Read theMandate

Increase the supply of housing in AmericaSection 501 › Proposal

A project reviewed once is not reviewed again for a change of funding source

To increase the supply of housing in America, and for other purposes, section 501, Sec. 501. Written by .

A project reviewed once is not reviewed again for a change of funding source

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentHow: statuteSec. 501 in the PDF
What the document says

“the Secretary shall ensure that a project that has undergone an environmental review under this section shall not be subject to a duplicative environmental review solely due to the addition, substitution, or reallocation of other sources of Federal assistance, if the scope, scale, and location of the project remain substantially unchanged.”

To increase the supply of housing in America, and for other purposes, Sec. 501

The section adds a new subsection (f) to section 288 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act requiring the Secretary, so far as practicable and permitted by law, to see that a project already reviewed is not reviewed again simply because federal funding sources are added, swapped, or moved, where the scope, scale, and location stay substantially the same. The Secretary must also provide by regulation for coordinating review responsibilities with other federal agencies, and a project may not be reviewed again where a substantially similar review has been completed by a body designated under section 104(g)(1) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 or one the Secretary finds has equivalent authority. The Secretary must issue rules within a year.

What the document actually says

“the Secretary shall ensure that a project that has undergone an environmental review under this section shall not be subject to a duplicative environmental review solely due to the addition, substitution, or reallocation of other sources of Federal assistance, if the scope, scale, and location of the project remain substantially unchanged.”

To increase the supply of housing in America, and for other purposes, Sec. 501
That sentence, in plain words

A project already checked for its effect on nature is not checked twice. Adding or swapping federal money does not trigger a new check. That holds if the project stays much the same in size and place.

What this is about

A project can draw money from several federal sources. Each could ask for its own study. This says one study is enough.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Increase the supply of housing in America, Public Law 119-101, sec. 501, 140 Stat. 907 (2026).
    https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-119publ101/html/PLAW-119publ101.htm

  2. This page

    “A project reviewed once is not reviewed again for a change of funding source,” Increase the supply of housing in America, section 501, Sec. 501. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/pl-119-101/proposal/sec501-duplicative-reviews/ (retrieved August 26, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →