Read theMandate
Menu

Documents › Subjects › Crime and Policing

Subject

Crime and Policing

What this site holds on crime and policing, taken from every part of it: the chapters of Project 2025 assigned to this subject, the actions recorded against those proposals, every order, presidential document, agency rule and public law whose own title carries one of this subject's words, and the measures the chamber voted on that the site already groups under it.

In plain English

This page is about crime and policing.

It gathers what the site holds on it. Parts of the book. Orders and rules. Laws. Votes in Congress.

Most things are here because a word from a short list is in the title. That list is at the foot of the page.

31
proposals
14
actions recorded
13
executive orders
11
other documents
3
agency rules
2
public laws
15
measures voted on

What Project 2025 proposes

Every proposal indexed from chapter 5 (Department of Homeland Security) and chapter 17 (Department of Justice). A proposal in another chapter that touches this subject is not here.

What has happened against those proposals

Actions this site has already recorded against the proposals above, with the note that says how far each one goes. Nothing new is matched here: every pairing is the one on the proposal's own page.

Recorded against 2 proposals here

Restoring Freedom of Speech and Ending Federal Censorship

January 20, 2025 · 90 FR 8243

  • End the cyber agency's work on misinformation: partly matches. The order bars every federal department, agency, officer, employee and agent from acting or using federal resources in a way that would unconstitutionally abridge an American citizen's speech, names work carried out under the heading of misinformation, disinformation and malinformation as what it is reversing, and directs the Attorney General to investigate the previous four years of such activity and recommend remedies. It reaches the cyber agency only as one agency among all of them: CISA is never named, no program of the agency is closed by the order, the Cybersecurity Advisory Committee is not dismissed, work against foreign actors is not moved to the Intelligence Community, and what is prohibited is conduct that would be unconstitutional rather than the subject matter itself.
  • Prohibit the FBI from working on misinformation: partly matches. Executive Order 14149 of January 20, 2025 states that the federal government infringed protected speech under the guise of combatting misinformation, disinformation and malinformation, bars every federal department, agency, officer, employee and agent from acting or spending federal resources in a way that would unconstitutionally abridge an American citizen's speech or facilitate such conduct, and directs the Attorney General to investigate the previous four years and recommend remedies. The prohibition is government-wide and covers the activity the chapter names. It breaks down on scope and on line-drawing: the order names no agency, so it neither singles out the FBI nor ends any identified FBI program, and it forbids only conduct that would be unconstitutional rather than setting the chapter's firewall between monitoring online activity for evidence of crime and asking a publisher to remove material.
Recorded against 2 proposals here

Protecting the American People Against Invasion

January 20, 2025 · 90 FR 8443

  • Make border security, detention and deportation the department's priority: partly matches. The order sets the priority the chapter asks for. Section 2 makes total and efficient enforcement of the immigration laws, including detention, the policy of the United States; section 4 directs the Secretary to enable ICE, CBP and USCIS to set enforcement priorities and makes enforcement against illegal entry and unlawful presence the primary mission of Homeland Security Investigations; section 10 directs all legally available resources toward detention facilities. The structural half of the proposal is absent: the order does not reorganize the department, does not change its size or budget, and does not shift resources from supporting components to operational ones.
  • Halt federal funding to NGOs that process or transport migrants: partly matches. Section 19 directs the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security to review and, if appropriate, audit all contracts, grants and other agreements providing federal funding to non-governmental organizations supporting or providing services, directly or indirectly, to removable or illegal aliens, to pause distribution of all further funds under those agreements pending the review, to terminate any found to violate law or to be sources of waste, fraud or abuse, to prohibit future ones, to coordinate with the Office of Management and Budget so that no such funding appears in appropriations requests, and to start clawback where appropriate. The chapter asks Congress to halt the funds. This is executive action inside existing appropriations, and the terminations turn on a finding about a particular agreement rather than on the processing or transport of aliens as such. The order also does not redirect the money to border security, detention or space for immigration court proceedings, and it does not mention the department's joint processing centers.
Closely matches

Restoring the Death Penalty and Protecting Public Safety

January 20, 2025 · 90 FR 8463

Partly matches

Securing Our Borders

January 20, 2025 · 90 FR 8467

  • Change detention in law from may to shall: partly matches. Section 5 directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to detain, to the fullest extent permitted by law, aliens apprehended for immigration violations until their removal, and to issue policy guidance or propose regulations on consistent use of detention authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act, including terminating the practice commonly known as catch and release. Section 2(c) states the same as policy. The result sought is the same as the passage seeks, but by the route the passage identifies as the problem: the direction operates inside existing discretion, is expressly bounded by what the law permits, and amends no statute, so the discretionary language the passage wants replaced remains and a later Secretary could read it differently.
Partly matches

Clarifying the Military's Role in Protecting the Territorial Integrity of the United States

January 20, 2025 · 90 FR 8613

  • Consider using active-duty military for arrests at the border: partly matches. Executive Order 14167 of January 20, 2025 assigns United States Northern Command the mission to seal the borders and repel what it calls forms of invasion, including unlawful mass migration, narcotics trafficking, and human smuggling, and adds Level 3 and campaign planning requirements for that mission. Active-duty forces are put to border work, which is the first half of what the chapter raises. It breaks down on the specific step the chapter says has not yet been tried: the order says nothing about arrest operations, does not mention the National Guard, and does not address the Posse Comitatus limits that stand between a military presence and military arrests.
Partly matches

Guaranteeing the States Protection Against Invasion

January 20, 2025 · 90 FR 8333

  • Create an emergency power to bar entry, exempt from normal rulemaking: partly matches. The proclamation finds an ongoing invasion at the southern border and, under sections 212(f) and 215(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act together with claimed inherent Article II authority, suspends the entry of aliens engaged in it, restricts those aliens from invoking provisions of the Act that would permit their continued presence including the asylum provision at section 208, and directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to repel, repatriate or remove them, none of it through notice and comment. That is close to the substance of the power the chapter drafts. It is not the statute the chapter asks Congress to pass: the determination and the power sit with the President rather than the Secretary, the trigger is an invasion at the southern border rather than a mass migration en route to or arriving off the coast, no countries or places are designated, nothing authorizes waiver of any requirement of Title 8, and because the instrument is a proclamation rather than a rule there is no rulemaking for the Administrative Procedure Act exemption to apply to.
Partly matches

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to take into custody aliens who have been charged in the United States with theft, and for other purposes

January 29, 2025 · 139 Stat. 3

  • Change detention in law from may to shall: partly matches. Section 2 adds a new subparagraph (E) to section 236(c)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, the list of aliens who must be taken into custody, covering those inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(A), (6)(C) or (7) who are charged with, arrested for, convicted of or admit burglary, theft, larceny, shoplifting, assault of a law enforcement officer, or a crime resulting in death or serious bodily injury, and provides that the Secretary of Homeland Security shall issue a detainer and take custody. Section 3 strikes the words or release from section 236(e). Congress is replacing discretion with a duty, by statute, which is the instrument and the direction the passage names. It is one added class rather than the general change described: the discretionary language of section 236(a) stands, and the rest of Title 8 is untouched.
Partly matches

Implementing the President's "Department of Government Efficiency" Workforce Optimization Initiative

February 11, 2025 · 90 FR 9669

  • Soft close parts of DHS pending a decision to shrink or dismantle it: partly matches. The order tells every agency head, the Secretary of Homeland Security included, to prepare large scale reductions in force and to prioritize in them all offices performing functions not mandated by statute, all diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, and any component the administration suspends or closes, while hiring is held to one for every four departures. Functions related to public safety, immigration enforcement and law enforcement are exempt from both the ratio and the reductions, which is the shift toward operational components the chapter describes. The route is not the chapter's: this is a presidential order applying across the government rather than the Secretary using discretionary leadership authority on particular corners of the department, it names no Homeland Security office, and it does not tie any closure to shrinking or dismantling the department.
Partly matches

