2030.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of the United States Secret Service for procurement, construction, and improvements, $118,517,000, of which $96,167,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2028, and of which $22,350,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2030.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The Secret Service gets $118,517,000 to build and to buy. Part of it may be held until 2030.

What this is about

This pays for gear and for work on its sites. Big jobs take years. So the money is held that long.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Director of the United States Secret ServiceHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of the United States Secret Service for research and development, $3,250,000, to remain available until September 30, 2027.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The research and development appropriation for the United States Secret Service. It stays available through September 30, 2027.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of the United States Secret Service for research and development, $3,250,000, to remain available until September 30, 2027.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The Secret Service gets $3,250,000 for research. It may use it up to September 30, 2027.

What this is about

This is the smallest of its three accounts. It pays to test new tools.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shall applyWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Section 201 of the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2018 (division F of Public Law 115-141), related to overtime compensation limitations, shall apply with respect to funds made available in this Act in the same manner as such section applied to funds made available in that Act, except that ``fiscal year 2026'' shall be substituted for ``fiscal year 2018''.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 201. Rather than restating them, this section carries forward a provision of the 2018 homeland security appropriations act, described in this Act's own words as related to overtime compensation limitations, and applies it to the money in this Act with the year changed. What that provision says is in Public Law 115-141, which is not indexed here.

What the document actually says

“Section 201 of the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2018 (division F of Public Law 115-141), related to overtime compensation limitations, shall apply with respect to funds made available in this Act in the same manner as such section applied to funds made available in that Act, except that ``fiscal year 2026'' shall be substituted for ``fiscal year 2018''.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

A rule from a 2018 law is used again. It applies to money in this law. The year in it is changed to 2026.

What this is about

Rather than write the rule out again, the law points at an old one. That old law is not indexed here. So this site does not say what the rule holds.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“As authorized by section 601(b) of the United States-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement Implementation Act (Public Law 112-42), fees collected from passengers arriving from Canada, Mexico, or an adjacent island pursuant to section 13031(a)(5) of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C. 58c(a)(5)) shall be available until expended.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 202. Customs fees collected from passengers arriving from Canada, Mexico or an adjacent island do not lapse at the end of the fiscal year but stay available until spent.

What the document actually says

“As authorized by section 601(b) of the United States-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement Implementation Act (Public Law 112-42), fees collected from passengers arriving from Canada, Mexico, or an adjacent island pursuant to section 13031(a)(5) of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C. 58c(a)(5)) shall be available until expended.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Some travelers pay a customs fee when they arrive. That money does not run out at year end. It stays until it is used.

What this is about

Most yearly money must be used by September 30. Fee money like this may be held. The fee comes from short trips to nearby places.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shall notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“until the Secretary of Homeland Security, after consultation with the Secretaries of the Departments of Energy and Transportation and representatives from the United States flag maritime industry, takes adequate measures to ensure the use of United States flag vessels.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 203(a). No funds in this or any other Act may be used to approve a waiver of the navigation and vessel inspection laws under section 501(b) of title 46 for moving crude oil to or from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve until the Secretary has consulted the Secretaries of Energy and Transportation and the United States flag maritime industry and taken adequate measures to ensure United States flag vessels are used.

What the document actually says

“until the Secretary of Homeland Security, after consultation with the Secretaries of the Departments of Energy and Transportation and representatives from the United States flag maritime industry, takes adequate measures to ensure the use of United States flag vessels.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

First the Secretary must talk to two other agencies. Ship owners must be asked too. Then steps must be taken so American ships are used.

What this is about

The law says oil moved between American ports must travel on American ships. That rule can be waived. Here it may not be, until those steps are taken.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“The Secretary shall notify the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate within two business days of any request for waivers of navigation and vessel-inspection laws”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 203(b). Within two business days of any request for a waiver of the navigation and vessel inspection laws under section 501(b) of title 46 for Strategic Petroleum Reserve shipments, the Secretary must tell both Appropriations Committees, the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee and the Senate Commerce Committee, and must also report how the request was disposed of.

What the document actually says

“The Secretary shall notify the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate within two business days of any request for waivers of navigation and vessel-inspection laws”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

If someone asks to skip the shipping rules, the Secretary must tell four committees. That must happen within two work days.

What this is about

The notice must also say what came of the request. Two work days is a short window. That keeps the news current.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shall notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall not-- (1) establish, collect, or otherwise impose any new border crossing fee on individuals crossing the Southern border or the Northern border at a land port of entry; or (2) conduct any study relating to the imposition of a border crossing fee.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 204(a). From the date of enactment, the Secretary may not create, collect or impose any new border crossing fee at a land port of entry on either border, and may not study imposing one. Subsection (b) defines a border crossing fee as one every pedestrian, cyclist, and driver and passenger of a private motor vehicle must pay for the privilege of crossing at a land port of entry.

What the document actually says

“Beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall not-- (1) establish, collect, or otherwise impose any new border crossing fee on individuals crossing the Southern border or the Northern border at a land port of entry; or (2) conduct any study relating to the imposition of a border crossing fee.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The Secretary may not start a new fee for crossing the border by land. The Secretary may not even study one.

What this is about

This covers walkers, riders and drivers at land crossings. The law spells out what counts as such a fee. Fees that already exist are not touched.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border ProtectionHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall submit an expenditure plan for any amounts made available for”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 205(a). Within 90 days of enactment the Commissioner must give both Appropriations Committees an expenditure plan covering the border agency's procurement, construction and improvements money from this Act and from earlier acts. Subsection (b) bars any of this Act's money under that heading from being committed until the plan has been submitted.

What the document actually says

“Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall submit an expenditure plan for any amounts made available for”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Within 90 days, the head of the border agency must file a spending plan. It covers its building and buying money.

What this is about

The plan covers money from this law and from older ones. None of the new money may be spent until it arrives.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds provided by this Act, provided by previous appropriations Acts that remain available for obligation or expenditure in fiscal year 2026, or provided from any accounts in the Treasury of the United States derived by the collection of fees available to the components funded by this Act, may be used to reduce anticipated or planned vetting operations at existing locations”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 206(b). No money from this Act, from earlier acts still available in fiscal year 2026, or from fee accounts, may be used to reduce anticipated or planned vetting operations at existing locations unless a statute enacted after this one specifically allows it. Subsection (a) separately provides that funds in this Act may be used to alter operations within the National Targeting Center.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds provided by this Act, provided by previous appropriations Acts that remain available for obligation or expenditure in fiscal year 2026, or provided from any accounts in the Treasury of the United States derived by the collection of fees available to the components funded by this Act, may be used to reduce anticipated or planned vetting operations at existing locations”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

This money may not be used to cut back checks at places that already do them. That holds for old money and fee money too.

What this is about

Vetting means checking people and cargo against records. Congress would have to pass a new law to allow a cut.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shall notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds made available for Border Security Assets and Infrastructure under the heading ``U.S. Customs and Border Protection--Procurement, Construction, and Improvements'' in this Act or prior appropriations Acts shall be used for the procurement or deployment of surveillance systems that are not autonomous, as such term is defined in section 90004 of Public Law 119-21.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 207. Money for border security assets and infrastructure, in this Act or an earlier one, may not buy or deploy a surveillance system that is not autonomous. The term autonomous is defined in section 90004 of Public Law 119-21, which is not indexed here.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds made available for Border Security Assets and Infrastructure under the heading ``U.S. Customs and Border Protection--Procurement, Construction, and Improvements'' in this Act or prior appropriations Acts shall be used for the procurement or deployment of surveillance systems that are not autonomous, as such term is defined in section 90004 of Public Law 119-21.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

This money may not buy watch systems that are not autonomous. Another law says what that word means.

What this is about

The word is set in a different law. That law is not indexed here. So this site does not say which systems pass.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“The Secretary shall ensure that the November 30, 2021, policy statement from U.S. Customs and Border Protection titled ``Policy Statement and Required Actions Regarding Pregnant, Postpartum, Nursing Individuals, and Infants in Custody,'' or substantively similar standards of treatment developed in consultation with maternal and pediatric health providers and experts, are in effect and are fully implemented”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 208. The Secretary must keep in effect and fully implement the border agency's policy statement of November 30, 2021 on pregnant, postpartum and nursing individuals and infants in custody, or standards substantively similar to it developed with maternal and pediatric health providers. The section states that the purpose is to safeguard the health, safety and rights of pregnant women in the agency's custody.

What the document actually says

“The Secretary shall ensure that the November 30, 2021, policy statement from U.S. Customs and Border Protection titled ``Policy Statement and Required Actions Regarding Pregnant, Postpartum, Nursing Individuals, and Infants in Custody,'' or substantively similar standards of treatment developed in consultation with maternal and pediatric health providers and experts, are in effect and are fully implemented”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

A 2021 policy on pregnant people in custody must stay in force. A close match may be used instead. Doctors must help write it.

What this is about

The policy sets how the agency treats them while held. It also covers new mothers and babies. It must be followed, not just filed.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shall notWho acts: Administrator of the Transportation Security AdministrationHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Members of the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate, including the leadership; the heads of Federal agencies and commissions, including the Secretary, Deputy Secretary, Under Secretaries, and Assistant Secretaries of the Department of Homeland Security; the United States Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, Assistant Attorneys General, and the United States Attorneys; and senior members of the Executive Office of the President, including the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, shall not be exempt from Federal passenger and baggage screening.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 209(a). The section lists officials who are not exempt from federal passenger and baggage screening: members of Congress including the leadership, heads of federal agencies and commissions, named senior officials of the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice, and senior White House officials including the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. Subsection (b) bars funds in this or any other act from being used to carry out legislation that changes how those screening requirements apply.

What the document actually says

“Members of the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate, including the leadership; the heads of Federal agencies and commissions, including the Secretary, Deputy Secretary, Under Secretaries, and Assistant Secretaries of the Department of Homeland Security; the United States Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, Assistant Attorneys General, and the United States Attorneys; and senior members of the Executive Office of the President, including the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, shall not be exempt from Federal passenger and baggage screening.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Members of Congress and top officials must be screened like anyone else. Their bags must be screened too.

What this is about

The list names both chambers, agency heads, and top White House staff. No money may be used to change this rule.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “canWho acts: Administrator of the Transportation Security AdministrationHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“any funds in the Aviation Security Capital Fund established by section 44923(h) of title 49, United States Code, may be used for the procurement and installation of explosives detection systems or for the issuance of other transaction agreements for the purpose of funding projects described in section 44923(a) of such title”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 210. For fiscal year 2026, and notwithstanding section 44923 of title 49, money in the Aviation Security Capital Fund may be used to buy and install explosives detection systems, or to issue other transaction agreements funding the projects described in section 44923(a).

What the document actually says

“any funds in the Aviation Security Capital Fund established by section 44923(h) of title 49, United States Code, may be used for the procurement and installation of explosives detection systems or for the issuance of other transaction agreements for the purpose of funding projects described in section 44923(a) of such title”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Money in an airport safety fund may buy bomb detectors. It may also pay for other deals on such projects.

What this is about

The fund pays for airport screening projects. This widens what it may pay for. The change is for this year only.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “is amendedWho acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Section 515(b) of Public Law 108-334 (49 U.S.C. 44945 note) is amended by striking ``report'' each place it appears (including in the subsection heading) and inserting ``briefing'' and by striking ``transmit to'' and inserting ``provide''.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 212. A textual amendment to section 515(b) of Public Law 108-334. Every appearance of the word report, including in the subsection heading, is replaced with briefing, and transmit to is replaced with provide. What the amended provision requires is in Public Law 108-334, which is not indexed here.

What the document actually says

“Section 515(b) of Public Law 108-334 (49 U.S.C. 44945 note) is amended by striking ``report'' each place it appears (including in the subsection heading) and inserting ``briefing'' and by striking ``transmit to'' and inserting ``provide''.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

In an old law, one word is swapped for another. Report becomes briefing. Transmit to becomes provide.

What this is about

A report is written down. A briefing is spoken. The old law is not indexed here, so this site does not say what it covers.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shall notWho acts: Commandant of the Coast GuardHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds made available by this Act under the heading ``Coast Guard--Operations and Support'' shall be for expenses incurred for recreational vessels under section 12114 of title 46, United States Code, except to the extent fees are collected from owners of yachts”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 213(a). Coast Guard operations money may not pay the cost of documenting recreational vessels under section 12114 of title 46, except so far as fees collected from yacht owners are credited to that account. Subsection (b) allows staff who document other vessels to work on recreational applications where the fees fall short and a backlog has built up.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds made available by this Act under the heading ``Coast Guard--Operations and Support'' shall be for expenses incurred for recreational vessels under section 12114 of title 46, United States Code, except to the extent fees are collected from owners of yachts”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Coast Guard funds may not pay to register pleasure boats. Fees from yacht owners must cover that work.

What this is about

Boat owners file papers to register a boat. Here the owners pay for the work. If fees fall short, other staff may pitch in.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Commandant of the Coast GuardHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Commandant of the Coast Guard shall submit to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate a future-years capital investment plan as described in the second proviso under the heading ``Coast Guard--Acquisition, Construction, and Improvements'' in the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2015 (Public Law 114-4)”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 214. The Commandant must give both Appropriations Committees a future years capital investment plan in the form described in the 2015 homeland security appropriations act, subject to the requirements in the third and fourth provisos under that heading. What those provisos require is in Public Law 114-4, which is not indexed here.

What the document actually says

“Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Commandant of the Coast Guard shall submit to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate a future-years capital investment plan as described in the second proviso under the heading ``Coast Guard--Acquisition, Construction, and Improvements'' in the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2015 (Public Law 114-4)”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The head of the Coast Guard must file a long range building plan. An older law says what form it takes.

What this is about

The plan looks past this year. It lists ships and bases the service means to buy. The form comes from a 2015 law.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shall notWho acts: Commandant of the Coast GuardHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds in this Act shall be used to reduce the Coast Guard's legacy Operations Systems Center mission or its government-employed or contract staff levels.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 215. Money in this Act may not be used to cut back the mission of the Coast Guard's legacy Operations Systems Center, or to cut its staffing, whether those staff are federal employees or contractors.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds in this Act shall be used to reduce the Coast Guard's legacy Operations Systems Center mission or its government-employed or contract staff levels.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

This money may not be used to shrink one Coast Guard center. Its work and its staff must stay as they are.

What this is about

The center runs computer systems for the service. The rule covers both federal staff and hired staff.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Commandant of the Coast GuardHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds appropriated by this Act may be used to conduct, or to implement the results of, a competition under Office of Management and Budget Circular A-76 for activities performed with respect to the Coast Guard National Vessel Documentation Center.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 216. Money in this Act may not be used to run, or to act on the results of, a Circular A-76 competition covering work done at the Coast Guard National Vessel Documentation Center. Circular A-76 is the budget office rule under which federal work is put up against private bidders.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds appropriated by this Act may be used to conduct, or to implement the results of, a competition under Office of Management and Budget Circular A-76 for activities performed with respect to the Coast Guard National Vessel Documentation Center.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

No money may be used to put this center's work out to bid. Nor may the result of such a bid be used.

What this is about

A federal job may be tested against private firms. That test is called an A-76 study. It may not be run here.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Commandant of the Coast GuardHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“none of the funds provided in this Act may be used to reduce operations within any civil engineering unit unless specifically authorized by a statute enacted after the date of enactment of this Act.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 217. The section allows funds to be used to alter operations within the Coast Guard's civil engineering program nationwide, including its units, design and construction centers, logistics commands and the Coast Guard Academy, but bars any reduction of operations within a civil engineering unit unless a statute passed after this Act specifically allows it.

What the document actually says

“none of the funds provided in this Act may be used to reduce operations within any civil engineering unit unless specifically authorized by a statute enacted after the date of enactment of this Act.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

This money may not be used to cut work at a building unit. Only a new law could allow that.

What this is about

These units design and build for the Coast Guard. Work may be shifted around. It may not be cut back.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Commandant of the Coast GuardHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Amounts deposited into the Coast Guard Housing Fund in fiscal year 2026 shall be available until expended to carry out the purposes of section 2946 of title 14, United States Code, and shall be in addition to funds otherwise available for such purposes.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 218. Money paid into the Coast Guard Housing Fund during fiscal year 2026 does not lapse at the end of the year. It stays available until spent for the purposes of section 2946 of title 14, and is on top of other money available for those purposes.

What the document actually says

“Amounts deposited into the Coast Guard Housing Fund in fiscal year 2026 shall be available until expended to carry out the purposes of section 2946 of title 14, United States Code, and shall be in addition to funds otherwise available for such purposes.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Money put into the housing fund this year stays until it is used. It adds to other housing money.

What this is about

The Coast Guard houses crews in remote places. This fund pays for that. Building takes more than one year.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Commandant of the Coast GuardHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“$98,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2030, for the procurement and acquisition of MQ-9 aircraft and associated base stations, equipment related to such aircraft and associated base stations, and program management for such aircraft and base stations.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 219(a). A further $98,000,000 is appropriated to the Coast Guard's procurement account, available through September 30, 2030, for buying MQ-9 aircraft and their base stations, the equipment that goes with them, and program management for both.

What the document actually says

“$98,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2030, for the procurement and acquisition of MQ-9 aircraft and associated base stations, equipment related to such aircraft and associated base stations, and program management for such aircraft and base stations.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The Coast Guard gets $98,000,000 more. It buys MQ-9 aircraft and their ground stations.

What this is about

An MQ-9 is a large drone. It flies long patrols with no crew on board. The money may be held until 2030.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds made available for the Department of Homeland Security in this or any prior Act may be used to procure or acquire long-range unmanned aircraft with kinetic capabilities or to equip any long-range unmanned aircraft with kinetic capabilities.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 219(b). No money for the department, in this Act or any earlier one, may be used to buy a long-range unmanned aircraft with kinetic capabilities, or to add kinetic capabilities to one it already has.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds made available for the Department of Homeland Security in this or any prior Act may be used to procure or acquire long-range unmanned aircraft with kinetic capabilities or to equip any long-range unmanned aircraft with kinetic capabilities.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

No money may buy a long range drone that can strike. No money may add that power to one.

What this is about

The word kinetic means it can hit a target. The Coast Guard drones bought here watch and report. This rule covers the whole department.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Commandant of the Coast GuardHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds made available to the United States Coast Guard by this Act may be available for implementation of Force Design 2028 until the Coast Guard provides the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate detailed briefings on the initiatives of organization, people, technology, and contracting and acquisitions.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 220. Coast Guard money in this Act may not be used to carry out Force Design 2028 until the service has given both Appropriations Committees detailed briefings on four sets of initiatives: organization, people, technology, and contracting and acquisitions.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds made available to the United States Coast Guard by this Act may be available for implementation of Force Design 2028 until the Coast Guard provides the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate detailed briefings on the initiatives of organization, people, technology, and contracting and acquisitions.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

No money may go to a plan called Force Design 2028 yet. The Coast Guard must brief Congress on four things first.

What this is about

Force Design 2028 is the service's own reshaping plan. This law does not say what is in it. It holds the money until the briefings happen.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Director of the United States Secret ServiceHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds made available to the United States Secret Service by this Act or by previous appropriations Acts may be made available for the protection of the head of a Federal agency other than the Secretary of Homeland Security.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 222(a). Secret Service money, from this Act or an earlier one, may not be used to protect the head of a federal agency other than the Secretary of Homeland Security. Subsection (b) allows the Director to agree to provide such protection where the cost is fully reimbursed.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds made available to the United States Secret Service by this Act or by previous appropriations Acts may be made available for the protection of the head of a Federal agency other than the Secretary of Homeland Security.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Secret Service money may not guard other agency heads. The one exception is the head of this one.

What this is about

Another agency may still ask for guards. But it has to pay the full cost back. Then the work may go ahead.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Director of the United States Secret ServiceHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Of the amounts made available by this Act under the heading ``United States Secret Service--Operations and Support'', $2,000,000, to remain available until expended, shall be distributed as a grant or cooperative agreement for existing National Computer Forensics Institute facilities”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 225. Of the Secret Service's operations money, $2,000,000 is to go out as a grant or cooperative agreement for existing National Computer Forensics Institute facilities used by the service to carry out activities under section 383 of title 6. The money stays available until spent.

What the document actually says

“Of the amounts made available by this Act under the heading ``United States Secret Service--Operations and Support'', $2,000,000, to remain available until expended, shall be distributed as a grant or cooperative agreement for existing National Computer Forensics Institute facilities”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Of the Secret Service money, $2,000,000 goes out as a grant. It supports a computer crime training site.

What this is about

The institute trains state and local police in digital evidence. The grant is for sites that already exist. The money has no end date.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “is amendedWho acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Section 118 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2001 (5 U.S.C. 5547 note) is amended, in the first sentence, by inserting ``(or, for 2024, to the extent that such aggregate amount would exceed the per annum rate of salary payable under section 104 of title 3, United States Code)'' before the period at the end.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 226(a). A textual amendment inserting a parenthetical into the first sentence of section 118 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2001. Subsection (b) makes the amendment take effect as if enacted on December 31, 2023. What the amended provision says is in that older act, which is not indexed here.

What the document actually says

“Section 118 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2001 (5 U.S.C. 5547 note) is amended, in the first sentence, by inserting ``(or, for 2024, to the extent that such aggregate amount would exceed the per annum rate of salary payable under section 104 of title 3, United States Code)'' before the period at the end.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Words are added to one sentence of a 2001 law. They set a different pay measure for the year 2024.

What this is about

The added words point to the pay rate of the President. The old law is not indexed here. So this site does not say what it holds.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Director of the United States Secret ServiceHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter through 2028, the Director shall submit to the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 226(c). Within 180 days of enactment, and each year through 2028, the Director must report to the Appropriations, Homeland Security, Oversight and Judiciary committees of both chambers on the steps the Secret Service is taking to address increased protective service demands on its personnel. Subsection (d) requires each report to analyze current operational demands and staffing levels and to recommend ways of reducing overtime, including hiring more people and redistributing workload.

What the document actually says

“Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter through 2028, the Director shall submit to the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Within 180 days the Director must report to Congress. The report is due again each year through 2028.

What this is about

The report looks at how much work agents carry. It must suggest ways to cut long hours. Hiring more people is one option it names.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border ProtectionHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds made available in this Act for U.S. Customs and Border Protection may be used to prevent an individual not in the business of importing a prescription drug (within the meaning of section 801(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) from importing a prescription drug from Canada that complies with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 227. Border agency money may not be used to stop a person who is not in the importing business from bringing in a prescription drug from Canada that complies with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Provisos limit this to drugs carried on the person, in a quantity of not more than a 90-day supply, and exclude controlled substances and biological products.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds made available in this Act for U.S. Customs and Border Protection may be used to prevent an individual not in the business of importing a prescription drug (within the meaning of section 801(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) from importing a prescription drug from Canada that complies with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The border agency may not stop a traveler with medicine from Canada. The drug must meet our own drug law.

What this is about

The rule covers what a person carries on them. It is capped at a 90 day supply. It does not cover controlled drugs.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border ProtectionHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“shall be available for customs expenses when necessary to maintain operations and prevent adverse personnel actions in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, in addition to funding provided by sections 740 and 1406i of title 48, United States Code.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 228. The border agency's operations and procurement money is available for customs expenses in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands where that is needed to keep operations running and to prevent adverse personnel actions. The section says this funding is in addition to that provided by sections 740 and 1406i of title 48.

What the document actually says

“shall be available for customs expenses when necessary to maintain operations and prevent adverse personnel actions in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, in addition to funding provided by sections 740 and 1406i of title 48, United States Code.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Border agency money may pay for customs work in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. That keeps the work going and staff in place.

