The study must weigh effects on homelessness, poverty, earnings, and capacity
What the document says“including the effects work requirements have on homelessness rates, poverty rates, asset building, earnings growth, job attainment and retention, and public housing agencies' administrative capacity; and”
The section requires the study to consider the short, medium, and long-term benefits and challenges of work requirements for both the agencies and the participants subject to them, including effects on homelessness rates, poverty rates, asset building, earnings growth, getting and keeping a job, and the agencies' administrative capacity, and to include both numbers and interviews with participants and their resident councils.
What the document actually says“including the effects work requirements have on homelessness rates, poverty rates, asset building, earnings growth, job attainment and retention, and public housing agencies' administrative capacity; and”
The study must weigh what the rules did. It must look at how many people lost a home and how many stayed poor. It must look at savings, pay, and whether people found and kept work. It must also look at what the rules cost the agencies to run.
The study must use both numbers and people's own words. It must talk to tenants covered by the rules. It must also talk to their resident councils.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.