Infill site and greenfield are defined, and risky or empty land is excluded
What the document says“(A) means a site that is served by existing infrastructure, including water lines, sewer lines, and roads; and (B) does not include-- (i) a site that is served by existing infrastructure that only consists of a road;”
The section defines an infill site as one served by existing infrastructure including water lines, sewer lines, and roads, and excludes a site served only by a road, a site in a census tract rated very high or relatively high risk for wildfire, coastal flooding, or riverine flooding under the National Risk Index of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and a greenfield. A greenfield is defined as an undeveloped site, including woodland, farmland, and open field.
What the document actually says“(A) means a site that is served by existing infrastructure, including water lines, sewer lines, and roads; and (B) does not include-- (i) a site that is served by existing infrastructure that only consists of a road;”
This kind of land already has pipes and roads. Land with only a road does not count.
The word infill means filling a gap in a built-up place. Land at high risk of fire or flood is left out. So is land that has never been built on.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.