What this is about

Those islands fund some customs work from their own accounts. When that falls short, this money may fill the gap.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border ProtectionHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For an additional amount for ``U.S. Customs and Border Protection--Operations and Support'', $31,000,000, to remain available until expended, to be reduced by amounts collected and credited to this appropriation in fiscal year 2026”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 229(a). A further $31,000,000 is appropriated to the border agency's operations account, available until spent, and reduced dollar for dollar by fees collected during fiscal year 2026 under the immigration user fee, agricultural quarantine inspection and customs authorities the section names. Subsection (b) credits collections above $31,000,000 to the same account, available until spent.

What the document actually says

“For an additional amount for ``U.S. Customs and Border Protection--Operations and Support'', $31,000,000, to remain available until expended, to be reduced by amounts collected and credited to this appropriation in fiscal year 2026”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The border agency gets $31,000,000 more. That sum drops as fee money comes in.

What this is about

The fees come from travelers and from farm goods checks. If more comes in than $31,000,000, the extra stays in the account.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency for operations and support, $2,218,634,000”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The operations and support appropriation for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. The account paragraph directs the money to the purposes and amounts specified in the Final Bill column of a table in the explanatory statement described in section 4, and keeps the amounts for the National Infrastructure Simulation Analysis Center available through September 30, 2027.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency for operations and support, $2,218,634,000”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The cyber agency gets $2,218,634,000 to run on for the year.

What this is about

This agency guards federal networks. It also helps states and firms guard theirs. A table in a report splits the money up.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency for procurement, construction, and improvements, $386,464,000, to remain available until September 30, 2028.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The procurement, construction and improvements appropriation for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. The whole of it stays available through September 30, 2028.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency for procurement, construction, and improvements, $386,464,000, to remain available until September 30, 2028.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The cyber agency gets $386,464,000 to build and to buy. It may spend it up to September 30, 2028.

What this is about

This buys tools and systems, not staff time. Such work runs past one year.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for operations and support, $1,667,038,000: Provided, That not less than $3,000,000 shall be for the Emergency Management Assistance Compact”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The operations and support appropriation for the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Of the total, not less than $3,000,000 is directed to the Emergency Management Assistance Compact, the agreement under which states send help to one another during a disaster.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for operations and support, $1,667,038,000: Provided, That not less than $3,000,000 shall be for the Emergency Management Assistance Compact”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

FEMA gets $1,667,038,000 to run on. At least $3,000,000 goes to a state aid compact.

What this is about

FEMA helps after floods, fires and storms. This money pays its staff. The compact lets states lend each other crews.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for procurement, construction, and improvements, $156,419,000, of which $92,794,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2028, and of which $63,625,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2030.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The procurement, construction and improvements appropriation for the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Of the total, $92,794,000 stays available through September 30, 2028, and $63,625,000 through September 30, 2030.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for procurement, construction, and improvements, $156,419,000, of which $92,794,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2028, and of which $63,625,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2030.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

FEMA gets $156,419,000 to build and to buy. Part of it may be held until 2030.

What this is about

This pays for gear and for work on its sites. Longer jobs get the money that lasts longer.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For activities of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for Federal assistance through grants, contracts, cooperative agreements, and other activities, $3,836,748,513, which shall be allocated as follows”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The federal assistance account, the account that carries FEMA's grant programs. The fourteen numbered paragraphs that follow allocate the whole sum in the Act's own text rather than by reference to a table, and each of those paragraphs is recorded separately here.

What the document actually says

“For activities of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for Federal assistance through grants, contracts, cooperative agreements, and other activities, $3,836,748,513, which shall be allocated as follows”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

FEMA gets $3,836,748,513 for grants and like work. The law then splits that sum up.

What this is about

A grant is money passed on to someone else. Here it goes to states, cities and groups. The next fourteen lines say how much each part gets.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“$494,000,000 for the State Homeland Security Grant Program under section 2004 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 605), of which $85,500,000 shall be for Operation Stonegarden and $14,250,000 shall be for Tribal Homeland Security Grants”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The first allocation from the federal assistance account. Of the $494,000,000, $85,500,000 is for Operation Stonegarden, which funds state and local law enforcement work with the border agency, and $14,250,000 is for Tribal Homeland Security Grants under section 2005 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002. A proviso requires Puerto Rico to pass its share through to local and tribal governments in fiscal year 2026.

What the document actually says

“$494,000,000 for the State Homeland Security Grant Program under section 2004 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 605), of which $85,500,000 shall be for Operation Stonegarden and $14,250,000 shall be for Tribal Homeland Security Grants”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

States share $494,000,000 in security grants. Of that, $85,500,000 goes to border work. Tribes get $14,250,000.

What this is about

The grants pay for gear, training and planning. Border work here means local police helping at the border. Puerto Rico must pass its share to towns.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“$584,250,000 for the Urban Area Security Initiative under section 2003 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 604).”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The second allocation from the federal assistance account. It funds the Urban Area Security Initiative, the grant program under section 2003 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 for urban areas the department treats as high risk.

What the document actually says

“$584,250,000 for the Urban Area Security Initiative under section 2003 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 604).”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Big city areas share $584,250,000. The grants pay for safety work.

What this is about

The money goes to areas seen as most at risk. Which areas those are is not set here. The department picks them.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“$300,000,000 for the Nonprofit Security Grant Program under section 2009 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 609a), of which $150,000,000 is for eligible recipients located in high-risk urban areas”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The third allocation from the federal assistance account. The $300,000,000 is split evenly: $150,000,000 for eligible recipients inside the high-risk urban areas funded under section 2003, and $150,000,000 for those outside them. A proviso makes eligible recipients those described in section 2009(b) or otherwise eligible recipients at risk of a terrorist or other extremist attack.

What the document actually says

“$300,000,000 for the Nonprofit Security Grant Program under section 2009 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 609a), of which $150,000,000 is for eligible recipients located in high-risk urban areas”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Nonprofit groups share $300,000,000 for security. Half of it goes to groups in big city areas.

What this is about

The money helps guard places of worship and like sites. The other half goes to groups outside those areas. A group must be at risk of attack.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“$99,750,000 for Public Transportation Security Assistance, Railroad Security Assistance, and Over-the-Road Bus Security Assistance under sections 1406, 1513, and 1532 of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The fourth allocation from the federal assistance account. Of the $99,750,000, $9,500,000 is for Amtrak security and $1,900,000 for over-the-road bus security. A proviso requires the public transportation share to be provided directly to public transportation agencies.

What the document actually says

“$99,750,000 for Public Transportation Security Assistance, Railroad Security Assistance, and Over-the-Road Bus Security Assistance under sections 1406, 1513, and 1532 of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Transit, rail and bus security share $99,750,000. The money comes from three grant programs.

What this is about

Of that, $9,500,000 is for Amtrak. Bus lines get $1,900,000. Transit money must go straight to the transit agency.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“$95,000,000 for Port Security Grants in accordance with section 70107 of title 46, United States Code.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The fifth allocation from the federal assistance account. It funds port security grants under section 70107 of title 46.

What the document actually says

“$95,000,000 for Port Security Grants in accordance with section 70107 of title 46, United States Code.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Ports share $95,000,000 in security grants.

What this is about

Ports move most goods coming in and out. The grants help guard docks and cargo.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“$684,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2027, of which $342,000,000 shall be for Assistance to Firefighter Grants and $342,000,000 shall be for Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Grants”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The sixth allocation from the federal assistance account. It stays available through September 30, 2027, and is split evenly between the two firefighter grant programs under sections 33 and 34 of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974: Assistance to Firefighter Grants, which pays for equipment, and Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Grants, which pays for firefighters.

What the document actually says

“$684,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2027, of which $342,000,000 shall be for Assistance to Firefighter Grants and $342,000,000 shall be for Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Grants”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Fire grants get $684,000,000. Half buys gear. Half pays for firefighters.

What this is about

One program buys trucks, hoses and air packs. The other helps a town hire crews. The money lasts two years.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“$337,250,000 for emergency management performance grants under the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.)”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The seventh allocation from the federal assistance account. The paragraph lists five authorities for these grants, among them the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act and the Earthquake Hazards Reduction Act of 1977.

What the document actually says

“$337,250,000 for emergency management performance grants under the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.)”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

State and local offices share $337,250,000. These are the offices that plan for disasters.

What this is about

These grants pay for the people who plan for disasters. Every state has such an office. The money helps keep it staffed.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“$297,113,000 for necessary expenses for Flood Hazard Mapping and Risk Analysis, in addition to and to supplement any other sums appropriated under the National Flood Insurance Fund”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The eighth allocation from the federal assistance account. It funds flood hazard mapping and risk analysis, adds to whatever is available under the National Flood Insurance Fund, may be added to by state and local contributions for cost-shared mapping, and stays available until spent.

What the document actually says

“$297,113,000 for necessary expenses for Flood Hazard Mapping and Risk Analysis, in addition to and to supplement any other sums appropriated under the National Flood Insurance Fund”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Flood maps get $297,113,000. That is on top of money from the flood insurance fund.

What this is about

A flood map shows which land floods. It sets who must buy flood cover. States may chip in to help map their own land.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“(9) $11,400,000 for Regional Catastrophic Preparedness Grants. (10) $11,400,000 for Rehabilitation of High Hazard Potential Dams under section 8A of the National Dam Safety Program Act (33 U.S.C. 467f-2).”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The ninth and tenth allocations from the federal assistance account, each of $11,400,000. The first funds regional catastrophic preparedness grants. The second funds the rehabilitation of high hazard potential dams under section 8A of the National Dam Safety Program Act.

What the document actually says

“(9) $11,400,000 for Regional Catastrophic Preparedness Grants. (10) $11,400,000 for Rehabilitation of High Hazard Potential Dams under section 8A of the National Dam Safety Program Act (33 U.S.C. 467f-2).”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Regional disaster planning gets $11,400,000. Repair of risky dams gets the same sum.

What this is about

A high hazard dam is one that would kill people if it broke. This helps fix them. The planning grants cover whole regions.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“$123,500,000 for the emergency food and shelter program under title III of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11331), to remain available until September 30, 2027”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The eleventh allocation from the federal assistance account. It funds the emergency food and shelter program under title III of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act, stays available through September 30, 2027, and caps total administrative costs at 3.5 percent.

What the document actually says

“$123,500,000 for the emergency food and shelter program under title III of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11331), to remain available until September 30, 2027”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Food and shelter aid gets $123,500,000. The money lasts until September 30, 2027.

What this is about

The program pays for meals and beds for people in need. Local groups hand it out. Only 3.5 percent may go to running costs.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“$48,000,000 for the Next Generation Warning System.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The twelfth allocation from the federal assistance account. It funds the Next Generation Warning System. The Act names the sum and the program and says nothing further about it.

What the document actually says

“$48,000,000 for the Next Generation Warning System.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

A warning system gets $48,000,000.

What this is about

This is how alerts reach the public in a disaster. The law names the sum and the program. It says nothing else here.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“$272,671,513 for Community Project Funding and Congressionally Directed Spending grants, which shall be for the purposes, and the amounts, specified in the table entitled ``Homeland Security--Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending''”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The thirteenth allocation from the federal assistance account. The purposes and amounts are set by a named table in the explanatory statement described in section 4. Of the total, $82,957,854 is for emergency operations center grants under section 614 of the Stafford Act, and $189,713,659 is for pre-disaster mitigation grants under section 203 of that Act, each in addition to other money for the same purpose.

What the document actually says

“$272,671,513 for Community Project Funding and Congressionally Directed Spending grants, which shall be for the purposes, and the amounts, specified in the table entitled ``Homeland Security--Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending''”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Projects named by members of Congress get $272,671,513. A table in a report lists them.

What this is about

These grants go to places a member asked for. Most fund two things. One is local command centers. The other is work to cut future storm damage.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“$478,414,000 to sustain current operations for training, exercises, technical assistance, and other programs”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The fourteenth and last allocation from the federal assistance account. The paragraph splits it ten ways, among them $85,711,000 for the Center for Domestic Preparedness, $95,950,000 for the National Domestic Preparedness Consortium, $83,657,000 for the Biological Support Program, $72,140,000 for the United States Fire Administration, $34,465,000 for Securing the Cities and $21,266,000 for the National Exercise Program.

What the document actually says

“$478,414,000 to sustain current operations for training, exercises, technical assistance, and other programs”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Training and drills get $478,414,000. That keeps current work going.

What this is about

The money is split ten ways. It funds schools for first responders. It also pays for large practice drills.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses in carrying out the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), $26,367,000,000, to remain available until expended”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The Disaster Relief Fund, the largest single appropriation in the Act. The money stays available until spent. A proviso limits it to major disasters declared under the Stafford Act and designates it by the Congress as being for disaster relief pursuant to a concurrent resolution on the budget.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses in carrying out the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), $26,367,000,000, to remain available until expended”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The disaster fund gets $26,367,000,000. The money stays until it is used.

What this is about

This is the biggest sum in the law. It pays for help after a major disaster. The President must declare one first.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For activities under the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.), the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.), the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 (Public Law 112-141, 126 Stat. 916), and the Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-89; 128 Stat. 1020), $226,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2027”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The National Flood Insurance Fund appropriation. The whole of it is derived from premium fees collected under section 1308(d) of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 rather than from the general fund. Of the total, $16,302,000 is for mission support and $209,698,000 for flood plain management and flood mapping. Further provisos cap what may be drawn from the fund during the year, including $1,505,000,000 for commissions and taxes of agents and $175,000,000 for flood mitigation, and cap total administrative costs at 4 percent.

What the document actually says

“For activities under the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.), the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.), the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 (Public Law 112-141, 126 Stat. 916), and the Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-89; 128 Stat. 1020), $226,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2027”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Flood insurance work gets $226,000,000. The money lasts until September 30, 2027.

What this is about

The money comes from what policy holders pay, not from taxes. Most of it maps flood risk. Caps limit what else may be drawn from the fund.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “canWho acts: Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Funds made available under the heading ``Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency--Operations and Support'' may be made available for the necessary expenses of procuring or providing access to cybersecurity threat feeds”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 301. The cyber agency's operations money may be used to buy, or to provide access to, cybersecurity threat feeds for federal bodies, for state, local, tribal and territorial entities, for fusion centers as described in section 210A of the Homeland Security Act, and for Information Sharing and Analysis Organizations.

What the document actually says

“Funds made available under the heading ``Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency--Operations and Support'' may be made available for the necessary expenses of procuring or providing access to cybersecurity threat feeds”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The cyber agency may buy threat feeds. It may also give others access to them.

What this is about

A threat feed is a live list of known attacks. States and firms use it to block them. This lets one agency buy it for many.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “canWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“not more than 5 percent of the amount of a grant made available in paragraphs (1) through (5) under ``Federal Emergency Management Agency--Federal Assistance'', may be used by the recipient for expenses directly related to administration of the grant.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 302(a). For the first five grant allocations in the federal assistance account, a recipient may spend at most 5 percent of the grant on the cost of administering it. The subsection applies notwithstanding section 2008(a)(12) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002. Subsection (b) extends the same authority to a state recipient administering a nonprofit security grant.

What the document actually says

“not more than 5 percent of the amount of a grant made available in paragraphs (1) through (5) under ``Federal Emergency Management Agency--Federal Assistance'', may be used by the recipient for expenses directly related to administration of the grant.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

A grant winner may spend up to 5 percent on running the grant. No more than that.

What this is about

Paperwork and staff time cost money. This caps that share. The rest must go to the work itself.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Applications for grants under the heading ``Federal Emergency Management Agency--Federal Assistance'', for paragraphs (1) through (5), shall be made available to eligible applicants not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, eligible applicants shall submit applications not later than 80 days after the grant announcement, and the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall act within 65 days after the receipt of an application.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 303(a). For the first five grant allocations in the federal assistance account, applications must be made available to eligible applicants within 60 days of enactment, applicants have 80 days from the announcement to apply, and the Administrator must act within 65 days of receiving an application.

What the document actually says

“Applications for grants under the heading ``Federal Emergency Management Agency--Federal Assistance'', for paragraphs (1) through (5), shall be made available to eligible applicants not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, eligible applicants shall submit applications not later than 80 days after the grant announcement, and the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall act within 65 days after the receipt of an application.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Grant forms must go out within 60 days. Applicants then have 80 days to apply. FEMA must decide within 65 days.

What this is about

Grant money can sit for months before it moves. These are hard dates for each step. They cover the five biggest grant lines.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“shall be reduced by $100,000 for each day past the 60-day requirement that applications are not made available to eligible applicants as required in subsection (a)”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 303(b). If the applications are not made available within the 60 days set by subsection (a), the money appropriated by this Act for FEMA's operations and support is cut by $100,000 for each day of delay, and the mission support amount specified for that heading in the explanatory statement table is cut by the same amount.

What the document actually says

“shall be reduced by $100,000 for each day past the 60-day requirement that applications are not made available to eligible applicants as required in subsection (a)”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

If the forms go out late, FEMA loses $100,000 a day. The clock starts after 60 days.

What this is about

The cut hits the agency's own running money. It does not hit the grants. It is meant to make the deadline bite.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall brief the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate five full business days in advance of announcing publicly the intention of making an award.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 304(a). For grants under most of the allocations in the federal assistance account, the Administrator must brief both Appropriations Committees five full business days before publicly announcing an intended award. Subsection (b) rescinds $1,000,000 of FEMA operations money, and cuts the mission support amount in the explanatory statement table by the same sum, if an announcement is made early.

What the document actually says

“the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall brief the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate five full business days in advance of announcing publicly the intention of making an award.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

FEMA must brief Congress before it names a grant winner. The briefing comes five work days ahead.

What this is about

If the news goes out early, the agency loses $1,000,000. That comes from its own running money.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “meansWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“for grants under paragraphs (1) and (2), the installation of communications towers is not considered construction of a building or other physical facility.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 305. For the state homeland security and urban area grants, putting up a communications tower does not count as constructing a building or other physical facility. Grant rules elsewhere restrict how much grant money may go to construction, and this section places towers outside that category.

What the document actually says

“for grants under paragraphs (1) and (2), the installation of communications towers is not considered construction of a building or other physical facility.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

For two grant lines, a radio tower does not count as a building.

What this is about

Grant rules limit how much may go to building work. A tower is not counted that way. So it may be paid for.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “canWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency may grant waivers from the requirements in subsections (a)(1)(A), (a)(1)(B), (a)(1)(E), (c)(1), (c)(2), and (c)(4) of section 34 of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 (15 U.S.C. 2229a).”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 307. In making Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response grants, the Administrator may waive six named requirements in section 34 of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974. What those requirements say is in that older act, which is not indexed here. Section 309 gives a similar waiver power over subsection (k) of section 33 for the equipment grants.

What the document actually says

“the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency may grant waivers from the requirements in subsections (a)(1)(A), (a)(1)(B), (a)(1)(E), (c)(1), (c)(2), and (c)(4) of section 34 of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 (15 U.S.C. 2229a).”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

FEMA may set aside six rules for firefighter staffing grants. The rules sit in an older law.

What this is about

Those rules limit who may get a grant. The older law is not indexed here. So this site does not say what they hold.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Each award for grants under the heading ``Federal Emergency Management Agency--Federal Assistance'' for paragraphs (1) through (10) and (12), shall have a period of performance, as defined by 2 CFR 200.1, that shall be of not less than three years and not more than five years.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 312. For eleven of the fourteen allocations in the federal assistance account, each award must carry a period of performance, as that term is defined in the federal grant regulations at 2 CFR 200.1, of at least three years and at most five.

What the document actually says

“Each award for grants under the heading ``Federal Emergency Management Agency--Federal Assistance'' for paragraphs (1) through (10) and (12), shall have a period of performance, as defined by 2 CFR 200.1, that shall be of not less than three years and not more than five years.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Each of these grants must run at least three years. None may run more than five.

What this is about

The period of performance is the window to spend. A short window pushes money out fast. This sets a floor and a ceiling.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall post an interactive dashboard on the public-facing website of the Federal Emergency Management Agency with any request for reimbursement for a covered expense, delineated by state”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 313(a). FEMA must publish an interactive dashboard on its public website showing requests for reimbursement of covered expenses, broken out by state and by whether the amount is individual assistance or public assistance under an emergency or major disaster declaration. A request must appear within 90 days of the agency receiving it and within 60 days of the department putting it under final review. Subsection (b) sets the minimum contents by reference to a paragraph in the explanatory statement.

What the document actually says

“The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall post an interactive dashboard on the public-facing website of the Federal Emergency Management Agency with any request for reimbursement for a covered expense, delineated by state”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

FEMA must put a live chart on its website. It shows who has asked to be paid back, state by state.

What this is about

After a disaster, states ask FEMA to pay them back. This shows those asks in the open. Each one must appear within 90 days.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds appropriated in this Act may be used to pause a training or grant funded under the heading ``Federal Emergency Management Agency--Federal Assistance''.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 314(a). Money in this Act may not be used to pause a training course or a grant funded from FEMA's federal assistance account. Subsection (b) lifts the bar where the Secretary notifies both Appropriations Committees at least 10 business days in advance, subsection (c) sets what that notice must explain, and subsection (d) allows the Secretary to waive the notice in extraordinary circumstances that imminently threaten life or property.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds appropriated in this Act may be used to pause a training or grant funded under the heading ``Federal Emergency Management Agency--Federal Assistance''.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

This money may not be used to pause a FEMA class or grant.

What this is about

A pause may still happen. But Congress must be told 10 work days ahead. The notice must say why and what it costs.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration ServicesHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services for operations and support, including for the E-Verify Program, $122,941,000”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The appropriation for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the agency that decides applications for visas, green cards, asylum and citizenship. The account paragraph names the E-Verify program as an included expense. The sum is small next to the other operating agencies in this Act, and a proviso in the same account paragraph provides that it requires no reduction in the fees the agency charges applicants.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services for operations and support, including for the E-Verify Program, $122,941,000”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

This agency gets $122,941,000 to run on. Part of it runs E-Verify.

What this is about

The agency decides who may live and work here. Most of its money comes from fees, not from this law. E-Verify checks if a new hire may work.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may not be construedWho acts: Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration ServicesHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“such amounts shall be in addition to any other amounts made available for such purposes, and shall not be construed to require any reduction of any fee described in section 286(m) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1356(m))”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

A proviso on the same account. The appropriated money is additional to whatever else is available for these purposes, and receiving it does not require the agency to lower any of the fees described in section 286(m) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

What the document actually says

“such amounts shall be in addition to any other amounts made available for such purposes, and shall not be construed to require any reduction of any fee described in section 286(m) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1356(m))”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

This money adds to what the agency already has. It does not force any fee to drop.

What this is about

The agency charges fees to file a form. Getting money here does not change those fees. The two are kept apart.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Director of the Federal Law Enforcement Training CentersHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers for operations and support, including the purchase of not to exceed 117 vehicles for police-type use and hire of passenger motor vehicles, and services as authorized by section 3109 of title 5, United States Code, $379,837,000, of which $75,551,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2027”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The operations and support appropriation for the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers, which train officers and agents for agencies across the federal government. The account paragraph allows the purchase of up to 117 police-type vehicles, and $75,551,000 of the total stays available through September 30, 2027.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers for operations and support, including the purchase of not to exceed 117 vehicles for police-type use and hire of passenger motor vehicles, and services as authorized by section 3109 of title 5, United States Code, $379,837,000, of which $75,551,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2027”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The training centers get $379,837,000. They may buy up to 117 police cars. Some money lasts into 2027.

What this is about

New federal officers train here before they start. Many agencies send people. The cars are used in that training.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Director of the Federal Law Enforcement Training CentersHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers for procurement, construction, and improvements, $18,300,000, to remain available until September 30, 2030”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The procurement, construction and improvements appropriation for the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers. It stays available through September 30, 2030, and covers acquiring more real property and facilities, construction, ongoing maintenance and facility improvements.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers for procurement, construction, and improvements, $18,300,000, to remain available until September 30, 2030”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The training centers get $18,300,000 to build. They may spend it up to September 30, 2030.

