Read theMandate

Increase the supply of housing in America › Section 905

Systemic Risk Authority Transparency

Section 905 · Sec. 905 ·

What this chapter is about

This part is about what must be told to Congress when a bank fails and the government invokes a systemic risk finding. The audit arm of Congress must review the finding twice. The bank's regulator must also report twice. Exam records from the last three years must be handed over. Materials must be published as far as possible.

6 proposals indexed from this chapter.

The document says “shallWho acts: Comptroller General of the United StatesHow: statuteSec. 905 in the PDF
What the document says

“The Comptroller General of the United States shall, not later than 60 days after a determination is made under clause (i), and again 180 days thereafter, review and report to the Congress on the determination under clause (i), including--”

To increase the supply of housing in America, and for other purposes, Sec. 905

The section rewrites section 13(c)(4)(G)(iv) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to require the Comptroller General of the United States to review a systemic risk determination and report to Congress within 60 days and again 180 days later. The review must cover the basis for the determination, the purpose of any action taken, its likely effect on the incentives and conduct of banks and uninsured depositors, mismanagement by the failed bank's executives and board, the bank's compensation practices, supervisory or regulatory shortcomings at its federal banking agency, actions taken by the banking regulators, the Financial Stability Oversight Council, the Treasury and other regulators, and any other entities or activities that contributed, including auditing, accounting, credit rating agencies, investment bank underwriters, and emergency liquidity such as loans from the Federal reserve banks or advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank system.

What the document actually says

“The Comptroller General of the United States shall, not later than 60 days after a determination is made under clause (i), and again 180 days thereafter, review and report to the Congress on the determination under clause (i), including--”

To increase the supply of housing in America, and for other purposes, Sec. 905
That sentence, in plain words

The audit arm of Congress must review the choice and report on it. The first report is due within 60 days. A second follows 180 days later.

What this is about

A systemic risk finding lets the government act outside the usual rules when a bank fails. The reviews ask why the finding was made and what it did. They also look at what went wrong at the bank.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may not be construedWho acts: Federal agenciesHow: statuteSec. 905 in the PDF
What the document says

“Nothing in this clause or a report issued pursuant to this clause may be construed to limit the authority of a Federal agency to enforce violations of Federal statutes, rules, or orders.''.”

To increase the supply of housing in America, and for other purposes, Sec. 905

The section states that nothing in the review clause or a report issued under it may be read as limiting a federal agency's power to enforce violations of federal statutes, rules, or orders.

What the document actually says

“Nothing in this clause or a report issued pursuant to this clause may be construed to limit the authority of a Federal agency to enforce violations of Federal statutes, rules, or orders.''.”

To increase the supply of housing in America, and for other purposes, Sec. 905
That sentence, in plain words

This part does not cut back what a federal agency may do. Agencies may still act on breaches of federal law and rules.

What this is about

A report might name wrongdoing. That does not settle the matter. Agencies keep their power to act on it.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: appropriate Federal banking agenciesHow: statuteSec. 905 in the PDF
What the document says

“The appropriate Federal banking agency of an insured depository institution about which a determination is made under paragraph (4)(G)(i) shall, not later than 90 days after the date of such determination, and again 210 days thereafter, submit a report to the Congress that discloses the following:”

To increase the supply of housing in America, and for other purposes, Sec. 905

The section adds a new paragraph (12) to section 13(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act requiring the failed bank's federal banking agency to report to Congress within 90 days of a systemic risk determination and again 210 days later. The report must disclose, subject to redactions protecting personal information about customers and other institutions, all examination and inspection reports on the bank from the previous three years, all formal communications of a material supervisory determination in that period, and any other exam reports or correspondence the agency finds relevant, together with an examination of mismanagement by the bank's executives and board, any supervisory or regulatory shortcomings of the agency itself, any dynamics that may have contributed to the failure, and any recommendations to improve safety and soundness.

What the document actually says

“The appropriate Federal banking agency of an insured depository institution about which a determination is made under paragraph (4)(G)(i) shall, not later than 90 days after the date of such determination, and again 210 days thereafter, submit a report to the Congress that discloses the following:”

To increase the supply of housing in America, and for other purposes, Sec. 905
That sentence, in plain words

The bank's own regulator must report to Congress. The first report is due within 90 days. A second follows 210 days later.

