Read theMandate

Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2025Section 4 › Proposal

A comma is struck from section 206(b)(2)

To extend the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000, section 4, Sec. 4. Written by .

A comma is struck from section 206(b)(2)

The document says “is amendedWho acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 4 in the PDF
What the document says

“is amended by striking ``concerned,'' and inserting ``concerned''.”

To extend the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000, Sec. 4

The section amends section 206(b)(2) of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (16 U.S.C. 7126(b)(2)), striking the word concerned followed by a comma and inserting the same word without the comma. The heading the Act gives this subsection is use of project funds.

What the document actually says

“is amended by striking ``concerned,'' and inserting ``concerned''.”

To extend the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000, Sec. 4
That sentence, in plain words

Here too the word had a comma. The comma is taken out. The word stays.

What this is about

This is the same fix as the one before it. It sits in another part of the old law. The Act calls it use of project funds.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →