No award fees for below satisfactory contractor performance
What the document says“none of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used to pay award or incentive fees for contractor performance that has been judged to be below satisfactory performance or performance that does not meet the basic requirements of a contract.”
Section 518. Money in this Act may not be used to pay an award or incentive fee to a contractor whose performance has been judged below satisfactory, or which does not meet the basic requirements of the contract.
What the document actually says“none of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used to pay award or incentive fees for contractor performance that has been judged to be below satisfactory performance or performance that does not meet the basic requirements of a contract.”
No bonus fee may be paid to a firm that did poor work. The same holds if it missed the basic terms.
Some contracts pay a bonus for good work. That bonus was still paid at times when work fell short. This blocks that.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.