$6,000,000 for a missing and exploited children grant
Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes, section 5, Sec. 5.
Written by .
$6,000,000 for a missing and exploited children grant
The document says “shall”Who acts: Director of the United States Secret ServiceHow: statuteSec. 5 in the PDF
What the document says
“of which $6,000,000 shall be for a grant for activities related to investigations of missing and exploited children”
Part of the same account paragraph. Of the Secret Service's operations and support money, $6,000,000 is directed to a grant for activities related to investigations of missing and exploited children.
What the document actually says
“of which $6,000,000 shall be for a grant for activities related to investigations of missing and exploited children”
That sentence, in plain words
Of that money, $6,000,000 is a grant. It helps with cases of missing and abused children.
What this is about
The grant goes outside the agency. It pays for work on these cases. The law does not name who gets it.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
Homeland Security and Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026., Public Law 119-86, sec. 5, 140 Stat. 774 (2026). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-119publ86/html/PLAW-119publ86.htm
This page
“$6,000,000 for a missing and exploited children grant,” Homeland Security and Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026., section 5, Sec. 5. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/homeland-security-further-additional-continuing/proposal/sec05-secret-service-missing-children-grant/ (retrieved August 26, 2026).
Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.
How to Read This Page
The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page
number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary,
not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the
quotation rather than replacing it.