What this is about

This buys land and puts up ranges and halls. It also keeps the old ones up. Such work runs for years.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Under Secretary for Science and TechnologyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of the Science and Technology Directorate for operations and support, including the purchase or lease of not to exceed 5 vehicles, $352,802,000, of which $201,183,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2027”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The operations and support appropriation for the Science and Technology Directorate, the department's research arm. Of the total, $201,183,000 stays available through September 30, 2027.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of the Science and Technology Directorate for operations and support, including the purchase or lease of not to exceed 5 vehicles, $352,802,000, of which $201,183,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2027”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The science arm gets $352,802,000 to run on. Of that, $201,183,000 lasts into 2027.

What this is about

This part tests tools and runs labs for the rest of the department. The money pays its staff and its lab costs.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Under Secretary for Science and TechnologyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of the Science and Technology Directorate for procurement, construction, and improvements, $51,500,000, to remain available until September 30, 2030.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The procurement, construction and improvements appropriation for the Science and Technology Directorate. The whole of it stays available through September 30, 2030.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of the Science and Technology Directorate for procurement, construction, and improvements, $51,500,000, to remain available until September 30, 2030.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The science arm gets $51,500,000 to build and to buy. It may spend it up to September 30, 2030.

What this is about

Lab work needs special buildings. Those take years to put up. So the money is held that long.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Under Secretary for Science and TechnologyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For necessary expenses of the Science and Technology Directorate for research and development, $426,904,000, to remain available until September 30, 2028.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The research and development appropriation for the Science and Technology Directorate. It is larger than the directorate's operating account and stays available through September 30, 2028.

What the document actually says

“For necessary expenses of the Science and Technology Directorate for research and development, $426,904,000, to remain available until September 30, 2028.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Research gets $426,904,000. The money lasts until September 30, 2028.

What this is about

This is the biggest of the three science accounts. It pays for the work itself, not the staff.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration ServicesHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds appropriated by this Act may be used to process or approve a competition under Office of Management and Budget Circular A-76 for services provided by employees”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 402. Money in this Act may not be used to run or approve a Circular A-76 competition over work done by immigration service employees in five named job types: Immigration Information Officers, Immigration Service Analysts, Contact Representatives, Investigative Assistants and Immigration Services Officers. The bar covers temporary and term employees as well as permanent ones.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds appropriated by this Act may be used to process or approve a competition under Office of Management and Budget Circular A-76 for services provided by employees”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

No money may be used to put certain staff jobs out to bid.

What this is about

A federal job may be tested against private firms. Five job types are named here. They may not be tested that way.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “canWho acts: Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration ServicesHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any Federal funds made available to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services may be used for the collection and use of biometrics taken at a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Application Support Center that is overseen virtually by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services personnel using appropriate technology.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 403. Federal money available to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services may be used to collect and use biometrics taken at an Application Support Center that agency staff oversee remotely with suitable technology, rather than in person.

What the document actually says

“Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any Federal funds made available to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services may be used for the collection and use of biometrics taken at a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Application Support Center that is overseen virtually by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services personnel using appropriate technology.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The agency may take fingerprints and photos at its centers. Its staff may watch over that work from far away.

What this is about

Biometrics means fingerprints, photos and the like. They are taken at a support center. Staff need not stand in the room.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Director of the Federal Law Enforcement Training CentersHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“The functions of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers instructor staff shall be classified as inherently governmental for purposes of the Federal Activities Inventory Reform Act of 1998 (31 U.S.C. 501 note).”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 407. The work of the training centers' instructor staff is classified as inherently governmental under the Federal Activities Inventory Reform Act of 1998, the law under which agencies list which of their functions could be performed by a private contractor.

What the document actually says

“The functions of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers instructor staff shall be classified as inherently governmental for purposes of the Federal Activities Inventory Reform Act of 1998 (31 U.S.C. 501 note).”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The work of these instructors counts as government work. A 1998 law sets that class.

What this is about

Agencies list which jobs a private firm could do. Jobs in this class stay with the government. Instructor jobs are put in that class.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shall notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“No part of any appropriation contained in this Act shall remain available for obligation beyond the current fiscal year unless expressly so provided herein.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 501. The default rule for the whole of division A. An appropriation lapses at the end of fiscal year 2026 unless the Act expressly says it stays available longer. The many account paragraphs that say to remain available until a later date, or until expended, are the exceptions this section refers to.

What the document actually says

“No part of any appropriation contained in this Act shall remain available for obligation beyond the current fiscal year unless expressly so provided herein.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Money in this law runs out at the end of the year. It only lasts longer if the law says so.

What this is about

The budget year ends on September 30. What is left goes back. Many money lines here say otherwise, and those hold.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “canWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“the unexpended balances of prior appropriations provided for activities in this Act may be transferred to appropriation accounts for such activities established pursuant to this Act, may be merged with funds in the applicable established accounts, and thereafter may be accounted for as one fund for the same time period as originally enacted.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 502. Subject to the reprogramming rules in section 503, money left over from earlier appropriations for the same activities may be moved into the accounts this Act establishes, merged with what is there, and then treated as a single fund for the period the earlier act set.

What the document actually says

“the unexpended balances of prior appropriations provided for activities in this Act may be transferred to appropriation accounts for such activities established pursuant to this Act, may be merged with funds in the applicable established accounts, and thereafter may be accounted for as one fund for the same time period as originally enacted.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Money left over from older laws may be moved into these accounts. Once moved, it is treated as one pot.

What this is about

Accounts get renamed and reshaped over the years. This lets old balances follow the work. The old time limit still holds.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shall notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“shall be available for obligation or expenditure through a reprogramming of funds that-- (1) creates or eliminates a program, project, or activity, or increases funds for any program, project, or activity for which funds have been denied or restricted by the Congress”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 503(a). Money from this Act, from earlier acts still available in fiscal year 2026, or from fee accounts, may not be spent through a reprogramming that does any of five things: creates or ends a program, project or activity, or adds to one Congress denied; contracts out work now done by federal employees; adds more than $5,000,000 or 10 percent to an existing activity, whichever is less; cuts an activity or its staffing by 10 percent or more; or follows from general savings from a staffing cut.

What the document actually says

“shall be available for obligation or expenditure through a reprogramming of funds that-- (1) creates or eliminates a program, project, or activity, or increases funds for any program, project, or activity for which funds have been denied or restricted by the Congress”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

This money may not be moved around in ways that start a program. Nor may it be moved to one Congress said no to.

What this is about

Reprogramming means shifting money between uses inside an account. Five kinds of shift are barred here. The next rule tells how the bar is lifted.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shall notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Subsection (a) shall not apply if the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate are notified at least 30 days in advance of such reprogramming.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 503(b). The five bars in subsection (a) do not apply where both Appropriations Committees are notified at least 30 days before the reprogramming takes place. In practice this converts the prohibition into a notification requirement.

What the document actually says

“Subsection (a) shall not apply if the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate are notified at least 30 days in advance of such reprogramming.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The bar lifts if Congress is told 30 days ahead of the move.

What this is about

So the move is not banned outright. It is delayed and made public to the committees. They may object in that window.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “canWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Up to 5 percent of any appropriation made available for the current fiscal year for the Department of Homeland Security by this Act or provided by previous appropriations Acts may be transferred between such appropriations if the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate are notified at least 30 days in advance of such transfer”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 503(c). Up to 5 percent of any of the department's current year appropriations may be moved to another appropriation, on 30 days notice to both Appropriations Committees. No appropriation may be increased by more than 10 percent by such a transfer unless the Act specifically provides otherwise. Section 549 separately bars any transfer under this subsection to the border agency for Border Security Operations.

What the document actually says

“Up to 5 percent of any appropriation made available for the current fiscal year for the Department of Homeland Security by this Act or provided by previous appropriations Acts may be transferred between such appropriations if the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate are notified at least 30 days in advance of such transfer”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Up to 5 percent of an account may be moved to another account. Congress must be told 30 days ahead.

What this is about

This moves money between accounts, not within one. A receiving account may not grow by more than a tenth this way.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shall notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Notwithstanding subsections (a), (b), and (c), no funds shall be reprogrammed within or transferred between appropriations-- (1) based upon an initial notification provided after June 15, except in extraordinary circumstances that imminently threaten the safety of human life or the protection of property; (2) to increase or decrease funding for grant programs”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 503(d). Three outer limits that hold even where the notice requirements are met: no reprogramming on a first notification given after June 15, unless extraordinary circumstances imminently threaten life or property; none to raise or lower funding for grant programs; and none to create a program, project or activity, including a new function within one, that Congress did not approve when it passed this Act.

What the document actually says

“Notwithstanding subsections (a), (b), and (c), no funds shall be reprogrammed within or transferred between appropriations-- (1) based upon an initial notification provided after June 15, except in extraordinary circumstances that imminently threaten the safety of human life or the protection of property; (2) to increase or decrease funding for grant programs”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

No money may be shifted on a notice sent after June 15. None may be shifted to change grant funding.

What this is about

These limits hold even with notice. The date rule keeps late year shifts from slipping through. Grant money is fenced off.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“not to exceed 50 percent of unobligated balances remaining available at the end of fiscal year 2026, as recorded in the financial records at the time of a reprogramming notification, but not later than June 15, 2027, from appropriations for ``Operations and Support'' for fiscal year 2026 in this Act shall remain available through September 30, 2027”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 505(a). Up to half of what is left unobligated in an operations and support account at the end of fiscal year 2026 stays available through September 30, 2027, in the same account and for the same purposes. Subsection (b) requires a notification to both Appropriations Committees under section 503 before that money is committed.

What the document actually says

“not to exceed 50 percent of unobligated balances remaining available at the end of fiscal year 2026, as recorded in the financial records at the time of a reprogramming notification, but not later than June 15, 2027, from appropriations for ``Operations and Support'' for fiscal year 2026 in this Act shall remain available through September 30, 2027”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Up to half of unspent running money may be kept. It lasts one more year. It stays in the same account.

What this is about

Without this, the whole balance would go back. Keeping some removes the rush to spend by September 30. Congress must be told first.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Funds made available by this Act for intelligence activities are deemed to be specifically authorized by the Congress for purposes of section 504 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 414) during fiscal year 2026 until the enactment of an Act authorizing intelligence activities for fiscal year 2026.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 506(a). Money in this Act for intelligence activities counts as specifically authorized by Congress under section 504 of the National Security Act of 1947, until a fiscal year 2026 intelligence authorization act is passed. Subsection (b) requires amounts above the level in that authorization to be moved into the Management Directorate account, and subsection (c) requires a briefing before any transferred money is committed.

What the document actually says

“Funds made available by this Act for intelligence activities are deemed to be specifically authorized by the Congress for purposes of section 504 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 414) during fiscal year 2026 until the enactment of an Act authorizing intelligence activities for fiscal year 2026.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Money here for intelligence work counts as approved by Congress. That holds until a separate law is passed.

What this is about

Spy work normally needs its own yearly law. That law had not passed. This fills the gap for the year.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“The Secretary of Homeland Security, or the designee of the Secretary, shall notify the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate at least three full business days in advance of-- (1) making or awarding a grant allocation or grant in excess of $1,000,000 or a grant made from the Disaster Relief Fund in excess of $100,000”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 507(a). The Secretary must give both Appropriations Committees three full business days notice before making a grant over $1,000,000, a disaster fund grant over $100,000, a contract or task order over $2,000,000, a task order drawing more than $5,000,000 from multi-year funds, or a sole-source grant, and before announcing any of them publicly. Subsection (b) allows an award without notice where compliance would pose a substantial risk to life, health or safety, with notice within three days after. Subsection (c) sets what each notice must contain.

What the document actually says

“The Secretary of Homeland Security, or the designee of the Secretary, shall notify the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate at least three full business days in advance of-- (1) making or awarding a grant allocation or grant in excess of $1,000,000 or a grant made from the Disaster Relief Fund in excess of $100,000”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Before a large grant or contract goes out, the Secretary must tell Congress. The notice comes three work days ahead.

What this is about

The limits differ by award type. Disaster grants have the lowest one. Notice may be skipped if lives are at risk.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shall notWho acts: heads of Federal agenciesHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no agency shall purchase, construct, or lease any additional facilities, except within or contiguous to existing locations, to be used for the purpose of conducting Federal law enforcement training without advance notification to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 508. No agency may buy, build or lease an additional facility for federal law enforcement training, other than at or next to an existing site, without first notifying both Appropriations Committees. The training centers may still obtain temporary use of extra facilities by lease, contract or other agreement for training that will not fit in their existing space.

