Project 2025 › What has happened
What has happened
Actions taken since 2025-01-20 that bear on a
proposal indexed from Project 2025.
23 actions recorded.
A record here means an action addresses the subject of a proposal. It is not a claim that
the document caused the action, and this site makes no such claim.
What this page showsThe book asked for a lot of things. Here is what the government has really done
since January 2025.
Each item below is a real order. We show the date and where to read it. Nothing here is made
up or guessed.
Be careful about one thing. An order may match a plan in the book. That does not prove the
book caused it. We do not say that it did.
What a match means
Closely matches
The action does what the proposal asked for.
Partly matches
The action addresses part of the proposal, or addresses it less directly.
Same subject, different route
The action addresses the same subject by a route the document did not propose.
Contested reading
Whether this action answers the proposal is a reading, and the site does not resolve it.
Runs the other way
The action runs contrary to what the document proposed.
2026-06-03
Executive Order 14410 · 91 FR 34893
Amends: EO 13562, December 27, 2010; EO 13957, October 21, 2020; EO 14171, January 20, 2025; EO 14217, February 19, 2025.
States that Executive Order 13957 as amended by Executive Order 14171 created Schedule Policy/Career, that such positions are filled on merit and not political affiliation, and that they are exempted from the adverse action procedures that apply to other career positions. The order transfers senior policy-influencing positions into the schedule and amends the Civil Service Rules to implement it.
In plain English
This later order carried the same plan further. It moved senior workers whose jobs shape policy into the new group. The order says they are still hired on merit. It also says the usual rules that make firing hard do not apply to them.
Recorded against
Closely matches
chapter 3, p. 81 · the document says
“should”
Carries the reinstated schedule into effect and transfers positions into it. This goes beyond what the chapter asked for, which was reinstatement of the 2020 order; the chapter did not propose the transfer mechanism this order uses.
2025-10-15
Executive Order 14356 · 90 FR 48387
See: EO 14170, January 20, 2025; EO 14210, February 11, 2025.
Continues hiring controls established by Executive Orders 14170 and 14210.
In plain English
This order kept the hiring limits going.
Recorded against
Partly matches
chapter 3, p. 79 · the document says
“is needed”
Continues government-wide hiring controls rather than the targeted freeze on top career positions that the chapter proposed.
2025-08-28
Executive Order 14343 · 90 FR 42683
Amends: EO 12171, November 19, 1979. See: EO 14251, March 27, 2025.
Further amends Executive Order 12171 to exclude additional agency subdivisions from the federal labor-management relations program.
In plain English
A later order added more agencies to that same list.
Recorded against
Same subject, different route
chapter 3, p. 82 · the document says
“should”
Extends the approach taken in Executive Order 14251. The same distinction applies: the chapter asked for the three 2018 orders to be reinstated, not for agencies to be excluded from the program.
2025-07-30
Executive Order 14324 · 90 FR 37775
Supersedes: EO 14256, April 2, 2025 (in part) See: EO 14193, February 1, 2025; EO 14194, EO 14195, February 1, 2025; February 1, 2025; EO 14200, February 5, 2025; EO 14226, March 2, 2025; EO 14227, March 2, 2025; EO 14257, April 2, 2025; EO 14289, April 29, 2025; Notice of March 24, 2026 (91 FR 15517) Amended by: EO 14388, February 20, 2026
Suspends duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) for all countries, extending suspensions previously applied to specific countries.
In plain English
Small parcels used to come in without duty. That break has ended.
Recorded against
Partly matches
chapter 26, p. 789 · the document says
“should consider”
One item on the first essay's list was ending what it called China's abuse of the de minimis exemption for parcels under $800. This order suspends that treatment for all countries rather than for China specifically, and the essay's other listed measures are separate.
2025-04-24
Executive Order 14284 · 90 FR 17729
Requires agency certification that a probationer will be an asset to the government before the employee becomes tenured, and provides that employment terminates at the end of the probationary period absent that certification, citing a 2005 Merit Systems Protection Board report.
In plain English
New government workers get a trial period. This order says a boss must sign off before that worker becomes permanent. Without that sign-off the job ends.
Recorded against
Partly matches
chapter 3, p. 73 · the document says
“will need to”
Shares the chapter's subject of removing poor performers, and the chapter's list of Executive Order 13839's requirements includes reminding supervisors of expiring probationary periods. This order goes further than that item by making tenure conditional on affirmative agency certification, which the chapter did not propose.
2025-04-23
Executive Order 14281 · 90 FR 17537
See: EO 12250, November 2, 1980.
States that disparate-impact liability holds that a presumption of unlawful discrimination exists where there are differences in outcomes among groups even without a facially discriminatory practice or discriminatory intent, and sets the policy of eliminating its use.
In plain English
One rule said a test can count as unfair if fewer people from one group pass it. It did not matter what anyone meant to do. This order set out to stop the government using that rule.
Recorded against
Closely matches
chapter 3, p. 72 · the document says
“could”
The chapter raised ending or narrowing disparate impact as a possibility rather than a recommendation: 'could be ended legislatively or at least narrowed through the regulatory process'. This order acts by the executive route on the narrower of the two. The chapter's framing was conditional, so a reader should not treat this as an implemented plank.
2025-04-02
Executive Order 14257 · 90 FR 15041
See: Proc. 9704, March 8, 2018; Proc. 9705, March 8, 2018; Proc. 9980, January 24, 2020; Memo. of January 20, 2025; EO 14193, February 1, 2025; EO 14194, February 1, 2025; EO 14197, February 3, 2025; EO 14198, February 3, 2025; Proc. 10895, February 10, 2025; Proc. 10896, February 10, 2025; Memo. of February 13, 2025; EO 14227, March 2, 2025; EO 14231, March 2, 2025; Proc. 10908, March 26, 2025; EO 14256, April 2, 2025; EO 14259, April 8, 2025; EO 14266, April 9, 2025; EO 14298, May 12, 2025; EO 14309, June 16, 2025; EO 14316, July 7, 2025; Proc. 10962, July 30, 2025; EO 14323, July 30, 2025;
Section 1 declares a national emergency arising from persistent goods trade deficits, which the order states reached $1.2 trillion in 2024, and imposes tariffs described as reciprocal, citing non-reciprocal tariff rates and non-tariff barriers.
In plain English
This order put new taxes on goods coming in. It says other countries charge us more than we charge them.
Recorded against
Same subject, different route
chapter 26, p. 770 · the document says
“should”
Same subject, different instrument. The first essay asked Congress to pass the United States Reciprocal Trade Act, giving the President authority to mirror a partner's tariffs after negotiation. This order proceeds instead by declaring a national emergency under existing authority, without the statute the essay asked Congress to enact.
Runs the other way
chapter 26, p. 803 · the document says
“should”
The chapter's second essay argues the opposite of this action: that tariffs have backfired, that the reform is to remove those enacted since 2017 and build safeguards against future use, and that the next President should ignore those seeking protection. The chapter contains both positions and resolves neither.
2025-03-27
Executive Order 14251 · 90 FR 14553
Amends: EO 12171, November 19, 1979. See: EO 14343, August 28, 2025.
Determines that listed agencies and subdivisions have as a primary function intelligence, counterintelligence, investigative or national security work, and that Chapter 71 of title 5 cannot be applied to them consistently with national security requirements. Amends Executive Order 12171 to add them to the list of excluded agencies, which include the Departments of State, Defense and the Treasury with stated exceptions.
In plain English
Most federal workers can join a union. The union can then bargain for them. But a law lets the president take that right away. He can do it where the work involves security. This order did that at a long list of agencies. The list includes State, Defense, and the Treasury.
Recorded against
Same subject, different route
chapter 3, p. 82 · the document says
“should”
Same subject, different instrument, and much wider. The chapter asked for three 2018 orders to be reinstated. Those orders regulated how agencies bargain, how official time is used, and how grievances are handled, while leaving bargaining rights in place. This order instead invokes the national security exclusion in 5 U.S.C. 7103(b) to remove listed agencies from the labor-management relations program altogether. Chapter 3 does not propose that mechanism. It does say Congress should consider whether public-sector unions are appropriate at all, which is a separate proposal indexed here.
Contested reading
chapter 3, p. 82 · the document says
“should consider”
Whether this order answers the chapter's question is a reading, not a fact. The chapter put the question to Congress and proposed no executive action on it; this is executive action, and it removes coverage from named agencies rather than deciding the general question. Recorded here because readers reasonably connect the two, and left unresolved.
2025-03-20
Executive Order 14242 · 90 FR 13679
Section 1 states that closure of the Department of Education would improve program implementation and that the department must return what it calls bank functions to an entity equipped to serve students, noting a student loan portfolio of more than $1.6 trillion managed by fewer than 1,500 staff.
In plain English
This order says the Education Department should close. Only Congress can close it. So the order tells staff to work toward it.
Recorded against
Partly matches
chapter 11, p. 319 · the document says
“should”
Shares the chapter's central aim. The chapter said plainly that eliminating the department requires Congress to pass a Department of Education Reorganization Act. An executive order cannot abolish a department created by statute, so this directs steps toward closure rather than achieving it.
Partly matches
chapter 11, p. 320 · the document says
“should”
Addresses the chapter's subject of returning control to states. Whether it produces the no-strings block grants the chapter asked for is not established by the order alone.
2025-02-11
Executive Order 14210 · 90 FR 9669
See: EO 14158, January 20, 2025; EO 14170, January 20, 2025; Presidential Memorandum, January 20, 2025; EO 14356, October 15, 2025.
Directs agency heads, working with DOGE Team Leads, to undertake reductions in force and to limit hiring, with exemptions including immigration enforcement, law enforcement and national security.
In plain English
This order told agencies to cut jobs and slow down hiring. Some jobs were left out, such as police and border work.
Recorded against
Partly matches
chapter 3, p. 79 · the document says
“should”
Directs reductions in force, which is the subject of the chapter's proposal. The chapter's specific ask was to change the order of retention so that performance outranks tenure, veterans' preference and seniority, a change it noted had repeatedly failed as legislation. This order directs reductions; it is not established here that it reorders retention factors.
Partly matches
chapter 3, p. 79 · the document says
“is needed”
Limits hiring across agencies. The chapter proposed something narrower and differently aimed: a freeze on top career positions specifically, to stop outgoing political appointees converting into career jobs. The chapter separately warned that broad hiring freezes and buyouts have not produced lasting reductions and can raise costs.
2025-01-31
Executive Order 14192 · 90 FR 9065
See: EO 12866, September 30, 1993; EO 14265, April 9, 2025; EO 14269, April 9, 2025; EO 14270, April 9, 2025; EO 14275, April 15, 2025
Directs agencies to repeal existing regulations when issuing new ones and establishes a cost accounting approach to the regulatory budget.
In plain English
For each new rule, agencies must scrap old ones. The idea is fewer rules overall.
Recorded against
Partly matches
chapter 2, p. 49 · the document says
“should”
The chapter asked for eight named Trump-era regulatory orders to be reinstated, of which Executive Order 13771 established the repeal-for-issuance approach. This order re-establishes that approach rather than reinstating the named orders as a set.
2025-01-29
Executive Order 14191 · 90 FR 8859
Section 1 states that geographically assigned schools fail many children and notes that more than a dozen states have enacted universal K-12 scholarship programs allowing families rather than government to choose the setting.
In plain English
This order pushes for families to pick their child's school. Money would follow the child.
Recorded against
Partly matches
chapter 11, p. 319 · the document says
“should”
Addresses the chapter's subject of letting parents direct their child's share of education funding. The chapter's proposal was for education savings accounts funded overwhelmingly by state and local taxpayers, which is a matter for states; this order works on the federal levers available to it.
2025-01-27
Executive Order 14183 · 90 FR 8757
See: EO 14148, January 20, 2025; EO 14168, January 20, 2025 Revokes: EO 14004, January 25, 2021
Section 2 states that the policy is inconsistent with the medical, surgical and mental health constraints on individuals with gender dysphoria, and with shifting pronoun usage. Section 4 directs the Secretary of Defense to update the medical standards instruction within 60 days.
In plain English
This order changed who may serve in the military. It points to people with gender dysphoria.
Recorded against
Closely matches
chapter 4, p. 104 · the document says
“should”
The chapter asked that policies allowing transgender individuals to serve be reversed. This order directs revision of the medical standards that govern service on those grounds.
Partly matches
chapter 4, p. 103 · the document says
“should”
The chapter went further than reversing the service policy: it asked that those with gender dysphoria be expelled from service. This order directs a change to medical standards; what follows for serving members is not established by the order alone.
2025-01-27
Executive Order 14184 · 90 FR 8761
Section 2 directs the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of Homeland Security to make reinstatement available to members discharged for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine. Section 1 calls the mandate an unfair, overbroad and unnecessary burden and says redress is overdue.
In plain English
Some troops were made to leave for refusing the COVID shot. This order lets them come back.
Recorded against
Closely matches
chapter 4, p. 103 · the document says
“should”
The chapter asked that these servicemembers be reinstated at their appropriate rank with back pay. This order directs that reinstatement be made available. Whether rank and back pay follow in each case is a matter of implementation and is not settled by the order's text.
2025-01-21
Executive Order 14173 · 90 FR 8633
Revokes: EO 11246, September 24, 1965; EO 12898, February 11, 1994; EO 13583, August 18, 2011; EO 13672, July 21, 2014; Memo. of October 5, 2016
The Federal Register records this order as revoking Executive Order 11246 of 1965, which required federal contractors to take affirmative action, along with three other orders. Section 1 states that institutions have adopted race and sex based preferences under the banner of diversity, equity and inclusion.
In plain English
An order from 1965 made firms that sell to the government follow extra hiring rules. This order cancelled it.
Recorded against
Closely matches
chapter 18, p. 584 · the document says
“should”
The chapter asked for Executive Order 11246 to be rescinded, which it said would eliminate the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs. The Federal Register records this order as revoking 11246. The chapter noted contractors would remain bound by statutory nondiscrimination law, which this order does not alter.
2025-01-20
Executive Order 14171 · 90 FR 8625
Reinstates: EO 13957, October 21, 2020. Revokes: EO 14003, January 22, 2021. Amended by: EO 14410, June 3, 2026.
Section 2 reinstates Executive Order 13957, which created Schedule F, subject to amendments made by the order, and revokes Executive Order 14003. The order states that only 41 percent of civil service supervisors are confident they can remove an employee for serious misconduct.
In plain English
This order brought back the Schedule F rule from 2020. It also cancelled the Biden order that had undone it. Workers whose jobs shape policy can now be moved into a group with much less job protection.
Recorded against
Closely matches
chapter 3, p. 81 · the document says
“should”
The chapter asked for Executive Order 13957 to be reinstated, and the Federal Register records this order as reinstating it. The chapter attached a qualification, 'but SES responsibility should come first', and this order does not sequence Senior Executive Service reform ahead of the reinstatement.
2025-01-20
Executive Order 14170 · 90 FR 8621
See: EO 14210, February 11, 2025; EO 14356, October 15, 2025.
Directs the preparation of a Federal Hiring Plan addressing merit-based hiring and the assessment of candidates.
In plain English
This order told the government to write a new plan for hiring. The plan is meant to pick people on skill.
