States, cities, and counties must spend the money carrying plans out
What the document says“(A) implement and administer housing strategies and housing plans; (B) implement and administer any plans to increase housing choice, address disparities in housing needs, and provide greater access to opportunity;”
A State, insular area, metropolitan city, or urban county that receives money under the section must use it to carry out and administer housing strategies and plans, plans to increase housing choice and address disparities, community investments supporting those plans, regulatory work on reformed zoning codes, capacity for housing inspections and for reducing barriers to housing supply and affordability, local or regional community development plans, and planning to increase affordable housing, transit access, and location-efficient development goals.
What the document actually says“(A) implement and administer housing strategies and housing plans; (B) implement and administer any plans to increase housing choice, address disparities in housing needs, and provide greater access to opportunity;”
The money can pay to carry out housing plans and run them. It can pay to carry out plans that widen housing choice and close gaps in what people need.
The planning agencies write the plans. The states and cities put them to work. That is why the two lists differ.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.