Including Food Allergy Information in Existing Training Modules for Local Food Service Personnel
Section 3 · Sec. 3 ·
What this chapter is about
This part changes an older law about training. People who serve food at school get that training. The training must now cover food allergies. A second change makes one pointer in that law point to two spots.
The document says “is amended”Who acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 3 in the PDF
What the document says
“``(II) food allergies, including information on the best practices”
Section 3(a) amends section 7(g)(2)(B)(iii) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1776(g)(2)(B)(iii)) by inserting a new subclause (II) after subclause (I). The new subclause covers food allergies, including information on the best practices to prevent, recognize, and respond to food-related allergic reactions. The subclauses that were numbered (II) and (III) are renumbered (III) and (IV) to make room for it.
What the document actually says
“``(II) food allergies, including information on the best practices”
That sentence, in plain words
The new words add food allergies to a list. They cover the best ways to deal with them.
What this is about
The list is what a training course must cover. The rest of the new sentence names three things. They are how to stop a bad reaction to food, how to spot one, and what to do.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
The document says “is amended”Who acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 3 in the PDF
What the document says
“Section 7(g)(2)(B)(ii)(II) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1776(g)(2)(B)(ii)(II)) is amended by striking ``clause (i)'' and inserting ``clauses (i) and (iii)''.”
Section 3(b) amends section 7(g)(2)(B)(ii)(II) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1776(g)(2)(B)(ii)(II)) by striking a reference to clause (i) and inserting a reference to clauses (i) and (iii). What that provision requires is not recorded here, because the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 is not indexed on this site.
What the document actually says
“Section 7(g)(2)(B)(ii)(II) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1776(g)(2)(B)(ii)(II)) is amended by striking ``clause (i)'' and inserting ``clauses (i) and (iii)''.”
That sentence, in plain words
A pointer in an older law now points to two spots, not one.
What this is about
The heading of this part calls it certification. What that part holds is not on this site.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
The two things section 3 does: the new subclause on food allergies that subsection (a) inserts into the training provision of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966, and the change of cross reference that subsection (b) makes.
The redesignation of subclauses (II) and (III) as (III) and (IV) is recorded in the entry below rather than on its own, because it does no more than make room for the new subclause.
Section 3 works entirely by amending section 7(g)(2)(B) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1776(g)(2)(B)). That statute is not indexed on this site, so what the training provision otherwise requires, and who it reaches, is not recorded here. One quotation stops short of the end of the inserted sentence because the printed line breaks a word.
