Read theMandate

Homeland Security and Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026.Section 5 › Proposal

Training center instructors are inherently governmental

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, section 5, Sec. 5. Written by .

Training center instructors are inherently governmental

The document says “shallWho acts: Director of the Federal Law Enforcement Training CentersHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says

“The functions of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers instructor staff shall be classified as inherently governmental for purposes of the Federal Activities Inventory Reform Act of 1998 (31 U.S.C. 501 note).”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5

Section 407. The work of the training centers' instructor staff is classified as inherently governmental under the Federal Activities Inventory Reform Act of 1998, the law under which agencies list which of their functions could be performed by a private contractor.

What the document actually says

“The functions of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers instructor staff shall be classified as inherently governmental for purposes of the Federal Activities Inventory Reform Act of 1998 (31 U.S.C. 501 note).”

Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, Sec. 5
That sentence, in plain words

The work of these instructors counts as government work. A 1998 law sets that class.

What this is about

Agencies list which jobs a private firm could do. Jobs in this class stay with the government. Instructor jobs are put in that class.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →