Read theMandate

Increase the supply of housing in AmericaSection 1001 › Proposal

A large institutional investor may not buy a single-family home

To increase the supply of housing in America, and for other purposes, section 1001, Sec. 1001. Written by .

A large institutional investor may not buy a single-family home

The document says “may notWho acts: large institutional investorsHow: statuteSec. 1001 in the PDF
What the document says

“No large institutional investor may purchase, or enter into a contract to directly or indirectly purchase, any single-family home.”

To increase the supply of housing in America, and for other purposes, Sec. 1001

The section bars a large institutional investor from buying, or contracting to buy directly or indirectly, any single-family home. The bar does not reach an excepted purchase or a purchase in connection with restructuring or reorganizing ownership of homes owned or bought on or before enactment.

What the document actually says

“No large institutional investor may purchase, or enter into a contract to directly or indirectly purchase, any single-family home.”

To increase the supply of housing in America, and for other purposes, Sec. 1001
That sentence, in plain words

A large investor may not buy a single-family home. It may not sign a deal to buy one either. That holds whether it buys straight out or through another body.

What this is about

The bar has carve-outs set out elsewhere in the section. Homes already owned are not touched. Reorganizing ownership of those homes is allowed.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →