This part fixes small printing errors in an older law. It takes out a stray comma in two places. It puts back a missing word. It swaps a vague phrase for a real date.
The document says “is amended”Who acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 4 in the PDF
What the document says
“in paragraph (1), by striking ``concerned,'' and inserting ``concerned''”
The section amends paragraph (1) of section 205(c) of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (16 U.S.C. 7125), striking the word concerned followed by a comma and inserting the same word without the comma.
What the document actually says
“in paragraph (1), by striking ``concerned,'' and inserting ``concerned''”
That sentence, in plain words
One word had a comma after it. The comma is taken out. The word stays.
What this is about
This is a fix to the way the old law is printed. The Act calls these technical corrections. A comma is not a rule.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
The document says “is amended”Who acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 4 in the PDF
What the document says
“in paragraph (3), by striking ``the date of the enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``October 3, 2008''”
The section amends paragraph (3) of section 205(c) of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000, striking the phrase the date of the enactment of this Act and inserting the date October 3, 2008.
What the document actually says
“in paragraph (3), by striking ``the date of the enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``October 3, 2008''”
That sentence, in plain words
The old law said the date this Act was passed. Now it names a day. The day is October 3, 2008.
What this is about
The old words did not give a day. The new words do. A reader can now look the day up.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
The document says “is amended”Who acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 4 in the PDF
What the document says
“in subsection (d)(4), by striking ``to extent'' and inserting ``to the extent''.”
The section amends section 205(d)(4) of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000, striking the words to extent and inserting to the extent.
What the document actually says
“in subsection (d)(4), by striking ``to extent'' and inserting ``to the extent''.”
That sentence, in plain words
The old law said to extent. Now it says to the extent. One small word is put back.
What this is about
A word was left out when the old law was printed. This puts it back. The Act calls these technical corrections.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
The document says “is amended”Who acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 4 in the PDF
What the document says
“is amended by striking ``concerned,'' and inserting ``concerned''.”
The section amends section 206(b)(2) of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (16 U.S.C. 7126(b)(2)), striking the word concerned followed by a comma and inserting the same word without the comma. The heading the Act gives this subsection is use of project funds.
What the document actually says
“is amended by striking ``concerned,'' and inserting ``concerned''.”
That sentence, in plain words
Here too the word had a comma. The comma is taken out. The word stays.
What this is about
This is the same fix as the one before it. It sits in another part of the old law. The Act calls it use of project funds.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
Each of the four corrections the section makes: the comma struck in section 205(c)(1), the date written into section 205(c)(3), the missing word added in section 205(d)(4), and the comma struck in section 206(b)(2).
Nothing else. The section makes four changes and all four are recorded here.
The section works by amending sections 205 and 206 of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000, which is not indexed here. Nothing here records what the corrected sentences say around the words changed.