Recorded against
Partly matches
chapter 3, p. 73 · the document says
“must”
Addresses merit hiring and candidate assessment, which is the subject of the chapter's proposal. The chapter's specific ask was that OPM restore testing on knowledge, skills and abilities against the 1981 consent decree and the Uniform Guidelines; whether the hiring plan does that is not established by the order alone.
2025-01-20
Executive Order 14148 · 90 FR 8237
Revokes: EO 13985, January 20, 2021; EO 13986, January 20, 2021; EO 13987, January 20, 2021; EO 13988, January 20, 2021; EO 13989, January 20, 2021; EO 13990, January 20, 2021; EO 13992, January 20, 2021; EO 13993, January 20, 2021; EO 13995, January 21, 2021; EO 13996, January 21, 2021; EO 13997, January 21, 2021; EO 13999, January 21, 2021; EO 14000, January 21, 2021; EO 14002, January 22, 2021; EO 14003, January 22, 2021; EO 14004, January 25, 2021; EO 14006, January 26, 2021; EO 14007, January 27, 2021; EO 14008, January 27, 2021; EO 14009, January 28, 2021; EO 14010, February 2, 2021; EO
Section 1 states the policy of revoking the previous Administration's orders. Its revocation list includes Executive Order 14020, which established the White House Gender Policy Council, along with dozens of others.
In plain English
This order cancelled a long list of orders from the last president. One of them set up the gender council.
Recorded against
Closely matches
chapter 2, p. 62 · the document says
“should”
The chapter asked for Executive Order 14020 to be revoked. The Federal Register records this order as revoking it by name. The chapter also asked for the appointment of an official at Special Assistant rank or higher to lead life and family policy with the Domestic Policy Council; that is a separate step and is not established by this order.
2025-01-20
Executive Order 14154 · 90 FR 8353
Revokes: EO 11991, May 24, 1977; EO 13990, January 20, 2021; EO 13992, January 20, 2021; EO 14008, January 27, 2021; EO 14007, January 27, 2021; EO 14013, February 4, 2021; EO 14027, May 7, 2021; EO 14030, May 20, 2021; EO 14037, August 5, 2021; EO 14057, December 8, 2021; EO 14072, April 22, 2022; EO 14082, September 12, 2022; EO 14096, April 21, 2023 See: Memo. of January 27, 2021; EO 14300, May 23, 2025; EO 14301, May 23, 2025; EO 14303, May 23, 2025
Section 6(b) disbands the Interagency Working Group on the Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases, established under Executive Order 13990, and withdraws its guidance and documents including the February 2021 technical support document. The order also revokes thirteen prior executive orders and directs agencies to use what it calls the most robust methodologies and not ones that are arbitrary or ideologically motivated.
In plain English
This order shut down the group that set the cost of carbon. It also threw out the papers that group had written.
Recorded against
Closely matches
chapter 2, p. 61 · the document says
“should”
The chapter asked that the working group be eliminated and the use of the analysis ended by executive order. The Federal Register text disbands that working group by name and withdraws its documents. The chapter's request covered ending use of the analysis generally, which extends beyond disbanding the group that produced it.
Partly matches
chapter 12, p. 370 · the document says
“should”
Addresses the chapter's subject of removing what it calls politicized considerations from energy policy, by a different route: this order works through revocations and methodology instructions rather than through the departmental programs the chapter named.
2025-01-20
Executive Order 14169 · 90 FR 8619
See: Memo of July 15, 2025
Section 3 imposes a 90-day pause on new obligations and disbursements of development assistance pending review for programmatic efficiency and consistency with foreign policy. Section 2 states that no further assistance shall be disbursed in a manner not fully aligned with the President's foreign policy.
In plain English
This order paused most foreign aid for 90 days. Each program was to be reviewed.
Recorded against
Partly matches
chapter 9, p. 254 · the document says
“should”
Addresses the chapter's subject of scaling the agency back, by a different route. The chapter asked for a return to at least the 2019 budget level and deep cuts to the international affairs account, which requires Congress; this order pauses and reviews existing assistance under executive authority.