What this is about

The report must hand over exam papers from the last three years. It must also cover what the bank's leaders did wrong. It must cover what the regulator itself missed.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “may not be construedWho acts: Federal banking agenciesHow: statuteSec. 905 in the PDF
What the document says

“``(I) waiving, destroying, or otherwise affecting any privilege applicable to the information; or ``(II) waiving any exemption applicable to the information under section 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the `Freedom of Information Act').”

To increase the supply of housing in America, and for other purposes, Sec. 905

The section provides that a federal banking agency giving information under the new paragraph does not thereby waive, destroy, or affect any privilege applying to it, or waive any exemption under the Freedom of Information Act. Privilege here covers work-product, attorney-client, and any other privilege recognized under federal or State law.

What the document actually says

“``(I) waiving, destroying, or otherwise affecting any privilege applicable to the information; or ``(II) waiving any exemption applicable to the information under section 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the `Freedom of Information Act').”

To increase the supply of housing in America, and for other purposes, Sec. 905
That sentence, in plain words

Handing over the papers does not give up any legal shield. It does not give up an exemption under the open records law.

What this is about

Some records are shielded from being used against a party. Sharing them with Congress could break that shield. This says it does not.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shallWho acts: Federal banking agenciesHow: statuteSec. 905 in the PDF
What the document says

“A Federal banking agency shall publish materials contained in a report required under subparagraph (A) to the fullest extent possible to promote transparency.”

To increase the supply of housing in America, and for other purposes, Sec. 905

The section requires a federal banking agency to publish the materials in the report as fully as possible. Where it decides particular materials should not be published, it must consult the chair and ranking member of the House Committee on Financial Services and of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, and where after that it finds a substantial public interest in not publishing them, it must give those materials to both committees with a written explanation of its reasons.

What the document actually says

“A Federal banking agency shall publish materials contained in a report required under subparagraph (A) to the fullest extent possible to promote transparency.”

To increase the supply of housing in America, and for other purposes, Sec. 905
That sentence, in plain words

The agency must publish what is in the report. It must publish as much as it possibly can. The aim is to let the public see.

What this is about

The agency may hold something back. First it must talk to four members of Congress. Then it must hand the material to both committees with its reasons in writing.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “canWho acts: Federal banking agenciesHow: statuteSec. 905 in the PDF
What the document says

“A Federal banking agency may extend a deadline described under subparagraph (A) for an additional 60 days, if the Federal banking agency-- ``(i) faces ongoing circumstances that require the Federal banking agency to prioritize activities to promote stability of the United States banking system; and”

To increase the supply of housing in America, and for other purposes, Sec. 905

The section lets a federal banking agency extend a report deadline by 60 days where ongoing circumstances require it to prioritize work promoting the stability of the banking system, and it notifies Congress of the extension and the reasons. An agency may also consolidate several reports so long as each still meets its timing requirement, and nothing in the paragraph limits any agency's power to enforce federal law.

What the document actually says

“A Federal banking agency may extend a deadline described under subparagraph (A) for an additional 60 days, if the Federal banking agency-- ``(i) faces ongoing circumstances that require the Federal banking agency to prioritize activities to promote stability of the United States banking system; and”

To increase the supply of housing in America, and for other purposes, Sec. 905
That sentence, in plain words

The agency may take another 60 days. It may do that when it must first steady the banking system.

What this is about

A crisis can leave no staff free to write a report. The agency must tell Congress it is taking longer. It must also give its reasons.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

What This Page Covers, and What It Leaves Out

The two things the section does: the rewritten review by the Comptroller General with the eight matters it must cover, and the new report by the appropriate federal banking agency with its disclosure duties, privilege protections, transparency rules, extension, consolidation, and rule of construction.

Nothing the section does is left out.

The section works by amending section 13(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, which is not indexed here, so nothing is recorded about when a systemic risk determination is made under clause (i) or what follows from it.