What the document actually says

“Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no agency shall purchase, construct, or lease any additional facilities, except within or contiguous to existing locations, to be used for the purpose of conducting Federal law enforcement training without advance notification to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

No agency may buy or build a new training site without telling Congress first. Sites next to old ones are exempt.

What this is about

The rule covers all agencies, not just this one. Short term rented space is still allowed. That covers overflow classes.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used for expenses for any construction, repair, alteration, or acquisition project for which a prospectus otherwise required under chapter 33 of title 40, United States Code, has not been approved”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 509. Money in this Act may not be spent on a construction, repair, alteration or acquisition project whose prospectus, where chapter 33 of title 40 requires one, has not been approved. The section allows the necessary money to be spent on developing a proposed prospectus for each such project.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used for expenses for any construction, repair, alteration, or acquisition project for which a prospectus otherwise required under chapter 33 of title 40, United States Code, has not been approved”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

No money may go to a building project that lacks an approved plan. Work on the plan itself is allowed.

What this is about

A prospectus sets out a project and its cost. Congress approves it. Only then may the work be paid for.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds made available in this Act may be used in contravention of the applicable provisions of the Buy American Act.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 511. Money in this Act may not be spent contrary to the applicable provisions of the Buy American Act, which subsection (b) defines for this purpose as chapter 83 of title 41.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds made available in this Act may be used in contravention of the applicable provisions of the Buy American Act.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

No money here may be spent against the Buy American Act.

What this is about

That law tells agencies to buy American made goods. This ties the money in this law to it. The law itself is not indexed here.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration ServicesHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds made available in this Act may be used to amend the oath of allegiance required by section 337 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1448).”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 512. Money in this Act may not be used to change the oath of allegiance that section 337 of the Immigration and Nationality Act requires of applicants for naturalization.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds made available in this Act may be used to amend the oath of allegiance required by section 337 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1448).”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

No money here may be used to change the oath of allegiance.

What this is about

New citizens say that oath at a ceremony. Its words are set in another law. This blocks any change to them this year.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds provided or otherwise made available by this Act may be made available to carry out section 872 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 452) unless explicitly authorized by the Congress after the date of enactment of this Act.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 513(a). Money in this Act may not be used to carry out section 872 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 unless Congress explicitly authorizes it after this Act is passed. Subsection (b) excepts moves of the Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office's functions that match a named table in the explanatory statement, and subsection (c) lets the Secretary transfer earlier years' money for that office to carry those moves out.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds provided or otherwise made available by this Act may be made available to carry out section 872 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 452) unless explicitly authorized by the Congress after the date of enactment of this Act.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

No money here may be used under one part of a 2002 law. Congress would have to allow it in a later law.

What this is about

That older law is not indexed here. So this site does not say what it allows. One office is carved out of the bar.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds made available in this Act may be used for planning, testing, piloting, or developing a national identification card.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 514. Money in this Act may not be used to plan, test, pilot or develop a national identification card.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds made available in this Act may be used for planning, testing, piloting, or developing a national identification card.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

No money here may be used to plan or build a national ID card.

What this is about

The bar covers early steps too, not just the card. Planning and tests are named.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: officials required to report under the ActHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Any official that is required by this Act to report or to certify to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate may not delegate such authority to perform that act unless specifically authorized herein.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 515. Where this Act requires a named official to report or certify to the Appropriations Committees, that official may not pass the duty to someone else, unless the Act specifically allows it. Several sections do allow it, by naming a designee.

What the document actually says

“Any official that is required by this Act to report or to certify to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate may not delegate such authority to perform that act unless specifically authorized herein.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

An official told to report to Congress must do it in person. The job may not be handed off.

What this is about

Some parts of this law do allow a stand in. Those say so in their own words. Everywhere else, the named person must act.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds made available in this Act may be used for first-class travel by the employees of agencies funded by this Act in contravention of sections 301-10.122 through 301-10.124 of title 41, Code of Federal Regulations.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 516. Money in this Act may not pay for first-class travel by employees of the agencies it funds, except as the federal travel regulations at sections 301-10.122 through 301-10.124 of title 41 allow.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds made available in this Act may be used for first-class travel by the employees of agencies funded by this Act in contravention of sections 301-10.122 through 301-10.124 of title 41, Code of Federal Regulations.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

No money here may pay for a first class seat. The travel rules set the few times it is allowed.

What this is about

Those rules sit in the federal travel code. They are not indexed here. They allow it in rare cases, such as a medical need.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“none of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used to pay award or incentive fees for contractor performance that has been judged to be below satisfactory performance or performance that does not meet the basic requirements of a contract.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 518. Money in this Act may not be used to pay an award or incentive fee to a contractor whose performance has been judged below satisfactory, or which does not meet the basic requirements of the contract.

What the document actually says

“none of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used to pay award or incentive fees for contractor performance that has been judged to be below satisfactory performance or performance that does not meet the basic requirements of a contract.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

No bonus fee may be paid to a firm that did poor work. The same holds if it missed the basic terms.

What this is about

Some contracts pay a bonus for good work. That bonus was still paid at times when work fell short. This blocks that.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds made available in this Act may be used to maintain or establish a computer network unless such network blocks the viewing, downloading, and exchanging of pornography.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 519(a). Money in this Act may not be used to run or set up a computer network unless the network blocks the viewing, downloading and exchanging of pornography. Subsection (b) provides that this does not limit funds needed by law enforcement or others carrying out criminal investigations, prosecutions or adjudications.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds made available in this Act may be used to maintain or establish a computer network unless such network blocks the viewing, downloading, and exchanging of pornography.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

This money may only run a network that blocks porn. Viewing, downloads and sharing must all be blocked.

What this is about

Police work is carved out of the rule. Investigators may need to view such files as evidence.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Federal law enforcement officersHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds made available in this Act may be used by a Federal law enforcement officer to facilitate the transfer of an operable firearm to an individual if the Federal law enforcement officer knows or suspects that the individual is an agent of a drug cartel unless law enforcement personnel of the United States continuously monitor or control the firearm at all times.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 520. Money in this Act may not be used by a federal law enforcement officer to help transfer a working firearm to someone the officer knows or suspects is a cartel agent, unless United States law enforcement personnel monitor or control the weapon continuously.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds made available in this Act may be used by a Federal law enforcement officer to facilitate the transfer of an operable firearm to an individual if the Federal law enforcement officer knows or suspects that the individual is an agent of a drug cartel unless law enforcement personnel of the United States continuously monitor or control the firearm at all times.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

An officer may not help hand a working gun to a suspected cartel agent. The one exception needs constant watch on the gun.

What this is about

This bars letting guns walk to trace them later. Any such gun must be watched at all times.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds made available in this Act may be used to pay for the travel to or attendance of more than 50 employees of a single component of the Department of Homeland Security, who are stationed in the United States, at a single international conference”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 521(a). Money in this Act may not send more than 50 United States based employees of one component to a single international conference, unless the Secretary or a designee finds the attendance is in the national interest and notifies both Appropriations Committees within at least 10 days of that finding. Subsection (c) caps the department's total cost for any such conference at $500,000, and subsection (d) excludes employees who attend virtually.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds made available in this Act may be used to pay for the travel to or attendance of more than 50 employees of a single component of the Department of Homeland Security, who are stationed in the United States, at a single international conference”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

No more than 50 staff from one part of the department may attend one meeting abroad.

What this is about

The cap may be lifted if the Secretary says it serves the country. The whole cost may not top $500,000. Those joining online are not counted.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds made available to the Department of Homeland Security by this or any other Act may be obligated for the implementation of any structural pay reform or the introduction of any new position classification that will affect more than 100 full-time positions or costs more than $5,000,000 in a single year”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 523(a). No money may be committed to a structural pay reform or a new position classification affecting more than 100 full-time positions or costing more than $5,000,000 in a year until 30 days after the Secretary notifies Congress, giving the number of positions affected, the cost this year and across the Future Years Homeland Security Program, a justification, and for a pay reform an analysis of the alternatives considered. Subsection (b) excepts changes proposed in the President's budget for the year this Act funds and not denied or restricted in it.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds made available to the Department of Homeland Security by this or any other Act may be obligated for the implementation of any structural pay reform or the introduction of any new position classification that will affect more than 100 full-time positions or costs more than $5,000,000 in a single year”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

A big change to pay or job classes must wait. The Secretary must first tell Congress and wait 30 days.

What this is about

The rule covers changes touching over 100 jobs. It also covers ones costing over $5,000,000. The notice must show the cost and the reason.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: heads of agencies receiving funds under the ActHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Any agency receiving funds made available in this Act shall, subject to subsections (b) and (c), post on the public website of that agency any report required to be submitted by the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate in this Act, upon the determination by the head of the agency that it shall serve the national interest.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 524(a). An agency funded by this Act must publish on its website any report this Act requires it to give the Appropriations Committees, where the head of the agency determines that doing so serves the national interest. Subsection (b) excepts reports whose publication would compromise homeland or national security or that contain proprietary information, subsection (c) requires a wait of at least 45 days after the Committees receive the report, and subsection (d) suspends the section 503 reprogramming and transfer authority while the section is not complied with.

What the document actually says

“Any agency receiving funds made available in this Act shall, subject to subsections (b) and (c), post on the public website of that agency any report required to be submitted by the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate in this Act, upon the determination by the head of the agency that it shall serve the national interest.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

An agency must post the reports it owes Congress on its website. The agency head must find that doing so serves the country.

What this is about

Reports with secrets or trade data stay off. The rest go up after Congress has had them 45 days. Failing to post costs the agency its transfer power.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “canWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Funding provided in this Act for ``Operations and Support'' may be used for minor procurement, construction, and improvements.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 525(a). Operations and support money may be used for minor procurement, construction and improvements. Subsection (b) defines minor as an item costing $250,000 or less for personal property and $4,000,000 or less for real property.

What the document actually says

“Funding provided in this Act for ``Operations and Support'' may be used for minor procurement, construction, and improvements.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Running money may pay for small buys and small building jobs.

What this is about

Small means up to $250,000 for a thing. For land or a building it means up to $4,000,000. Bigger jobs need the other account.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the funds made available in this Act may be used to place restraints on a woman in the custody of the Department of Homeland Security (including during transport, in a detention facility, or at an outside medical facility) who is pregnant or in post-delivery recuperation.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 527(a). Money in this Act may not be used to restrain a woman in the department's custody who is pregnant or recovering from delivery, whether in transport, in a detention facility or at an outside medical facility. Subsection (b) allows restraints where an official makes an individualized determination that the woman is a serious flight risk or an immediate and serious threat that cannot be prevented by other means, or where a medical professional determines therapeutic restraints are appropriate.

What the document actually says

“Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the funds made available in this Act may be used to place restraints on a woman in the custody of the Department of Homeland Security (including during transport, in a detention facility, or at an outside medical facility) who is pregnant or in post-delivery recuperation.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

A woman in custody who is pregnant may not be put in restraints. The same holds while she heals after birth.

What this is about

The rule covers vans, cells and hospital visits. There are narrow exceptions. One needs a case by case finding. One needs a doctor.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“In no case may restraints be used on a woman who is in active labor or delivery”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 527(c). Where the exceptions in subsection (b) do apply, only the safest and least restrictive restraints determined by the treating medical professional may be used. The subsection then sets absolute limits: no restraints at all during active labor or delivery, and never face down with four-point restraints, on her back, or in a belt constricting the pregnancy. A woman immobilized by restraints is to be positioned on her left side so far as is feasible.

What the document actually says

“In no case may restraints be used on a woman who is in active labor or delivery”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

A woman in labor may never be put in restraints. The same holds while she gives birth.

What this is about

Even where the narrow exceptions apply, some holds are barred. Only the safest kind may be used. A doctor decides which that is.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds made available by this Act may be used to destroy any document, recording, or other record pertaining to any-- (1) death of; (2) potential sexual assault or abuse perpetrated against; or (3) allegation of abuse, criminal activity, or disruption committed by an individual held in the custody of the Department of Homeland Security.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 528(a). Money in this Act may not be used to destroy any document, recording or other record about a death in the department's custody, a potential sexual assault or abuse against someone in custody, or an allegation of abuse, criminal activity or disruption by someone in custody. Subsection (b) requires those records to be made available, under applicable law and the rules on disclosure in litigation, to a person charged, segregated or punished as a result of such an allegation, on request.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds made available by this Act may be used to destroy any document, recording, or other record pertaining to any-- (1) death of; (2) potential sexual assault or abuse perpetrated against; or (3) allegation of abuse, criminal activity, or disruption committed by an individual held in the custody of the Department of Homeland Security.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Records about a death in custody may not be destroyed. Nor may records of abuse or of claims against someone held.

What this is about

The rule covers papers, video and other records. A person punished over such a claim may ask to see them.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Under Secretary for ManagementHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“the Under Secretary for Management of Homeland Security shall submit to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report on the unfunded priorities, for the Department of Homeland Security and separately for each departmental component, for which discretionary funding would be classified as budget function 050.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 530(a). Within 10 days of the President's budget going to Congress, the Under Secretary for Management must report the department's unfunded priorities, for the department as a whole and for each component, in budget function 050. Subsection (b) requires each priority to carry a description, its objectives, account information and the added positions it would fund. Subsection (c) defines an unfunded priority as a requirement not funded in that budget which is needed for an operational or contingency plan and would have been recommended had more money been available.

What the document actually says

“the Under Secretary for Management of Homeland Security shall submit to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report on the unfunded priorities, for the Department of Homeland Security and separately for each departmental component, for which discretionary funding would be classified as budget function 050.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

After the President's budget goes up, a top manager must file a report. It lists needs the budget did not fund.

What this is about

The list covers the whole department and each part. Each item shows what it would buy and what it would cost. The report is due within 10 days.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Not later than 10 days after a determination is made by the President to evaluate and initiate protection under any authority for a former or retired Government official or employee”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 531(a). Within 10 days of the President deciding to evaluate and start protection for a former or retired official, the Secretary must notify congressional leadership and seven committees. Subsection (b) allows the notice to be classified and requires it to give the threat assessment, the scope of the protection and its anticipated cost and duration. Subsection (c) requires notice 15 days before extending or 30 days before terminating protection, and subsection (d) requires a quarterly report on each covered individual.

What the document actually says

“Not later than 10 days after a determination is made by the President to evaluate and initiate protection under any authority for a former or retired Government official or employee”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The President may pick a past official to guard. The Secretary must then tell Congress in 10 days.

What this is about

The notice says why, for how long, and at what cost. It may be classified. More notice is due before it ends.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds provided to the Department of Homeland Security in this or any prior Act may be used by an agency to submit an initial project proposal to the Technology Modernization Fund”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 532(a). No money may be used to send an initial project proposal to the Technology Modernization Fund unless, at the same time, the agency head notifies both Appropriations Committees, sends them a copy of the proposal and explains how the funding would supplement or supplant what the department already asked for. Subsection (b) holds any money the department receives from the Fund until 15 days after a report on it goes to the Committees, and subsection (c) lists what that report must contain.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds provided to the Department of Homeland Security in this or any prior Act may be used by an agency to submit an initial project proposal to the Technology Modernization Fund”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

No money may be used to ask a tech fund for a project. Not unless Congress gets the same papers at once.

What this is about

The fund lends money for new computer systems. Congress wants the request and a repayment plan. Money from the fund waits 15 days.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Within 60 days of any budget submission for the Department of Homeland Security for fiscal year 2027 that assumes revenues or proposes a reduction from the previous year based on user fees proposals that have not been enacted into law prior to the submission of the budget, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall provide the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate specific reductions in proposed discretionary budget authority”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 533. Where the department's fiscal year 2027 budget request counts on user fees that have not been enacted, the Secretary has 60 days to tell both Appropriations Committees which specific reductions in discretionary budget authority would match those assumed revenues if the fees are not enacted before October 1, 2026.

What the document actually says

“Within 60 days of any budget submission for the Department of Homeland Security for fiscal year 2027 that assumes revenues or proposes a reduction from the previous year based on user fees proposals that have not been enacted into law prior to the submission of the budget, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall provide the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate specific reductions in proposed discretionary budget authority”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

A budget may count on new fees that are not law yet. If so, the Secretary must show what would be cut instead.

What this is about

The list is due within 60 days of the budget. It must match the money the fees were meant to raise.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds made available by this Act may be obligated or expended to implement the Arms Trade Treaty until the Senate approves a resolution of ratification for the Treaty.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 534. Money in this Act may not be committed or spent to implement the Arms Trade Treaty unless and until the Senate approves a resolution of ratification for it.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds made available by this Act may be obligated or expended to implement the Arms Trade Treaty until the Senate approves a resolution of ratification for the Treaty.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

No money here may be used to carry out the Arms Trade Treaty. The Senate would have to approve it first.

What this is about

A treaty is signed first, then the Senate votes. This one had not had that vote. So no money may go to it.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“No Federal funds made available to the Department of Homeland Security may be used to enter into a procurement contract, memorandum of understanding, or cooperative agreement with, or make a grant to, or provide a loan or guarantee to, any entity identified under section 1260H of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Public Law 116-283) or any subsidiary of such entity.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 535. No federal money available to the department may be used to contract with, sign an agreement with, grant to, or lend to an entity identified under section 1260H of the fiscal year 2021 defense authorization act, or any subsidiary of one. Which entities are on that list is set under Public Law 116-283, which is not indexed here.

What the document actually says

“No Federal funds made available to the Department of Homeland Security may be used to enter into a procurement contract, memorandum of understanding, or cooperative agreement with, or make a grant to, or provide a loan or guarantee to, any entity identified under section 1260H of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Public Law 116-283) or any subsidiary of such entity.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The department may not sign a deal with a firm on one federal list. That covers its subsidiaries too.

What this is about

The list is kept under a 2021 defense law. That law is not indexed here. So this site does not say who is on it.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available in this or any other Act may be used to transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or release to or within the United States, its territories, or possessions Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or any other detainee”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 536. Money in this or any other Act may not be used to transfer or release into or within the United States, its territories or possessions, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or any other detainee who is not a United States citizen or a member of the Armed Forces and who is or was held at Guantanamo Bay by the Department of Defense on or after June 24, 2009.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available in this or any other Act may be used to transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or release to or within the United States, its territories, or possessions Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or any other detainee”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

No money may be used to bring named detainees into the country. Nor may it help move them here.

What this is about

The bar covers those held at Guantanamo Bay since June 2009. It does not cover citizens or service members.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“The Secretary of Homeland Security shall, on a monthly basis beginning immediately after the date of enactment of this Act, develop estimates of the number of migrants anticipated to arrive at the southwest border of the United States.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 537(a). From enactment, the Secretary must produce monthly estimates of how many migrants are expected to arrive at the southwest border. Subsection (b) requires the estimates to cover this year and next, to break out single adults, family units and unaccompanied children, to undergo independent validation and verification, to inform planning and budgeting, and to be included in budget materials sent to Congress. Subsection (c) requires them to be shared with the Departments of Health and Human Services, Justice and State and with both Appropriations Committees.

What the document actually says

“The Secretary of Homeland Security shall, on a monthly basis beginning immediately after the date of enactment of this Act, develop estimates of the number of migrants anticipated to arrive at the southwest border of the United States.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Each month the Secretary must guess how many will reach the border. That is the border to the south.

What this is about

The estimate must split out adults, families and children alone. It must be checked by someone else. Budget requests must use it.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“develop estimates of the number of individuals anticipated to be detained in and removed from the United States.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 538(a). From enactment, the Secretary must produce monthly estimates of how many people are expected to be detained in and removed from the United States. As with the border estimates, subsection (b) requires them to cover two fiscal years, to break out single adults and family units, to undergo independent validation and verification, and to appear in the budget materials sent to Congress, and subsection (c) requires them to be shared with the Attorney General, the Secretary of State and both Appropriations Committees.

What the document actually says

“develop estimates of the number of individuals anticipated to be detained in and removed from the United States.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The Secretary must also guess how many people will be held and sent home.

What this is about

This estimate is made each month, like the border one. It splits out adults and families. Budget asks must line up with it.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“If the monthly estimates described in subsection (b) are not provided for the purposes described, the reprogramming and transfer authority provided in section 503 of this Act shall be suspended”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The closing subsection of both section 537 and section 538, in the same words. If the monthly estimates are not provided for the purposes those sections describe, the department's reprogramming and transfer authority under section 503 is suspended until the estimates reach both Appropriations Committees.

What the document actually says

“If the monthly estimates described in subsection (b) are not provided for the purposes described, the reprogramming and transfer authority provided in section 503 of this Act shall be suspended”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

If the monthly counts are not sent, the department loses a power. It may not shift money around.

What this is about

Section 503 lets the department move money between uses. That power stops until the counts arrive. The same rule ends both estimate sections.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Prior to the Secretary of Homeland Security requesting assistance from the Department of Defense for border security operations, the Secretary shall ensure that an alternatives analysis and cost-benefit analysis is conducted before such request is made, which shall include an examination of obtaining such support through other means.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 539(a). Before asking the Department of Defense for help with border security operations, the Secretary must see that an alternatives analysis and a cost-benefit analysis are done, including a look at getting the support another way. Subsection (b) requires a report to both Appropriations Committees within 30 days of a request, and subsection (c) requires a further report within 30 days of a request being granted and quarterly while the help continues.

What the document actually says

“Prior to the Secretary of Homeland Security requesting assistance from the Department of Defense for border security operations, the Secretary shall ensure that an alternatives analysis and cost-benefit analysis is conducted before such request is made, which shall include an examination of obtaining such support through other means.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The Secretary may want help from the military at the border. First the choices must be weighed. So must the cost.

What this is about

The study must look at other ways to get the same help. A report is due within 30 days of the ask. More follow each quarter.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “canWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Funds made available in this Act or any other Act for Operations and Support may be used for the necessary expenses of providing an employee emergency back-up care program.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 540. Operations and support money, in this Act or any other, may be used to run an emergency back-up care program for employees.

What the document actually says

“Funds made available in this Act or any other Act for Operations and Support may be used for the necessary expenses of providing an employee emergency back-up care program.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Running money may pay for a back-up care plan for staff.

What this is about

Back-up care covers a child or an elder when normal care falls through. Staff can then still come to work.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“the amount made available for ``Office of the Secretary and Executive Management--Operations and Support--Management and Oversight'' shall be reduced by $100,000 for each day such report is not submitted and published on the Agency's website”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 541(a). The monthly Disaster Relief Fund report carried forward by section 306 must reach both Appropriations Committees and be published on FEMA's website by the fifth business day of the month. Each day it is late costs the department's management and oversight account $100,000. Subsection (b) applies the same daily cut whenever more than 500 reimbursement requests have sat under final review for over 60 days, and subsection (c) excepts periods when the disaster fund balance is only enough for lifesaving work.

What the document actually says

“the amount made available for ``Office of the Secretary and Executive Management--Operations and Support--Management and Oversight'' shall be reduced by $100,000 for each day such report is not submitted and published on the Agency's website”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

For each day the report is late, one account loses $100,000. The report must also be posted online.

What this is about

The cut hits the front office of the department, not FEMA. A second rule bites when too many payback asks sit unanswered.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“The levels for appropriations accounts specified for classified programs in this Act shall conform to the direction included in the classified annex accompanying this Act and shall be implemented in a manner consistent with section 545.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 543. Where this Act sets a level for a classified program, that level follows the direction in the classified annex that accompanies the Act, and is to be carried out consistently with section 545. The annex itself is not public and is not indexed here.

What the document actually says

“The levels for appropriations accounts specified for classified programs in this Act shall conform to the direction included in the classified annex accompanying this Act and shall be implemented in a manner consistent with section 545.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Secret program funding follows a secret annex to this law. It must also match another rule in the law.

What this is about

Some spending cannot be printed in public. It goes in a sealed annex. That annex is not indexed on this site.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Within seven days of the date of enactment of this Act, and quarterly thereafter, the Department shall submit to the Committees on Appropriation of the House of Representatives and the Senate-- (1) an obligation plan by program, project, or activity for each component receiving funds from Public Law 119-21”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 545. Within seven days of enactment and each quarter after, the department must give both Appropriations Committees an obligation plan for each component holding money from Public Law 119-21, estimated fee collections for each component collecting new or enhanced fees under that law, split between what it keeps and what it remits, and an obligation plan for the fees it keeps.

What the document actually says

“Within seven days of the date of enactment of this Act, and quarterly thereafter, the Department shall submit to the Committees on Appropriation of the House of Representatives and the Senate-- (1) an obligation plan by program, project, or activity for each component receiving funds from Public Law 119-21”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Within seven days the department must file spending plans. They cover money from an earlier law. New plans are due each quarter.

What this is about

That earlier law gave the department money and new fees. This asks where both are going. The site does not index that law.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Homeland Security by this Act may be used to prevent any of the following persons from entering, for the purpose of conducting oversight, any facility operated by or for the Department of Homeland Security used to detain or otherwise house aliens”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 546(a). Money in this Act may not be used to stop a member of Congress, or an employee of either chamber designated by a member for this purpose, from entering a facility run by or for the department that detains or houses aliens, when they are there to conduct oversight. The same subsection bars any temporary modification at such a facility that alters what a visiting member or designated employee would otherwise observe.

What the document actually says

“None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Homeland Security by this Act may be used to prevent any of the following persons from entering, for the purpose of conducting oversight, any facility operated by or for the Department of Homeland Security used to detain or otherwise house aliens”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The department may not block a member of Congress from a detention site. The visit must be for oversight.

What this is about

The rule also bars dressing the place up for a visit. What a member sees must be what is normally there.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may not be construedWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Nothing in this section may be construed to require a Member of Congress to provide prior notice of the intent to enter a facility described in subsection (a) for the purpose of conducting oversight.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 546(b). The section may not be read to require a member of Congress to give notice before entering a detention facility for oversight. Subsection (c) allows the department to require 24 hours notice from a designated congressional employee, but not from a member.

What the document actually says

“Nothing in this section may be construed to require a Member of Congress to provide prior notice of the intent to enter a facility described in subsection (a) for the purpose of conducting oversight.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

A member of Congress does not have to give notice first. They may show up to look at a site.

What this is about

Staff sent in a member's place are treated differently. The department may ask them for a day's notice.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“In addition to amounts otherwise made available for such purposes, there is appropriated $30,000,000, for an additional amount for ``The Judiciary--Supreme Court of the United States--Salaries and Expenses'', to remain available until September 30, 2028”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 547. An appropriation of $30,000,000 to the salaries and expenses account of the Supreme Court, available through September 30, 2028, subject to the same authorities and conditions as if it had been provided in the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act, 2026. It is one of two appropriations in this Act that go outside the Department of Homeland Security.

What the document actually says

“In addition to amounts otherwise made available for such purposes, there is appropriated $30,000,000, for an additional amount for ``The Judiciary--Supreme Court of the United States--Salaries and Expenses'', to remain available until September 30, 2028”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The Supreme Court gets $30,000,000 more. The money lasts until September 30, 2028.

What this is about

This law mostly pays for homeland security. This line does not. It rides along in the same bill.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Aviation AdministrationHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“There is appropriated $140,000,000 for an additional amount for ``Department of Transportation--Federal Aviation Administration--Operations'' for air traffic organization activities, to remain available until September 30, 2027”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 548. An appropriation of $140,000,000 to the operations account of the Federal Aviation Administration for air traffic organization activities, available through September 30, 2027, subject to the same authorities and conditions as if provided in the Department of Transportation Appropriations Act, 2026. It is the second of the two appropriations in this Act that go outside the Department of Homeland Security.

What the document actually says

“There is appropriated $140,000,000 for an additional amount for ``Department of Transportation--Federal Aviation Administration--Operations'' for air traffic organization activities, to remain available until September 30, 2027”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Air traffic work gets $140,000,000. The money lasts until September 30, 2027.

What this is about

This money goes to the agency that runs air traffic. It is not part of homeland security. It rides along in the same bill.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Aviation AdministrationHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“That the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall only use such amounts to provide a rate of pay increase for calendar year 2026 of 3.8 percent, for air traffic controllers”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

A proviso on section 548. The $140,000,000 may be used only for a 3.8 percent pay increase for calendar year 2026 for air traffic controllers as defined in section 2109(1)(A) of title 5, and for controller supervisors and managers not covered by that section who manage air traffic. Further provisos condition the increase on the Administrator determining, in his sole discretion, that improvements in scheduling, staffing utilization or other operational efficiencies are achieved, and make it effective from the first pay period after January 1, 2026 if he so determines.

What the document actually says

“That the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall only use such amounts to provide a rate of pay increase for calendar year 2026 of 3.8 percent, for air traffic controllers”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The money may only pay for a raise. The raise is 3.8 percent for 2026. It goes to air traffic controllers.

What this is about

Their bosses who direct traffic get it too. The head of the agency must first find that work practices improved. Then the raise starts.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may notWho acts: Secretary of Homeland SecurityHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Notwithstanding section 503(c) of this Act, no amounts may be transferred to ``U.S. Customs and Border Protection--Operations and Support'' for Border Security Operations in the ``Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026'' table of the explanatory statement regarding this Act”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 549, the last provision of division A. The 5 percent transfer authority in section 503(c) may not be used to move money to the border agency's operations account for Border Security Operations as that line appears in the explanatory statement table. Section 4 separately sets the amounts under that heading in the table at $0.

What the document actually says

“Notwithstanding section 503(c) of this Act, no amounts may be transferred to ``U.S. Customs and Border Protection--Operations and Support'' for Border Security Operations in the ``Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026'' table of the explanatory statement regarding this Act”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

No money may be moved to one border line in the report table. That holds despite the transfer rule.

What this is about

Section 503 normally allows small transfers. This shuts one off. Section 4 already set that line at zero.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may be cited asWho acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“This division may be cited as the ``Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026''.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The line that closes division A. The division was written as a standalone appropriations act and gives itself its own short title, which is how it is cited elsewhere.

What the document actually says

“This division may be cited as the ``Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026''.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The first big part of this law has its own name.

What this is about

Each division names itself at its end. That is how others cite it. Section 3 says the words this Act mean just that division.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “is amendedWho acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026 (division A of Public Law 119-37) is further amended by substituting the date of enactment of this Act for the date specified in section 106(3).”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 101 of division B. A textual amendment to the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026, replacing the date in its section 106(3) with the date this Act was enacted, April 30, 2026. What that earlier act provides is in Public Law 119-37, which is not indexed here.

What the document actually says

“The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026 (division A of Public Law 119-37) is further amended by substituting the date of enactment of this Act for the date specified in section 106(3).”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

One date in an earlier law is swapped out. The new date is the day this law passed.

What this is about

That earlier law kept agencies funded to a set date. This moves that date. The old law is not indexed here.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“For the purposes of the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026 (division A of Public Law 119-37), the time covered by such Act shall be considered to include the period which began on or about February 14, 2026, during which there occurred a lapse in appropriations.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 102 of division B. For the purposes of the earlier continuing appropriations act, the time it covers is treated as including the period beginning on or about February 14, 2026 during which there was a lapse in appropriations. The Act does not fix the start of that period exactly, saying on or about.

What the document actually says

“For the purposes of the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026 (division A of Public Law 119-37), the time covered by such Act shall be considered to include the period which began on or about February 14, 2026, during which there occurred a lapse in appropriations.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

There was a gap when money ran out. It began on or about February 14, 2026. The earlier law is now read to cover that gap.

What this is about

When funding lapses, much of the government stops. This treats the gap as if it had been funded all along.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: heads of each department and agencyHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“Amounts made available in division A of the Homeland Security and Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026, the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026 (division A of Public Law 119-37), and Public Law 119-21 for personnel pay, allowances, and benefits in each department and agency shall be available for payments pursuant to subsection (c) of section 1341 of title 31, United States Code, and such payments shall be made.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 103 of division B. Money for personnel pay, allowances and benefits under division A of this Act, under the earlier continuing appropriations act and under Public Law 119-21 is available for payments under section 1341(c) of title 31, and the section provides that those payments shall be made.

What the document actually says

“Amounts made available in division A of the Homeland Security and Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026, the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026 (division A of Public Law 119-37), and Public Law 119-21 for personnel pay, allowances, and benefits in each department and agency shall be available for payments pursuant to subsection (c) of section 1341 of title 31, United States Code, and such payments shall be made.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Money set aside for pay and benefits may be used for these payments. The law says the payments must be made.

What this is about

Section 1341 is the rule on spending without funding. Its subsection (c) deals with pay after a gap. This makes the money available and orders the payments.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“for the purposes of maintaining the essential level of activity to protect life and property and bringing about orderly termination of Government function, and for purposes as otherwise authorized by law, are hereby ratified and approved if otherwise in accord with the provisions of such Acts.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 104 of division B. Obligations incurred, and incurred in anticipation of the money and authority given by division A of this Act and by the earlier continuing appropriations act, are ratified and approved where they were for keeping up the essential level of activity to protect life and property, for bringing about an orderly shutdown, or for other purposes authorized by law, and were otherwise in accord with those acts.

What the document actually says

“for the purposes of maintaining the essential level of activity to protect life and property and bringing about orderly termination of Government function, and for purposes as otherwise authorized by law, are hereby ratified and approved if otherwise in accord with the provisions of such Acts.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

Some work went on to guard life and property. Some was needed to shut things down in order. That work is now approved.

What this is about

During a funding gap, agencies still take on costs. This law signs off on them after the fact. Only work within the rules is covered.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may be cited asWho acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“This division may be cited as the ``Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026''.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

The line that closes division B, and the last line of section 5. The division gives itself its own short title, which is the second of the two names the Act's own short title in section 1 points to.

What the document actually says

“This division may be cited as the ``Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026''.”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The second big part of this law has its own name.

What this is about

This is the last line of the money part. The name matches the one in the law's own short title.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Homeland Security and Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026., Public Law 119-86, sec. 5, 140 Stat. 774 (2026).
    https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-119publ86/html/PLAW-119publ86.htm

  2. This page

    “Statement of Appropriations,” Homeland Security and Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026., section 5. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/homeland-security-further-additional-continuing/section-5/ (retrieved August 26, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

What This Page Covers, and What It Leaves Out

The sentence that makes section 5 an appropriation; every account paragraph in division A, with the sum, how long the money stays available and the named splits inside it; the fourteen allocations inside the Federal Emergency Management Agency's federal assistance account; a large selection of the numbered administrative and general provisions, chosen where they impose a duty, a deadline, a prohibition or a further appropriation; the short title line that closes each division; and all four sections of division B.

Some of the numbered provisions in division A. Section 5 runs to about 16,600 words and carries 149 numbered provisions across the two divisions. Those not recorded here are real provisions and this site does not suggest otherwise; they were left out because they set procedure that repeats an earlier act, or restate an authority in a form that adds nothing to what is already recorded. Also not indexed: the many provisos setting reception and representation expense caps, the detailed contents lists inside a required report, and the tables of specific amounts, because those tables are printed in the explanatory statement described in section 4 rather than in the Act.

Section 5 appropriates by naming sums rather than by commanding, so most account paragraphs carry no operative verb of their own. They are recorded in the mandatory form, because the section's opening sentence provides that the following sums are appropriated and the account paragraphs govern how long that money shall remain available. Several accounts are recorded from a fragment of a much longer sentence, because the sentence naming the sum runs for hundreds of words and the quotation cap is 90; where that happens, the quotation starts mid sentence at the nearest clause before the figure. Many provisions apply, amend or extend an older statute, and what those older statutes say is not described here because they are not indexed on this site. The sums recorded are what this Act provides, not an agency's total budget: an agency may also hold money from earlier acts, fee collections, or trust funds, and several accounts here are reduced as fees arrive.