A grant is on top of the recipient's formula allocation
To increase the supply of housing in America, and for other purposes, section 210, Sec. 210.
Written by .
A grant is on top of the recipient's formula allocation
The document says “shall not”Who acts: Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentHow: statuteSec. 210 in the PDF
What the document says
“A covered grant awarded to an eligible entity shall be in addition to, and shall not affect, the formula allocation for the eligible entity under section 217.”
The new section 227 provides that a grant under the pilot program is in addition to, and does not affect, the recipient's formula allocation under section 217 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act.
What the document actually says
“A covered grant awarded to an eligible entity shall be in addition to, and shall not affect, the formula allocation for the eligible entity under section 217.”
That sentence, in plain words
The grant adds to what a place already gets. It does not change that other amount.
What this is about
A formula allocation is money split by a set rule. Every place in the program gets some. This grant sits on top of that.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
Increase the supply of housing in America, Public Law 119-101, sec. 210, 140 Stat. 880 (2026). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-119publ101/html/PLAW-119publ101.htm
This page
“A grant is on top of the recipient's formula allocation,” Increase the supply of housing in America, section 210, Sec. 210. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/pl-119-101/proposal/sec210-formula-allocation/ (retrieved October 10, 2026).
Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.
How to Read This Page
The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page
number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary,
not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the
quotation rather than replacing it.