Achieving Efficiency Through State and Local Preparedness

March 18, 2025 · 90 FR 13267

  • Return the cyber agency to a narrow mission: partly matches. Section 3(b) orders a review of all critical infrastructure policies and states that for purposes of the order those policies do not include any related to purported misinformation, disinformation or malinformation, nor so-called cognitive infrastructure, which is the work the chapter says drew the agency away from its statutory mission, and the order's stated policy is that preparedness be owned at the state, local and individual level. The order never names the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. It reaches critical infrastructure policy across the government rather than one agency's mission and funding, it moves no emergency communications, chemical facility or school security function to the Federal Emergency Management Agency or to the states as the chapter proposes, it says nothing about duplication of work at the Defense Department, the Federal Bureau of Investigation or the National Security Agency, and it commissions recommendations to the President rather than making the change itself.
Partly matches

Exclusions From Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs

March 27, 2025 · 90 FR 14553

  • Classify USCIS as national security sensitive and decertify its union: partly matches. Executive Order 14251 determines that a list of agencies and subdivisions, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services among them, have as a primary function intelligence, counterintelligence, investigative or national security work, and that chapter 71 of title 5 cannot be applied to them consistently with national security requirements. It adds the agency to the exclusions from the Federal Labor-Management Relations Program, which ends collective bargaining there. That is the national security classification and the end of union representation the chapter asks for, reached through the labor relations statute rather than through decertification, and the determination attaches to the agency rather than to each employee's position. The rest of the proposal is untouched: nothing about investigating and punishing leaks, nothing about separating employees who cannot meet those standards, and nothing about keeping the Washington presence skeletal or rotating staff to field offices. Among the listed candidates, Executive Order 14343 makes further exclusions of the same kind but does not reach this agency, and the codification rule gives certain of its officers arrest and firearms authority without changing its classification.
Partly matches

Protecting American Communities From Criminal Aliens

April 28, 2025 · 90 FR 18761

  • Penalise sanctuary jurisdictions financially: partly matches. The order does the financial part by executive action. Section 2 requires the Attorney General, with the Secretary of Homeland Security, to publish and update a list of states and local jurisdictions that obstruct enforcement of federal immigration law and to notify each of them; section 3 requires every agency head, working with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, to identify federal funds going to those jurisdictions, including grants and contracts, for suspension or termination, and directs legal remedies against jurisdictions that do not comply. What the chapter asks Congress to do is not done: nothing here requires compliance with immigration detainers, the penalties rest on agency discretion under existing law rather than on a statute that sets them, and the authorization of state and local police to enforce immigration law is not in this order, though Executive Order 14159 separately expands agreements under section 287(g).
Recorded against 3 proposals here

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14

July 4, 2025 · 139 Stat. 72

  • Fund at least 20,000 deportation officers: partly matches. Section 100052 of the reconciliation act appropriates $29,850,000,000 to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for fiscal year 2025, available through September 30, 2029, and the first of its eleven named purposes is hiring and training more officers, agents, investigators and support staff, with performance, retention and signing bonuses attached to written service agreements. Congress funded the hiring the chapter asked it to fund. It set no number: the law does not require 20,000 Enforcement and Removal Operations officers, does not single out that division, and leaves the resulting size of the force to how the agency spends the money.
  • Fund 100,000 immigration detention beds: partly matches. Section 90003 appropriates $45,000,000,000 to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for fiscal year 2025, available until September 30, 2029, for single adult detention capacity and family residential center capacity. That is the funded increase in detention space the chapter asked Congress to mandate. The law sets no target: 100,000 daily beds appears nowhere in it, the number of beds the money buys is left to the agency, and the section adds terms for how long families may be held that the proposal does not raise. Executive Order 14159, also among the candidates, directs the Secretary to use all legally available resources for detention facilities but appropriates nothing.
  • End the Flores settlement on detention of children: partly matches. Section 90003 provides that aliens may be detained at family residential centers pending a decision on removal and, where removal is ordered, until they are removed; defines a family residential center as a facility used to detain family units including children who are not unaccompanied; and leaves detention standards for single adult capacity to the Secretary. That is Congress setting a term for family detention in statute, which is the route the chapter proposes. It is not the end of the settlement the chapter asks for: the Flores Settlement Agreement is not named or terminated, no nationwide housing standards are set, unaccompanied children are not covered, and the large scale temporary facilities the chapter has in mind are not mentioned.
Partly matches

Additional Measures To Address the Crime Emergency in the District of Columbia

August 25, 2025 · 90 FR 42121

  • Bring federal charges where local prosecutors decline to: partly matches. Executive Order 14339 of August 25, 2025 puts more federal law enforcement into a jurisdiction the order says has lost control of crime: the Park Police are to hire in the District of Columbia and enforce the DC Code, the United States Attorney for the District is to hire prosecutors focused on violent and property crime, and a specialized federal unit is created that the order says could be deployed in other cities where public safety and order has been lost. That answers the chapter's call for a greater federal law enforcement presence where local authorities are said to have abdicated. The fit breaks down on the proposal's actual instruction: the order does not direct anyone to bring federal charges against criminals whom local prosecutors declined to charge. It rests on a declared crime emergency in the capital and the Home Rule Act rather than on a general charging policy, and deployment to any other city is contingent.
Runs the other way

Exercise of Time-Limited Authority To Increase the Fiscal Year 2026 Numerical Limitation for the H-2B Temporary Nonagricultural Worker Program

February 3, 2026 · 91 FR 5040

  • Refuse to raise the seasonal worker visa cap: runs the other way. The chapter asks the Secretary to state that the discretionary authority to raise the H-2B cap will not be used. This rule uses it: the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Labor, made up to 64,716 supplemental visas available for fiscal year 2026, released in three allocations by the employer's start date of need. The reversal is bounded rather than total: the supplemental visas go only to businesses attesting that they face permanent and severe financial loss, the authority is time limited to one fiscal year and must be exercised again to have effect the next, and the chapter's separate request that no regulation support the eligible country list is not addressed here.

Executive orders

Orders whose title carries one of this subject's words. The word is printed beside each one.

Proclamations, memoranda and the rest

Everything else the President signed whose title carries one of these words.

Agency rules

Final rules that name an executive order indexed here and whose title carries one of these words.

Public laws

Public laws of this Congress whose short title carries one of these words.

Roll call votes

Measures the House or Senate took a final vote on, kept in the grouping the site already publishes at how votes are grouped, which covers final-passage questions only.

How This Subject Is Put Together

The grouping is this site's reading, not anybody else's. Two rules decide what is on this page, and both of them can be checked against the thing they were read from.

The chapters. The proposals above are every proposal indexed from chapter 5 (Department of Homeland Security) and chapter 17 (Department of Justice). Each chapter is assigned to the subjects the agencies and the matter it covers belong to. The whole table, all thirty chapters, is on the subjects page.

The words. An order, a presidential document, a rule or a law is here because one of these words appears in its own title, and the word that matched is printed beside it: crime criminal police law enforcement sentence sentencing bail offender trafficking fentanyl prosecut death penalty cartel

A word in a title is a fact about the title. It is not a finding that the document is about this subject: a title can carry a word in another sense, and where it does the document is still listed, with the word shown, so the reader can see what put it there. The reverse also happens. A document about this subject whose title happens to use none of these words is not on this page, and the way to find it is the document index or the search.

Nothing here says whether an action carries a proposal out. Where this site has recorded a match between a proposal and an action, the match and its note are the ones already on the proposal's own page. Where it has not, no match is made here.

Share this page