Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 7 › Proposal

Divert CIA resources away from what the chapter calls social engineering

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 7, p. 209. Written by Dustin J. Carmack.

Divert CIA resources away from what the chapter calls social engineering

The document says “should”Who acts: CIAHow: internal managementp. 209 in the PDF
What the document says

“the Director should divert resources from any activities that promote unnecessary and distracting social engineering.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 209

The chapter states that certain employees and offices have focused on promoting what it calls divisive ideological or cultural agendas and fostering a culture of risk aversion. It asks that promotion criteria change and that officers willing to accept high risk be rewarded over those advancing by routine.

What the document actually says

“the Director should divert resources from any activities that promote unnecessary and distracting social engineering.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 209
That sentence, in plain words

Some work pushes social causes. The Director should move money away from it.

What this is about

The book says some staff work on social causes. It says that is a distraction. It wants the money moved to other work.

What has happened
Partly matches

Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing

2025-01-20 · 90 FR 8339

Executive Order 14151 terminates diversity, equity and inclusion offices, positions, programs and equity related grants and contracts across the executive branch, which moves resources away from the activities the chapter describes, and its section 2(a) requires federal employment practices, including performance reviews, to reward individual initiative, skills, performance and hard work and never to consider those factors, which touches the promotion criteria the chapter raises in the same passage. It is not addressed to the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, names no intelligence agency or directorate, and says nothing about rewarding officers who accept high risk or about the risk aversion the chapter treats as the other half of the problem.

In plain English

The order ends DEI offices, jobs and grants across the branch. That moves money away from such work. It also says hiring and reviews must reward skill and hard work alone. But it is not aimed at the spy chief and names no spy agency. It says nothing about rewarding officers who take on risk.

What cites those orders

8 agency rules

Each of these names the order above in its own summary, preamble or filing. That is a fact about the document, not a finding that it carries out this proposal: it is one step further away than the order is, and what it does about the proposal is a reading nobody has made here.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 209.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Divert CIA resources away from what the chapter calls social engineering,” Project 2025, chapter 7, p. 209. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch07-divert-from-social-engineering/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →