Four kinds of place are excluded from the adjustment
What the document says“(C) during the 3-year period preceding the date on which the Secretary allocates funds under section 106, the jurisdiction of the covered recipient has been the subject of a major disaster or emergency declaration”
The section defines an eligible recipient as any metropolitan city or urban county receiving funds under section 106 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, unless it has both rents at or below the 60th percentile of covered recipients and a median home value below the national median, or a rental vacancy rate above the national rate, or has been the subject of a major disaster or emergency declaration under section 401 or 501 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act in the preceding three years, or lacks legal authority to enact or update zoning and permitting ordinances.
What the document actually says“(C) during the 3-year period preceding the date on which the Secretary allocates funds under section 106, the jurisdiction of the covered recipient has been the subject of a major disaster or emergency declaration”
A place hit by a big disaster is left out. That covers the three years before the money is handed out.
Three other things also leave a place out. Cheap rents and homes is one. A high share of empty rentals is another. So is having no power to set zoning.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.