Partly matches
chapter 9, p. 256 · the document says
“should”
The review standard is alignment with the President's foreign policy generally. The chapter's proposal was narrower and specific: ending funding to any partner engaging with Chinese entities.
2025-01-20
Executive Order 14168 · 90 FR 8615
Rescinds: EO 13988, January 20, 2021; EO 14004, January 25, 2021; EO 14021, March 8, 2021; EO 14075, June 15, 2022 See: EO 14183, January 27, 2025; EO 14185, January 27, 2025; EO 14201, February 5, 2025
Section 2 states the policy of recognizing two sexes, male and female, and that they are not changeable. Section 3(g) provides that federal funds shall not be used to promote what the order calls gender ideology and directs agencies to assess grant conditions accordingly. Section 4 addresses prisons and detention.
In plain English
This order says there are two sexes only. It says that cannot change. Federal money must not go to work on gender identity.
Recorded against
Closely matches
chapter 18, p. 585 · the document says
“should”
The chapter asked that agencies enforce sex discrimination law on the biological binary meaning of sex. This order establishes that policy across the federal government. The chapter's request was framed around enforcement of discrimination law specifically; this order is broader.
Partly matches
chapter 14, p. 456 · the document says
“should”
Addresses the chapter's subject. The chapter asked specifically that the Centers for Disease Control end its collection of gender identity data; this order sets a government-wide policy on recognizing two sexes and on federal funds rather than naming that data collection.
2025-01-20
Executive Order 14164 · 90 FR 8463
Section 1 states that capital punishment is an essential tool for deterring and punishing the most heinous crimes, and that officials who oppose it have sought to thwart the execution of lawfully imposed sentences.
In plain English
This order tells the government to use the death penalty more. It says past sentences should be carried out.
Recorded against
Closely matches
chapter 17, p. 554 · the document says
“should”
The chapter asked that the Administration do everything possible to obtain finality for those on federal death row and pursue capital punishment for applicable crimes. This order directs that approach.
2025-01-20
Executive Order 14153 · 90 FR 8347
Section 3 directs the Secretary of the Interior to evaluate changes to, including potential rescission of, Public Land Order 5150 of 1971, to place a temporary moratorium on activities under the June 2024 Ambler Road record of decision pending review, and to reinstate the July 2020 record of decision.
In plain English
Alaska has land the state was promised long ago. Old orders held it back. This order tells officials to look at lifting them. It also revisits a mining road.
Recorded against
Partly matches
chapter 16, p. 530 · the document says
“should”
The chapter named Public Land Order 5150 specifically, saying its revocation would give Alaska 1.3 million acres and should be a top priority. This order directs that changes to it, including potential rescission, be evaluated. Directing an evaluation is not the revocation the chapter asked for.
Partly matches
chapter 16, p. 530 · the document says
“must”
The chapter asked for immediate approval of the Ambler Road project. This order pauses activity under the 2024 record of decision pending review and reinstates the 2020 record of decision, which is a step toward that outcome by a different route than immediate approval.
Closely matches
chapter 16, p. 521 · the document says
“must”
Matches the chapter's request to roll back current orders and restore an energy development agenda on Alaskan lands.
What this tracker does not cover
Executive orders signed on or after 20 January 2025 that bear on a proposal indexed here. Every entry's date, Federal Register citation and URL come from the Federal Register API and are not typed by hand.
- Agency rulemaking. OPM and other agencies have issued rules in this area; none are indexed here yet, so the absence of a rule below is not evidence that none exists.
- Litigation. Challenges have been filed against several of these orders. No court docket is recorded here yet, and a match below says nothing about whether an action survived review.
- Appointments, budget actions, and agency guidance.
- Chapters other than 3. Only chapter 3 is indexed, so an action matching an unindexed chapter does not appear.