A request must show local need, a plan, and how it fits the Consolidated Plan
What the document says“``(i) A demonstration of local needs and circumstances that necessitate a waiver. ``(ii) A detailed plan for how the recipient intends to use funds. ``(iii) A justification for how the proposed use of funds supports the most recent Consolidated Plan submitted by the recipient.”
The new subsection requires a recipient seeking a waiver to submit a request containing no more than a showing of the local needs and circumstances that make a waiver necessary, a detailed plan for using the funds, a justification for how that use supports its most recent Consolidated Plan, and any public input it gathered.
What the document actually says“``(i) A demonstration of local needs and circumstances that necessitate a waiver. ``(ii) A detailed plan for how the recipient intends to use funds. ``(iii) A justification for how the proposed use of funds supports the most recent Consolidated Plan submitted by the recipient.”
The request must show what the place needs and why. It must give a full plan for the money. It must show how that plan fits the place's own housing plan.
A Consolidated Plan is a housing plan a place files with the housing agency. The law caps what may be asked for. Nothing beyond these four items is required.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.