Read theMandate

Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2025Section 4 › Proposal

A comma is struck from section 205(c)(1)

To extend the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000, section 4, Sec. 4. Written by .

A comma is struck from section 205(c)(1)

The document says “is amendedWho acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 4 in the PDF
What the document says

“in paragraph (1), by striking ``concerned,'' and inserting ``concerned''”

To extend the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000, Sec. 4

The section amends paragraph (1) of section 205(c) of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (16 U.S.C. 7125), striking the word concerned followed by a comma and inserting the same word without the comma.

What the document actually says

“in paragraph (1), by striking ``concerned,'' and inserting ``concerned''”

To extend the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000, Sec. 4
That sentence, in plain words

One word had a comma after it. The comma is taken out. The word stays.

What this is about

This is a fix to the way the old law is printed. The Act calls these technical corrections. A comma is not a rule.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →